Proof of Concept Study: Comparison of Semi-Automated RNA Isolation Methods from Archived Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues with Clinical Routine RNA Isolation Methods.

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Patrick Hannibal Dalsbo Petersen, Jaslin Pallikkunnath James, Lene Buhl Riis, Claus Kim Høgdall, Estrid Vilma Høgdall
{"title":"Proof of Concept Study: Comparison of Semi-Automated RNA Isolation Methods from Archived Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues with Clinical Routine RNA Isolation Methods.","authors":"Patrick Hannibal Dalsbo Petersen, Jaslin Pallikkunnath James, Lene Buhl Riis, Claus Kim Høgdall, Estrid Vilma Høgdall","doi":"10.3390/mps7060101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-quality RNA is crucial in clinical diagnostics and precision medicine. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues pose a challenge due to nucleic acid fragmentation and crosslinking. In this pilot study, various commercially available techniques for extracting RNA from small FFPE samples were compared. We evaluated the KingFisher Duo automated system or the manual MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit as an RNA extraction method combined with either a xylene, d-limonene, or AutoLys M tubes deparaffinization method. Additionally, the automated Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE kit and the High Pure FFPET RNA Isolation Kit were examined using FFPE samples from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, as well as samples from ovarian, kidney, and breast cancer and the skin. The KingFisher Duo system gave a higher yield and more consistent RNA quantities, especially from small volumes of IBD samples, compared to manual extraction. The deparaffinization method also impacted results, with AutoLys M tubes proving effective in combination with the KingFisher Duo system. Conversely, the High Pure kit exhibited higher yields for larger FFPE samples. While RNA integrity is a critical factor, particularly for messenger RNA (mRNA) expression studies, its role is less prominent in microRNA (miRNA) analyses. Recognizing this, our study focused on RNA yield and purity (A260/A230) to evaluate RNA extraction methods for various sample types. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate RNA extraction methods based on sample characteristics and research goals, highlighting the performance of automated methods and the impact of deparaffinization choices. The findings contribute to refining RNA extraction for molecular biology analyses, suggesting avenues for further exploration, including cost-effectiveness under specific experimental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7060101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality RNA is crucial in clinical diagnostics and precision medicine. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues pose a challenge due to nucleic acid fragmentation and crosslinking. In this pilot study, various commercially available techniques for extracting RNA from small FFPE samples were compared. We evaluated the KingFisher Duo automated system or the manual MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit as an RNA extraction method combined with either a xylene, d-limonene, or AutoLys M tubes deparaffinization method. Additionally, the automated Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE kit and the High Pure FFPET RNA Isolation Kit were examined using FFPE samples from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, as well as samples from ovarian, kidney, and breast cancer and the skin. The KingFisher Duo system gave a higher yield and more consistent RNA quantities, especially from small volumes of IBD samples, compared to manual extraction. The deparaffinization method also impacted results, with AutoLys M tubes proving effective in combination with the KingFisher Duo system. Conversely, the High Pure kit exhibited higher yields for larger FFPE samples. While RNA integrity is a critical factor, particularly for messenger RNA (mRNA) expression studies, its role is less prominent in microRNA (miRNA) analyses. Recognizing this, our study focused on RNA yield and purity (A260/A230) to evaluate RNA extraction methods for various sample types. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate RNA extraction methods based on sample characteristics and research goals, highlighting the performance of automated methods and the impact of deparaffinization choices. The findings contribute to refining RNA extraction for molecular biology analyses, suggesting avenues for further exploration, including cost-effectiveness under specific experimental conditions.

概念验证研究:从存档的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织中半自动RNA分离方法与临床常规RNA分离方法的比较。
高质量RNA对临床诊断和精准医疗至关重要。由于核酸断裂和交联,福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织构成了挑战。在这项初步研究中,比较了从小型FFPE样品中提取RNA的各种商业上可用的技术。我们评估了KingFisher Duo自动化系统或手动MagMAX FFPE DNA/RNA Ultra Kit作为RNA提取方法与二甲苯,d-limonene或AutoLys M管脱胶方法的组合。此外,自动Maxwell RSC RNA FFPE试剂盒和高纯FFPET RNA分离试剂盒使用炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的FFPE样本,以及卵巢癌、肾癌、乳腺癌和皮肤样本进行检测。与人工提取相比,KingFisher Duo系统的产量更高,RNA数量更一致,特别是从小体积的IBD样品中。脱胶方法也影响了结果,AutoLys M管与KingFisher Duo系统的结合被证明是有效的。相反,对于较大的FFPE样品,高纯试剂盒显示出更高的收率。虽然RNA完整性是一个关键因素,特别是在信使RNA (mRNA)表达研究中,但它在microRNA (miRNA)分析中的作用不太突出。认识到这一点,我们的研究重点是RNA产量和纯度(A260/A230),以评估各种样品类型的RNA提取方法。这些发现强调了根据样品特征和研究目标选择合适的RNA提取方法的重要性,突出了自动化方法的性能和分离选择的影响。这些发现有助于改进分子生物学分析的RNA提取,为进一步探索提供了途径,包括在特定实验条件下的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信