Two-stage surgery with oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior fixation in degenerative scoliosis with lumbosacral curve-driven degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a feasible option to prevent postoperative coronal decompensation.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Zuoran Fan, Qingyang Huang, Weiguo Zhu, Wei Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yu Wang, Dongfan Wang, Tao Hu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
{"title":"Two-stage surgery with oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior fixation in degenerative scoliosis with lumbosacral curve-driven degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a feasible option to prevent postoperative coronal decompensation.","authors":"Zuoran Fan, Qingyang Huang, Weiguo Zhu, Wei Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yu Wang, Dongfan Wang, Tao Hu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05368-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to introduce a two-stage surgical procedure, namely oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), for spinal disorders treatment. Furthermore, clinical outcomes and imaging results are analyzed between OLIF with posterior fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with fixation for lumbosacral curve-driven degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>146 patients with type 2 DLS who underwent OLIF or PLIF between January 2019 and November 2023 were included. Spinal and pelvic parameters were measured using X-ray imaging before and after surgery. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical fixation segments, drainage tube indwelling time, and drainage volume were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70 patients underwent OLIF and 76 underwent PLIF. Preoperative and postoperative clinical symptoms remain the same (p > 0.05). OLIF group exhibited significantly less intraoperative blood loss, fewer fixation segments, shorter drainage tube retention time, and reduced drainage volume (p < 0.01). Additionally, improvements in coronal parameters, including coronal balance distance, were more pronounced in OLIF group with less potential postoperative coronal imbalance (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For type 2 DLS, two-stage surgery of OLIF with posterior fixation represents a more efficient surgical approach, reducing surgical fusion segments, causing less trauma and bleeding, and effectively avoiding postoperative coronal plane decompensation than traditional posterior surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05368-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to introduce a two-stage surgical procedure, namely oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), for spinal disorders treatment. Furthermore, clinical outcomes and imaging results are analyzed between OLIF with posterior fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with fixation for lumbosacral curve-driven degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).

Methods: 146 patients with type 2 DLS who underwent OLIF or PLIF between January 2019 and November 2023 were included. Spinal and pelvic parameters were measured using X-ray imaging before and after surgery. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical fixation segments, drainage tube indwelling time, and drainage volume were recorded.

Results: 70 patients underwent OLIF and 76 underwent PLIF. Preoperative and postoperative clinical symptoms remain the same (p > 0.05). OLIF group exhibited significantly less intraoperative blood loss, fewer fixation segments, shorter drainage tube retention time, and reduced drainage volume (p < 0.01). Additionally, improvements in coronal parameters, including coronal balance distance, were more pronounced in OLIF group with less potential postoperative coronal imbalance (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: For type 2 DLS, two-stage surgery of OLIF with posterior fixation represents a more efficient surgical approach, reducing surgical fusion segments, causing less trauma and bleeding, and effectively avoiding postoperative coronal plane decompensation than traditional posterior surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信