Mass drug administration coverage evaluation for lymphatic filariasis in selected endemic districts of Jharkhand, India.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bijit Biswas, Pratima Gupta, G Jahnavi, Nishit Ranjan, Satya Ranjan Patra, Saurabh Varshney
{"title":"Mass drug administration coverage evaluation for lymphatic filariasis in selected endemic districts of Jharkhand, India.","authors":"Bijit Biswas, Pratima Gupta, G Jahnavi, Nishit Ranjan, Satya Ranjan Patra, Saurabh Varshney","doi":"10.1093/trstmh/trae136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate mass drug administration (MDA) coverage for lymphatic filariasis (LF) in selected endemic districts of Jharkhand, India, and to identify household-level determinants of drug consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional coverage evaluation survey was conducted in the Deoghar, Giridih and Godda districts of Jharkhand in 2023 within 6 wk of the completion of the MDA campaign. The survey included 9039 individuals from 1680 households across 56 randomly selected clusters (three urban, eight tribal and 45 rural).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 78.5% of households reported that at least one member consumed MDA drugs, with 54.5% reaching 'complete epidemiological drug coverage'. Factors positively associated with achieving 'complete epidemiological drug coverage' included higher education levels (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.02), awareness of LF (AOR 2.32), prior communication about MDA (AOR 1.38) and previous MDA participation (AOR 4.42). By contrast, larger family sizes were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving complete coverage (AOR 0.78). Adverse events were experienced by 14.9% of participants, primarily when MDA drugs were consumed on an empty stomach. Key reasons for non-compliance included perceived absence of disease (25.5%), fear of side effects (22.4%) and absence during the campaign (20.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDA coverage was suboptimal, with only one-half of households achieving 'complete epidemiological drug coverage'. Enhancing MDA coverage and compliance requires intensified Information, Education, and Communication efforts, especially among marginalized communities, both during campaigns and all year round.</p>","PeriodicalId":23218,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trae136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate mass drug administration (MDA) coverage for lymphatic filariasis (LF) in selected endemic districts of Jharkhand, India, and to identify household-level determinants of drug consumption.

Methods: A cross-sectional coverage evaluation survey was conducted in the Deoghar, Giridih and Godda districts of Jharkhand in 2023 within 6 wk of the completion of the MDA campaign. The survey included 9039 individuals from 1680 households across 56 randomly selected clusters (three urban, eight tribal and 45 rural).

Results: Approximately 78.5% of households reported that at least one member consumed MDA drugs, with 54.5% reaching 'complete epidemiological drug coverage'. Factors positively associated with achieving 'complete epidemiological drug coverage' included higher education levels (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.02), awareness of LF (AOR 2.32), prior communication about MDA (AOR 1.38) and previous MDA participation (AOR 4.42). By contrast, larger family sizes were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving complete coverage (AOR 0.78). Adverse events were experienced by 14.9% of participants, primarily when MDA drugs were consumed on an empty stomach. Key reasons for non-compliance included perceived absence of disease (25.5%), fear of side effects (22.4%) and absence during the campaign (20.9%).

Conclusions: MDA coverage was suboptimal, with only one-half of households achieving 'complete epidemiological drug coverage'. Enhancing MDA coverage and compliance requires intensified Information, Education, and Communication efforts, especially among marginalized communities, both during campaigns and all year round.

印度贾坎德邦选定流行区淋巴丝虫病大规模药物给药覆盖率评价
背景:本研究旨在评估印度恰尔肯德邦部分流行地区淋巴丝虫病(LF)大规模药物治疗(MDA)的覆盖率,并确定家庭层面的药物消费决定因素:方法:2023 年,在 MDA 运动结束后 6 周内,在贾坎德邦的 Deoghar、Giridih 和 Godda 地区进行了一次横断面覆盖率评估调查。调查对象包括随机抽取的 56 个群组(3 个城市群组、8 个部落群组和 45 个农村群组)1680 个家庭中的 9039 人:约 78.5% 的家庭报告至少有一名成员服用了 MDA 药物,54.5% 的家庭达到了 "流行病学药物全覆盖"。与实现 "流行病学药物全覆盖 "呈正相关的因素包括:教育程度较高(调整后 OR [AOR]1.02)、对低氟血症的认识(AOR 2.32)、事先就 MDA 进行过沟通(AOR 1.38)以及以前参与过 MDA(AOR 4.42)。相比之下,家庭人口越多,实现完全覆盖的可能性越低(AOR 0.78)。14.9%的参与者出现过不良反应,主要是在空腹服用 MDA 药物时。不遵守规定的主要原因包括认为没有疾病(25.5%)、害怕副作用(22.4%)和活动期间缺席(20.9%):MDA 的覆盖率并不理想,只有二分之一的家庭实现了 "流行病学药物全覆盖"。要提高 MDA 的覆盖率和依从性,就必须加强信息、教育和宣传工作,尤其是在运动期间和全年在边缘化社区开展这些工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene publishes authoritative and impactful original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of tropical medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信