Evaluation of antibiotic purchase data for ceftiofur and enrofloxacin and minimum inhibitory concentrations among Escherichia coli isolates from swine farms in the Midwestern United States using multiple statistical models.
Karyn A Havas, Roy Edler, Laura Ruesch, Marlee Braun, Joel Nerem, Scott Dee, Taylor Spronk, Laura B Goodman, Noelle Noyes, H Morgan Scott
{"title":"Evaluation of antibiotic purchase data for ceftiofur and enrofloxacin and minimum inhibitory concentrations among Escherichia coli isolates from swine farms in the Midwestern United States using multiple statistical models.","authors":"Karyn A Havas, Roy Edler, Laura Ruesch, Marlee Braun, Joel Nerem, Scott Dee, Taylor Spronk, Laura B Goodman, Noelle Noyes, H Morgan Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is considered a global One Health threat. Controlling selection pressure by reducing antibiotic use in livestock is a significant component of the response to this threat. The science concerning use and resistance is complicated and affected by time from antibiotic exposure, changing bacterial fitness, and varies by drug and pathogen. From May 2020 through October 2023, we collected intestinal (substandard and sick pigs) and fecal swab (healthy pig) samples at breed-to-wean (BTW) and wean-to-market (WTM) swine production sites and isolated E. coli bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on these isolates to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for ceftiofur and enrofloxacin. Monthly antibiotic purchase data were used to calculate the active milligrams of drug purchased and these were divided by the kilograms of pigs produced from a farm site to provide a mass-adjusted proxy metric for farm-level antibiotic use. The relationship between use and MIC was then evaluated using a variety of multivariable statistical models. Across multiple modeling approaches, both farm type (i.e., BTW versus WTM) and farm-level antibiotic use maintained statistically significant relationships relative to E. coli MIC values for each respective drug. Use of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin can lead to increased MIC values among E. coli over time. The reasons for antibiotic purchases were not tracked as part of this project. Future work should evaluate the age of the individual pig and the time from last treatment when sampling these animals to separate out the group from individual-level effects of antibiotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"235 ","pages":"106411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is considered a global One Health threat. Controlling selection pressure by reducing antibiotic use in livestock is a significant component of the response to this threat. The science concerning use and resistance is complicated and affected by time from antibiotic exposure, changing bacterial fitness, and varies by drug and pathogen. From May 2020 through October 2023, we collected intestinal (substandard and sick pigs) and fecal swab (healthy pig) samples at breed-to-wean (BTW) and wean-to-market (WTM) swine production sites and isolated E. coli bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on these isolates to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for ceftiofur and enrofloxacin. Monthly antibiotic purchase data were used to calculate the active milligrams of drug purchased and these were divided by the kilograms of pigs produced from a farm site to provide a mass-adjusted proxy metric for farm-level antibiotic use. The relationship between use and MIC was then evaluated using a variety of multivariable statistical models. Across multiple modeling approaches, both farm type (i.e., BTW versus WTM) and farm-level antibiotic use maintained statistically significant relationships relative to E. coli MIC values for each respective drug. Use of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin can lead to increased MIC values among E. coli over time. The reasons for antibiotic purchases were not tracked as part of this project. Future work should evaluate the age of the individual pig and the time from last treatment when sampling these animals to separate out the group from individual-level effects of antibiotic use.
期刊介绍:
Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on:
Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals;
Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases;
Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology;
Disease and infection control or eradication measures;
The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment;
Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis;
Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.