Fouling and Chemical Cleaning Strategies for Submerged Ultrafiltration Membrane: Synchronized Bench-Scale, Full-Scale, and Engineering Tests.

IF 3.3 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Xiwang Zhu, Chengyue Fan, Yichen Fang, Wenqing Yu, Yawei Xie, Hongyuan Liu
{"title":"Fouling and Chemical Cleaning Strategies for Submerged Ultrafiltration Membrane: Synchronized Bench-Scale, Full-Scale, and Engineering Tests.","authors":"Xiwang Zhu, Chengyue Fan, Yichen Fang, Wenqing Yu, Yawei Xie, Hongyuan Liu","doi":"10.3390/membranes14120251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated membrane fouling issues associated with the operation of a submerged ultrafiltration membrane in a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) and optimized the associated chemical cleaning strategies. By analyzing the surface components of the membrane foulant and the compositions of the membrane cleaning solution, the primary causes of membrane fouling were identified. Membrane fouling control strategies suitable for the DWTP were evaluated through chemical cleaning tests conducted for bench-scale, full-scale, and engineering cases. The results show that the membrane foulants were primarily composed of a mixture of inorganics and organics; the inorganics were mainly composed of Al and Si, while the organics were primarily humic acid (HA). Sodium citrate proved to be the most effective cleaning agent for inorganic fouling, which was mainly composed of Al, whereas sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) combined with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) showed the best removal efficiency for organic fouling, which predominantly consisted of HA and Si. However, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) combined with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) showed the best removal efficiency for organic fouling and Si; organic fouling predominantly consisted of HA. Based on the bench-scale test results, flux recovery was verified in the full-scale system. Under a constant pressure of 30 kPa, the combined acid-alkali cleaning achieved the best flux recovery, restoring the flux from 22.8 L/(m<sup>2</sup>·h) to 66.75 L/(m<sup>2</sup>·h). In the engineering tests, combined acid-alkali cleaning yielded results consistent with those of the full-scale tests. In the practical engineering cleaning process, adopting a cleaning strategy of alkaline (NaClO + NaOH) cleaning followed by acidic (sodium citrate) cleaning can effectively solve the membrane fouling problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":18410,"journal":{"name":"Membranes","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Membranes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14120251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated membrane fouling issues associated with the operation of a submerged ultrafiltration membrane in a drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) and optimized the associated chemical cleaning strategies. By analyzing the surface components of the membrane foulant and the compositions of the membrane cleaning solution, the primary causes of membrane fouling were identified. Membrane fouling control strategies suitable for the DWTP were evaluated through chemical cleaning tests conducted for bench-scale, full-scale, and engineering cases. The results show that the membrane foulants were primarily composed of a mixture of inorganics and organics; the inorganics were mainly composed of Al and Si, while the organics were primarily humic acid (HA). Sodium citrate proved to be the most effective cleaning agent for inorganic fouling, which was mainly composed of Al, whereas sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) combined with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) showed the best removal efficiency for organic fouling, which predominantly consisted of HA and Si. However, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) combined with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) showed the best removal efficiency for organic fouling and Si; organic fouling predominantly consisted of HA. Based on the bench-scale test results, flux recovery was verified in the full-scale system. Under a constant pressure of 30 kPa, the combined acid-alkali cleaning achieved the best flux recovery, restoring the flux from 22.8 L/(m2·h) to 66.75 L/(m2·h). In the engineering tests, combined acid-alkali cleaning yielded results consistent with those of the full-scale tests. In the practical engineering cleaning process, adopting a cleaning strategy of alkaline (NaClO + NaOH) cleaning followed by acidic (sodium citrate) cleaning can effectively solve the membrane fouling problem.

浸没式超滤膜的污染和化学清洗策略:同步的实验规模、全尺寸和工程测试。
研究了某饮用水处理厂(DWTP)超滤膜运行过程中的膜污染问题,并优化了相关的化学清洗策略。通过分析膜污染物的表面成分和膜清洗液的组成,确定了膜污染的主要原因。通过对实验规模、全尺寸和工程实例进行化学清洗试验,评估了适用于DWTP的膜污染控制策略。结果表明:膜污染物主要由无机物和有机物混合组成;无机物以Al和Si为主,有机物以腐植酸(HA)为主。柠檬酸钠对以Al为主的无机污垢去除效果最好,次氯酸钠(NaClO)和氢氧化钠(NaOH)对以HA和Si为主的有机污垢去除效果最好。次氯酸钠(NaClO)与氢氧化钠(NaOH)复合对有机污垢和硅的去除效果最好;有机污染主要由HA组成。在台架试验结果的基础上,对通量回收进行了实物验证。在恒压30 kPa条件下,酸碱联合清洗的通量回收率最佳,从22.8 L/(m2·h)恢复到66.75 L/(m2·h)。在工程试验中,酸碱联合清洗的结果与全尺寸试验结果一致。在实际工程清洗过程中,采用碱性(NaClO + NaOH)清洗后酸性(柠檬酸钠)清洗的清洗策略,可有效解决膜污染问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Membranes
Membranes Chemical Engineering-Filtration and Separation
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1071
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Membranes (ISSN 2077-0375) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of separation science and technology. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信