Advances in the Development of Auricular Cartilage Bioimplants.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Laura Mercedes Rendon-Romero, Augusto Rojas-Martinez
{"title":"Advances in the Development of Auricular Cartilage Bioimplants.","authors":"Laura Mercedes Rendon-Romero, Augusto Rojas-Martinez","doi":"10.1089/ten.teb.2024.0227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conditions such as congenital abnormalities, cancer, infections, and trauma can severely impact the integrity of the auricular cartilage, resulting in the need for a replacement structure. Current implants, carved from the patient's rib, involve multiple surgeries and carry risks of adverse events such as contamination, rejection, and reabsorption. Tissue engineering aims to develop lifelong auricular bioimplants using different methods, different cell types, growth factors and maintenance media formulations, and scaffolding materials compatible with the host. This review aims to examine the progress in auricular bioengineering, focusing on improvements derived from <i>in vivo</i> models and clinical trials, as well as the author's suggestions to enhance the methods. For this scope review, 30 articles were retrieved through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, plus 6 manually selected articles. The methods reported in the articles were categorized into four levels according to the development phases: source of cells, cell media supplementation, scaffold, or scaffold-free methods, and experimental <i>in vivo</i> or clinical approaches. Many methods have demonstrated potential for the development of bioimplants; four clinical trials reported a structure like the external ear that could be maintained after overcoming post-transplant inflammation. However, several challenges must be solved, such as obtaining a structure that accurately replicates the shape and size of the patient's healthy contralateral auricle and improvements to avoid immunological rejection and resorption of the bioimplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2024.0227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conditions such as congenital abnormalities, cancer, infections, and trauma can severely impact the integrity of the auricular cartilage, resulting in the need for a replacement structure. Current implants, carved from the patient's rib, involve multiple surgeries and carry risks of adverse events such as contamination, rejection, and reabsorption. Tissue engineering aims to develop lifelong auricular bioimplants using different methods, different cell types, growth factors and maintenance media formulations, and scaffolding materials compatible with the host. This review aims to examine the progress in auricular bioengineering, focusing on improvements derived from in vivo models and clinical trials, as well as the author's suggestions to enhance the methods. For this scope review, 30 articles were retrieved through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, plus 6 manually selected articles. The methods reported in the articles were categorized into four levels according to the development phases: source of cells, cell media supplementation, scaffold, or scaffold-free methods, and experimental in vivo or clinical approaches. Many methods have demonstrated potential for the development of bioimplants; four clinical trials reported a structure like the external ear that could be maintained after overcoming post-transplant inflammation. However, several challenges must be solved, such as obtaining a structure that accurately replicates the shape and size of the patient's healthy contralateral auricle and improvements to avoid immunological rejection and resorption of the bioimplant.

耳廓软骨生物植入物的研究进展。
先天性异常、癌症、感染和创伤等情况会严重影响耳软骨的完整性,导致需要更换结构。目前的植入物是从病人的肋骨上切割出来的,需要进行多次手术,并且存在污染、排斥和重吸收等不良事件的风险。组织工程旨在利用不同的方法、不同的细胞类型、生长因子和维持介质配方以及与宿主相适应的支架材料,开发终身耳廓生物植入物。本文综述了耳廓生物工程的研究进展,重点介绍了耳廓生物工程在体内模型和临床试验方面的改进,以及作者对耳廓生物工程方法的改进建议。在这个范围综述中,通过系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目检索了30篇文章,外加6篇手动选择的文章。文章中报道的方法根据发展阶段分为四个层次:细胞来源、细胞培养基补充、支架或无支架方法、体内或临床实验方法。许多方法已经证明了生物植入物的发展潜力;四项临床试验报告了一种类似外耳的结构,可以在克服移植后的炎症后维持。然而,必须解决几个挑战,例如获得准确复制患者健康对侧耳廓形状和大小的结构,以及改进以避免免疫排斥和生物植入物的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信