Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jacie R McHaney, Kenneth E Hancock, Daniel B Polley, Aravindakshan Parthasarathy
{"title":"Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.","authors":"Jacie R McHaney, Kenneth E Hancock, Daniel B Polley, Aravindakshan Parthasarathy","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-81673-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multi-talker speech intelligibility requires successful separation of the target speech from background speech. Successful speech segregation relies on bottom-up neural coding fidelity of sensory information and top-down effortful listening. Here, we studied the interaction between temporal processing measured using Envelope Following Responses (EFRs) to amplitude modulated tones, and pupil-indexed listening effort, as it related to performance on the Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test in normal-hearing adults. Listening effort increased at the more difficult signal-to-noise ratios, but speech intelligibility only decreased at the hardest signal-to-noise ratio. Pupil-indexed listening effort and EFRs did not independently relate to QuickSIN performance. However, the combined effects of both EFRs and listening effort explained significant variance in QuickSIN performance. Our results suggest a synergistic interaction between sensory coding and listening effort as it relates to multi-talker speech intelligibility. These findings can inform the development of next-generation multi-dimensional approaches for testing speech intelligibility deficits in listeners with normal-hearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"30882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81673-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-talker speech intelligibility requires successful separation of the target speech from background speech. Successful speech segregation relies on bottom-up neural coding fidelity of sensory information and top-down effortful listening. Here, we studied the interaction between temporal processing measured using Envelope Following Responses (EFRs) to amplitude modulated tones, and pupil-indexed listening effort, as it related to performance on the Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test in normal-hearing adults. Listening effort increased at the more difficult signal-to-noise ratios, but speech intelligibility only decreased at the hardest signal-to-noise ratio. Pupil-indexed listening effort and EFRs did not independently relate to QuickSIN performance. However, the combined effects of both EFRs and listening effort explained significant variance in QuickSIN performance. Our results suggest a synergistic interaction between sensory coding and listening effort as it relates to multi-talker speech intelligibility. These findings can inform the development of next-generation multi-dimensional approaches for testing speech intelligibility deficits in listeners with normal-hearing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

感官表征和学生指数化的听力努力为多语者的语音清晰度提供了互补的贡献。
多说话者的语音清晰度要求目标语音与背景语音的成功分离。成功的语音分离依赖于自下而上的感觉信息的神经编码保真度和自上而下的努力倾听。在这里,我们研究了使用包络跟随反应(EFRs)测量振幅调制音调的时间处理与瞳孔索引听力努力之间的相互作用,因为它与正常听力成年人在快速噪音语音(QuickSIN)测试中的表现有关。在更困难的信噪比下,听力努力会增加,但在最困难的信噪比下,语音可理解性只会下降。学生索引听力努力和efr与QuickSIN成绩没有独立的关系。然而,efr和倾听努力的综合影响解释了QuickSIN表现的显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,感觉编码和听力努力之间存在协同作用,因为它与多说话者的语音可理解性有关。这些发现可以为下一代多维方法的发展提供信息,用于测试听力正常的听者的言语理解缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信