Study on Efficient Operating Conditions for Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis Using Different Ion Species and Anion-Exchange Membranes.

IF 3.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Sadato Kikuchi, Souichiro Hirao, Shunya Kayakiri, Yuriko Kakihana, Mitsuru Higa
{"title":"Study on Efficient Operating Conditions for Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis Using Different Ion Species and Anion-Exchange Membranes.","authors":"Sadato Kikuchi, Souichiro Hirao, Shunya Kayakiri, Yuriko Kakihana, Mitsuru Higa","doi":"10.3390/membranes14120262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate efficient operating conditions for bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED), a comparison of current efficiency (<i>CE</i>) and power intensity (<i>PI</i>) was conducted using different anion-exchange membranes (AEMs) and salt solutions (NaCl and Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) as feed solutions in BMED. The results indicated that <i>CE</i> was higher and <i>PI</i> was lower for a commercial proton-blocking AEM (ACM) than for a standard AEM (ASE) when NaCl was used. This is because ASE has a higher water content than ACM, leading to greater H<sup>+</sup> permeability, which reduces <i>CE</i>. Conversely, when Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was used, ASE exhibited higher <i>CE</i> and lower cell voltage (<i>CV</i>) than ACM, resulting in lower <i>PI</i> for ASE. This is attributable to the fact that, with Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, the effect of <i>CV</i> was more significant than H<sup>+</sup> permeability. These findings suggest that efficient operation can be achieved by selecting the appropriate combination of AEMs and salt solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18410,"journal":{"name":"Membranes","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Membranes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14120262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate efficient operating conditions for bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED), a comparison of current efficiency (CE) and power intensity (PI) was conducted using different anion-exchange membranes (AEMs) and salt solutions (NaCl and Na2SO4) as feed solutions in BMED. The results indicated that CE was higher and PI was lower for a commercial proton-blocking AEM (ACM) than for a standard AEM (ASE) when NaCl was used. This is because ASE has a higher water content than ACM, leading to greater H+ permeability, which reduces CE. Conversely, when Na2SO4 was used, ASE exhibited higher CE and lower cell voltage (CV) than ACM, resulting in lower PI for ASE. This is attributable to the fact that, with Na2SO4, the effect of CV was more significant than H+ permeability. These findings suggest that efficient operation can be achieved by selecting the appropriate combination of AEMs and salt solutions.

不同离子种类及阴离子交换膜双极膜电渗析高效操作条件的研究。
为了研究双极膜电渗析(BMED)的高效操作条件,比较了不同阴离子交换膜(AEMs)和盐溶液(NaCl和Na2SO4)作为进料溶液在双极膜电渗析(BMED)中的电流效率(CE)和功率强度(PI)。结果表明,在NaCl的作用下,商业质子阻断AEM (ACM)的CE比标准AEM (ASE)的CE高,PI低。这是因为ASE比ACM含水量更高,导致H+渗透率更高,从而降低了CE。相反,当使用Na2SO4时,ASE表现出比ACM更高的CE和更低的电池电压(CV),导致ASE的PI更低。这是由于在Na2SO4中,CV的影响比H+渗透率的影响更显著。这些结果表明,通过选择合适的AEMs和盐溶液组合,可以实现高效的操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Membranes
Membranes Chemical Engineering-Filtration and Separation
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1071
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of separation science and technology. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信