Endoscopic mucosal resection and open-lid submucosal biopsy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer: a retrospective observational study.
{"title":"Endoscopic mucosal resection and open-lid submucosal biopsy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Yushi Kawakami, Satoki Shichijo, Noriya Uedo, James Weiquan Li, Renata Nobre, Yasuhiro Tani, Daiki Kitagawa, Takehiro Ninomiya, Tomoya Ueda, Yuya Asada, Yuki Okubo, Atsuko Kizawa, Shunsuke Yoshii, Takashi Kanesaka, Koji Higashino, Tomoki Michida, Ryu Ishihara, Naoki Shinno, Hisashi Hara, Takeshi Omori, Yasuhito Tanaka","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2447526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer can be difficult to diagnose owing to a lack of endoscopic features in the superficial mucosa. Moreover, a forceps biopsy may not reveal a pathological diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 'open-lid submucosal biopsy', a technique wherein EMR followed by biopsy of the ulcer floor is performed for a pathological diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study involved patients with suspected diffuse invasive gastric cancer on endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging in whom endoscopic forceps biopsy did not lead to a pathological diagnosis. Patients who underwent EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy were included. The primary outcome was the total diagnostic yield. The secondary outcomes were the diagnostic yields of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy and incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2011 and February 2022, EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy for diagnostic purposes were performed on seven patients without complications. EMR was diagnostic in four (57%) cases of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer. Open-lid submucosal biopsy was diagnostic in five (71%) cases. As the primary endpoint, the combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy led to a pathological diagnosis in six cases (86%). Secondary analysis revealed gastric adenocarcinoma in 9 of 22 (41%) EMR specimens, while open-lid submucosal biopsies were positive for adenocarcinoma in 14 of 60 specimens (23%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy was safe and showed good accuracy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2447526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and study aims: Diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer can be difficult to diagnose owing to a lack of endoscopic features in the superficial mucosa. Moreover, a forceps biopsy may not reveal a pathological diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 'open-lid submucosal biopsy', a technique wherein EMR followed by biopsy of the ulcer floor is performed for a pathological diagnosis.
Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study involved patients with suspected diffuse invasive gastric cancer on endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging in whom endoscopic forceps biopsy did not lead to a pathological diagnosis. Patients who underwent EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy were included. The primary outcome was the total diagnostic yield. The secondary outcomes were the diagnostic yields of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy and incidence of complications.
Results: Between June 2011 and February 2022, EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy for diagnostic purposes were performed on seven patients without complications. EMR was diagnostic in four (57%) cases of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer. Open-lid submucosal biopsy was diagnostic in five (71%) cases. As the primary endpoint, the combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy led to a pathological diagnosis in six cases (86%). Secondary analysis revealed gastric adenocarcinoma in 9 of 22 (41%) EMR specimens, while open-lid submucosal biopsies were positive for adenocarcinoma in 14 of 60 specimens (23%).
Conclusions: The combination of EMR and open-lid submucosal biopsy was safe and showed good accuracy for the diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative gastric cancer.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution