Analysis of risk factors for co-morbid anxiety and depression in pregnant women

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Wei Zhang , Ling Li , Xiabidan Tuxunjiang , Bahedana Sailike , Xiaoting Wang , Weicui Meng , Sufeila Shalayiding , Ting Jiang
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for co-morbid anxiety and depression in pregnant women","authors":"Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Ling Li ,&nbsp;Xiabidan Tuxunjiang ,&nbsp;Bahedana Sailike ,&nbsp;Xiaoting Wang ,&nbsp;Weicui Meng ,&nbsp;Sufeila Shalayiding ,&nbsp;Ting Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Co-morbid anxiety and depression (CAD) is defined as the co-existence of anxiety and depression. During pregnancy, women are more prone to negative emotions, such as anxiety and depression, than the general female population. The incidence of CAD during pregnancy is 1–26 %. The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence and influencing factors of CAD during pregnancy. The study cohort included 3053 pregnant women who underwent maternity check-ups at a tertiary hospital in China. Demographic characteristics, level of social support, and psychological characteristics were collected from participants via a self-reported questionnaire, which included the General Demographic Information Questionnaire, Pregnancy Stress Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Perceived Social Support Scale. A binary logistic regression model and a categorical decision tree based on the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector algorithm were used to identify factors influencing CAD during pregnancy, and the differences between the two models were analysed and compared. The results of the logistic regression and decision tree models identified pregnancy stress, social support, pregnancy knowledge, couple relationship satisfaction, advanced maternal age, and occupation as factors influencing CAD during pregnancy. Pregnancy stress was the most influential factor. The areas under the curve of the classification decision tree and logistic regression models were 0.801 (95 % CI: 0.778–0.823) and 0.827 (95 % CI: 0.807–0.847), respectively, with specificities of 63 and 77 %, and sensitivities of 83.9 and 76.3 %. Logistic regression excels when dealing with linear relationships, while decision trees are particularly useful when dealing with nonlinear relationships. Therefore, combining logistic regression and decision trees can achieve some degree of model diversity, thus improving predictive power and confidence in the results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 116323"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124006085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-morbid anxiety and depression (CAD) is defined as the co-existence of anxiety and depression. During pregnancy, women are more prone to negative emotions, such as anxiety and depression, than the general female population. The incidence of CAD during pregnancy is 1–26 %. The aims of this study were to investigate the incidence and influencing factors of CAD during pregnancy. The study cohort included 3053 pregnant women who underwent maternity check-ups at a tertiary hospital in China. Demographic characteristics, level of social support, and psychological characteristics were collected from participants via a self-reported questionnaire, which included the General Demographic Information Questionnaire, Pregnancy Stress Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Perceived Social Support Scale. A binary logistic regression model and a categorical decision tree based on the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector algorithm were used to identify factors influencing CAD during pregnancy, and the differences between the two models were analysed and compared. The results of the logistic regression and decision tree models identified pregnancy stress, social support, pregnancy knowledge, couple relationship satisfaction, advanced maternal age, and occupation as factors influencing CAD during pregnancy. Pregnancy stress was the most influential factor. The areas under the curve of the classification decision tree and logistic regression models were 0.801 (95 % CI: 0.778–0.823) and 0.827 (95 % CI: 0.807–0.847), respectively, with specificities of 63 and 77 %, and sensitivities of 83.9 and 76.3 %. Logistic regression excels when dealing with linear relationships, while decision trees are particularly useful when dealing with nonlinear relationships. Therefore, combining logistic regression and decision trees can achieve some degree of model diversity, thus improving predictive power and confidence in the results.
孕妇伴发焦虑和抑郁的危险因素分析。
共病焦虑抑郁(CAD)被定义为焦虑和抑郁的共存。在怀孕期间,女性比一般女性更容易产生焦虑和抑郁等负面情绪。妊娠期冠心病的发生率为1- 26%。本研究旨在探讨妊娠期冠心病的发生率及影响因素。该研究队列包括在中国一家三级医院接受产科检查的3053名孕妇。通过自述问卷(包括一般人口统计信息问卷、妊娠压力量表、广义焦虑量表、患者健康问卷-9和感知社会支持量表)收集参与者的人口统计学特征、社会支持水平和心理特征。采用二元logistic回归模型和基于卡方自动交互检测器算法的分类决策树识别妊娠期CAD的影响因素,并分析比较两种模型的差异。logistic回归和决策树模型的结果表明,妊娠压力、社会支持、妊娠知识、夫妻关系满意度、高龄产妇和职业是影响妊娠期CAD的因素。怀孕压力是影响最大的因素。分类决策树和logistic回归模型曲线下面积分别为0.801 (95% CI: 0.778 ~ 0.823)和0.827 (95% CI: 0.807 ~ 0.847),特异性分别为63%和77%,敏感性分别为83.9和76.3%。逻辑回归在处理线性关系时表现出色,而决策树在处理非线性关系时特别有用。因此,将逻辑回归与决策树相结合可以实现一定程度的模型多样性,从而提高预测能力和结果的置信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信