The Perception of Unilateral Recessions in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Survey Among Dentists and Non-Professionals.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nikolaus Fürhauser, Rebecca Rosen, Lukas Fürhauser, Rudolf Fürhauser
{"title":"The Perception of Unilateral Recessions in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Survey Among Dentists and Non-Professionals.","authors":"Nikolaus Fürhauser, Rebecca Rosen, Lukas Fürhauser, Rudolf Fürhauser","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Esthetic dental features, especially the maxillary anterior teeth, significantly influence perceived attractiveness. Gingival recessions can negatively affect smile esthetics, particularly when asymmetrical.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the perception of dentists and non-professionals regarding subtle variations in the apically displaced soft tissue surrounding a lateral or central incisor.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on an ideal image of the esthetic zone, asymmetrical modifications of either a central or lateral incisor in the maxillary anterior were created and used in a digital survey asking participants to assess the overall appearance of the smile, using a visual analog scale (VAS). The dental expertise, age, and gender of the participants were recorded. For each image, the question was posed to identify if any of the teeth caused a visible irritation. The mean results of each tooth alteration and the correlation between dental expertise were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 participants were polled. There was a significant difference in the esthetic perception between the central and lateral incisors (p < 0.001). The perception threshold for a noticeable asymmetrical recession was 1.2 mm for the central and 2.0 mm for the lateral incisor. Gender and age showed no significant difference in the esthetic evaluation, and dental expertise was only significantly different for larger recessions (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The asymmetric changes were more noticeable for the central incisor than the lateral incisor. A unilateral recession change of 0.8 mm did not appear to influence the assessment of the overall smile. The dental expertise, age, or gender of the participants did not significantly correlate with a stricter esthetic perception.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The present study highlights that the perception of unilateral recession changes in the anterior maxilla varies between central and lateral incisors, with lateral incisor recessions being less impactful on the overall appearance of the smile. These findings suggest that small gingival changes can be acceptable for the overall esthetic outcome, underscoring the importance of discussing patient expectations and treatment options before restoration or orthodontic treatment and prioritizing the gingival margin of the central incisor which appeared more noticeable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Esthetic dental features, especially the maxillary anterior teeth, significantly influence perceived attractiveness. Gingival recessions can negatively affect smile esthetics, particularly when asymmetrical.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the perception of dentists and non-professionals regarding subtle variations in the apically displaced soft tissue surrounding a lateral or central incisor.

Materials and methods: Based on an ideal image of the esthetic zone, asymmetrical modifications of either a central or lateral incisor in the maxillary anterior were created and used in a digital survey asking participants to assess the overall appearance of the smile, using a visual analog scale (VAS). The dental expertise, age, and gender of the participants were recorded. For each image, the question was posed to identify if any of the teeth caused a visible irritation. The mean results of each tooth alteration and the correlation between dental expertise were statistically analyzed.

Results: A total of 114 participants were polled. There was a significant difference in the esthetic perception between the central and lateral incisors (p < 0.001). The perception threshold for a noticeable asymmetrical recession was 1.2 mm for the central and 2.0 mm for the lateral incisor. Gender and age showed no significant difference in the esthetic evaluation, and dental expertise was only significantly different for larger recessions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The asymmetric changes were more noticeable for the central incisor than the lateral incisor. A unilateral recession change of 0.8 mm did not appear to influence the assessment of the overall smile. The dental expertise, age, or gender of the participants did not significantly correlate with a stricter esthetic perception.

Clinical implications: The present study highlights that the perception of unilateral recession changes in the anterior maxilla varies between central and lateral incisors, with lateral incisor recessions being less impactful on the overall appearance of the smile. These findings suggest that small gingival changes can be acceptable for the overall esthetic outcome, underscoring the importance of discussing patient expectations and treatment options before restoration or orthodontic treatment and prioritizing the gingival margin of the central incisor which appeared more noticeable.

上颌审美区单侧衰退知觉:一项牙医和非专业人员的调查。
问题陈述:美观的牙齿特征,特别是上颌前牙,显著影响感知吸引力。牙龈萎缩会对微笑的美感产生负面影响,尤其是在不对称的情况下。目的:本研究旨在调查牙医和非专业人士的看法,关于微妙变化的顶端移位软组织周围的侧切牙或中切牙。材料和方法:根据理想的审美区图像,在上颌前门牙的中门牙或侧门牙的不对称修改被创建并用于数字调查,要求参与者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估微笑的整体外观。记录了参与者的牙科专业知识、年龄和性别。对于每张照片,问题都是为了确定是否有任何牙齿引起了可见的刺激。统计分析各牙变的平均结果及各牙专业知识的相关性。结果:共调查了114名参与者。结论:中切牙的不对称变化比侧切牙更明显。单方面的0.8毫米的衰退变化似乎不会影响对整体微笑的评估。参与者的牙科专业知识、年龄或性别与更严格的审美感知没有显著相关性。临床意义:本研究强调了上颌前牙在中门牙和侧门牙之间对单侧衰退变化的感知不同,侧门牙衰退对微笑整体外观的影响较小。这些发现表明,小的牙龈变化可以接受整体审美结果,强调在修复或正畸治疗前讨论患者期望和治疗方案的重要性,并优先考虑中切牙牙龈边缘,因为它看起来更明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信