The Effectiveness and Safety of the Short-Course Therapy in Liver Transplant Recipients With Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Transplant Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1111/tid.14434
Toshiki Miwa, Koh Okamoto, Shotaro Ishikawa, Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Shinya Yamamoto, Mahoko Ikeda, Shu Okugawa, Akihiko Ichida, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Takeya Tsutsumi
{"title":"The Effectiveness and Safety of the Short-Course Therapy in Liver Transplant Recipients With Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Toshiki Miwa, Koh Okamoto, Shotaro Ishikawa, Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Shinya Yamamoto, Mahoko Ikeda, Shu Okugawa, Akihiko Ichida, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Takeya Tsutsumi","doi":"10.1111/tid.14434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The appropriate duration of therapy for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) in liver transplant (LTx) recipients remains unknown. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of a short-course antimicrobial therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was performed in a single LTx center in Japan. All LTx recipients with GN-BSI receiving 6-16 days of therapy with adequate source control between 2010 and 2022 were included. We collected data on demographics, underlying medical conditions, clinical manifestations, laboratory and microbiology data, ID consultation, oral switch therapy, and subsequent clinical course through chart review. We compared the 30-day composite outcome comprising mortality and recurrence of BSI or local infection between patients receiving a short-course (6-10 days) therapy and those receiving a long-course (11-16 days) therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 study participants, 27 (29.7%) and 64 (70.3%) received short-course and long-course antimicrobial therapy, respectively. Cholangitis was the most common source of BSI (57/91 [62.6%]). Overall, the primary composite outcome occurred in 18 patients (19.8%), most of which was the recurrence of local infection (n = 14). The primary composite outcome was numerically compatible between these groups (5/27 [18.5%] vs. 13/64 [20.3%]; p = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A short-course therapy may be an effective option in selected LTx recipients with uncomplicated GN-BSI. Whether a short-course oral switch therapy is a viable option or not warrants further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The appropriate duration of therapy for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) in liver transplant (LTx) recipients remains unknown. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of a short-course antimicrobial therapy.

Methods: This retrospective study was performed in a single LTx center in Japan. All LTx recipients with GN-BSI receiving 6-16 days of therapy with adequate source control between 2010 and 2022 were included. We collected data on demographics, underlying medical conditions, clinical manifestations, laboratory and microbiology data, ID consultation, oral switch therapy, and subsequent clinical course through chart review. We compared the 30-day composite outcome comprising mortality and recurrence of BSI or local infection between patients receiving a short-course (6-10 days) therapy and those receiving a long-course (11-16 days) therapy.

Results: Of 91 study participants, 27 (29.7%) and 64 (70.3%) received short-course and long-course antimicrobial therapy, respectively. Cholangitis was the most common source of BSI (57/91 [62.6%]). Overall, the primary composite outcome occurred in 18 patients (19.8%), most of which was the recurrence of local infection (n = 14). The primary composite outcome was numerically compatible between these groups (5/27 [18.5%] vs. 13/64 [20.3%]; p = 0.84).

Conclusions: A short-course therapy may be an effective option in selected LTx recipients with uncomplicated GN-BSI. Whether a short-course oral switch therapy is a viable option or not warrants further research.

短期治疗肝移植受者无并发症革兰氏阴性菌血症的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
导言:肝移植(LTx)受者中无并发症的革兰氏阴性血流感染(GN-BSI)的适当治疗时间仍然未知。本研究旨在探讨短程抗菌治疗的有效性:这项回顾性研究在日本一家肝移植中心进行。研究纳入了 2010 年至 2022 年间所有接受过 6-16 天治疗并充分控制病源的 GN-BSI LTx 患者。我们通过病历审查收集了有关人口统计学、基础医疗条件、临床表现、实验室和微生物学数据、ID 咨询、口服转换疗法以及后续临床过程的数据。我们比较了接受短疗程(6-10 天)治疗的患者与接受长疗程(11-16 天)治疗的患者的 30 天综合结果,包括死亡率和 BSI 或局部感染复发率:在91名研究参与者中,分别有27人(29.7%)和64人(70.3%)接受了短程和长程抗菌治疗。胆管炎是最常见的 BSI 来源(57/91 [62.6%])。总体而言,18 名患者(19.8%)出现了主要综合结果,其中大部分是局部感染复发(14 人)。这两组患者的主要综合结果在数量上相符(5/27 [18.5%] vs. 13/64 [20.3%];P = 0.84):结论:短程疗法可能是某些无并发症 GN-BSI LTx 受者的有效选择。短程口服转换疗法是否可行,还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信