Endoscopic mucosal resection and open-lid submucosal biopsy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer: a retrospective observational study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yushi Kawakami, Satoki Shichijo, Noriya Uedo, James Weiquan Li, Renata Nobre, Yasuhiro Tani, Daiki Kitagawa, Takehiro Ninomiya, Tomoya Ueda, Yuya Asada, Yuki Okubo, Atsuko Kizawa, Shunsuke Yoshii, Takashi Kanesaka, Koji Higashino, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara, Naoki Shinno, Hisashi Hara, Takeshi Omori, Yasuhito Tanaka
{"title":"Endoscopic mucosal resection and open-lid submucosal biopsy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Yushi Kawakami, Satoki Shichijo, Noriya Uedo, James Weiquan Li, Renata Nobre, Yasuhiro Tani, Daiki Kitagawa, Takehiro Ninomiya, Tomoya Ueda, Yuya Asada, Yuki Okubo, Atsuko Kizawa, Shunsuke Yoshii, Takashi Kanesaka, Koji Higashino, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara, Naoki Shinno, Hisashi Hara, Takeshi Omori, Yasuhito Tanaka","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2447526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer can be difficult to diagnose owing to a lack of endoscopic features in the superficial mucosa. Moreover, a forceps biopsy may not reveal a pathological diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 'open-lid submucosal biopsy', a technique wherein EMR followed by biopsy of the ulcer floor is performed for a pathological diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study involved patients with suspected diffuse invasive gastric cancer on endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging in whom endoscopic forceps biopsy did not lead to a pathological diagnosis. Patients who underwent EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy were included. The primary outcome was the total diagnostic yield. The secondary outcomes were the diagnostic yields of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy and incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2011 and February 2022, EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy for diagnostic purposes were performed on seven patients without complications. EMR was diagnostic in four (57%) cases of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer. Open-lid submucosal biopsy was diagnostic in five (71%) cases. As the primary endpoint, the combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy led to a pathological diagnosis in six cases (86%). Secondary analysis revealed gastric adenocarcinoma in 9 of 22 (41%) EMR specimens, while open-lid submucosal biopsies were positive for adenocarcinoma in 14 of 60 specimens (23%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy was safe and showed good accuracy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2447526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer can be difficult to diagnose owing to a lack of endoscopic features in the superficial mucosa. Moreover, a forceps biopsy may not reveal a pathological diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 'open-lid submucosal biopsy', a technique wherein EMR followed by biopsy of the ulcer floor is performed for a pathological diagnosis.

Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study involved patients with suspected diffuse invasive gastric cancer on endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging in whom endoscopic forceps biopsy did not lead to a pathological diagnosis. Patients who underwent EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy were included. The primary outcome was the total diagnostic yield. The secondary outcomes were the diagnostic yields of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy and incidence of complications.

Results: Between June 2011 and February 2022, EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy for diagnostic purposes were performed on seven patients without complications. EMR was diagnostic in four (57%) cases of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer. Open-lid submucosal biopsy was diagnostic in five (71%) cases. As the primary endpoint, the combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy led to a pathological diagnosis in six cases (86%). Secondary analysis revealed gastric adenocarcinoma in 9 of 22 (41%) EMR specimens, while open-lid submucosal biopsies were positive for adenocarcinoma in 14 of 60 specimens (23%).

Conclusions: The combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy was safe and showed good accuracy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer.

内镜下粘膜切除术和开盖粘膜下活检诊断弥漫性浸润性胃癌的回顾性观察研究。
背景与研究目的:弥漫性浸润性胃癌由于其浅表粘膜缺乏内镜特征而难以诊断。此外,钳活检可能无法显示病理诊断。我们的目的是评估内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和“开盖粘膜下活检”的诊断率和安全性,这是一种通过EMR和溃疡底活检进行病理诊断的技术。患者和方法:本回顾性观察性研究纳入内镜和横断面成像疑似弥漫性浸润性胃癌的患者,内镜钳活检未导致病理诊断。包括接受EMR和开盖粘膜下活检的患者。主要结局是总诊断率。次要结果是EMR和开盖粘膜下活检的诊断率和并发症的发生率。结果:2011年6月至2022年2月期间,7例患者进行了EMR和开盖粘膜下活检诊断,无并发症。4例(57%)弥漫性浸润性胃癌通过EMR诊断。5例(71%)开盖粘膜下活检确诊。作为主要终点,EMR联合开盖粘膜下活检导致6例(86%)的病理诊断。二次分析显示22例EMR标本中有9例(41%)为胃腺癌,而60例标本中有14例(23%)为开盖粘膜下活检腺癌阳性。结论:EMR联合开盖粘膜下活检对弥漫性浸润性胃癌的诊断安全、准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信