Rationale and Logistics of Continuous Infusion Cephalosporin Antibiotics.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12060185
Abbie L Blunier, R Jake Crocker, Rachel Foster, Stephanie S May, Caroline E Powers, P Brandon Bookstaver
{"title":"Rationale and Logistics of Continuous Infusion Cephalosporin Antibiotics.","authors":"Abbie L Blunier, R Jake Crocker, Rachel Foster, Stephanie S May, Caroline E Powers, P Brandon Bookstaver","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12060185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cephalosporins have traditionally been administered as an intermittent infusion. With the knowledge that cephalosporins demonstrate a time-dependent pharmacodynamic profile, administration via continuous infusion may provide more effective antibiotic exposure for successful therapy. Proposed benefits of administration via continuous infusion include less IV manipulation, decreased potential for antibiotic resistance, and potential cost savings. The objective of this review was to provide a detailed assessment of available evidence for the use of continuous infusion cephalosporins and practical dosing and administration recommendations. Studies were gathered and assessed for inclusion via a literature search of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE using mesh terms [\"continuous infusion\" and \"cephalosporin\"], \"intermittent infusion\", [\"intermittent versus continuous\" and \"cephalosporin\"], \"continuous infusion cephalosporin\", as well as specific drug names. References from included studies were also evaluated for inclusion. Data which compared the two administration methods (continuous infusion vs. intermittent infusion) were evaluated. Thirty-five studies were analyzed among several cephalosporins with variable delivery. Dosing regimens utilized in the selected studies were assessed with known compatibility and stability data and further summarized.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12060185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cephalosporins have traditionally been administered as an intermittent infusion. With the knowledge that cephalosporins demonstrate a time-dependent pharmacodynamic profile, administration via continuous infusion may provide more effective antibiotic exposure for successful therapy. Proposed benefits of administration via continuous infusion include less IV manipulation, decreased potential for antibiotic resistance, and potential cost savings. The objective of this review was to provide a detailed assessment of available evidence for the use of continuous infusion cephalosporins and practical dosing and administration recommendations. Studies were gathered and assessed for inclusion via a literature search of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE using mesh terms ["continuous infusion" and "cephalosporin"], "intermittent infusion", ["intermittent versus continuous" and "cephalosporin"], "continuous infusion cephalosporin", as well as specific drug names. References from included studies were also evaluated for inclusion. Data which compared the two administration methods (continuous infusion vs. intermittent infusion) were evaluated. Thirty-five studies were analyzed among several cephalosporins with variable delivery. Dosing regimens utilized in the selected studies were assessed with known compatibility and stability data and further summarized.

头孢菌素类抗生素持续输注的理论基础和物流。
头孢菌素传统上是间歇性输注。由于了解到头孢菌素具有时间依赖性的药效学特征,通过持续输注给药可能为成功治疗提供更有效的抗生素暴露。建议通过持续输注给药的好处包括减少静脉操作,降低潜在的抗生素耐药性,以及潜在的成本节约。本综述的目的是对持续输注头孢菌素的使用以及实际剂量和给药建议的现有证据进行详细评估。通过PubMed和Ovid MEDLINE的文献检索,使用网格术语[“连续输注”和“头孢菌素”]、“间歇输注”、[间歇与连续输注]和“头孢菌素”]、“连续输注头孢菌素”以及特定药物名称,收集和评估研究。纳入研究的参考文献也被评估纳入。比较两种给药方法(连续输注与间歇输注)的数据进行了评估。35项研究分析了几种不同递送的头孢菌素。根据已知的相容性和稳定性数据对所选研究中使用的给药方案进行评估,并进一步总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信