Nikolaus Fürhauser, Rebecca Rosen, Lukas Fürhauser, Rudolf Fürhauser
{"title":"The Perception of Unilateral Recessions in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Survey Among Dentists and Non-Professionals.","authors":"Nikolaus Fürhauser, Rebecca Rosen, Lukas Fürhauser, Rudolf Fürhauser","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Esthetic dental features, especially the maxillary anterior teeth, significantly influence perceived attractiveness. Gingival recessions can negatively affect smile esthetics, particularly when asymmetrical.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the perception of dentists and non-professionals regarding subtle variations in the apically displaced soft tissue surrounding a lateral or central incisor.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on an ideal image of the esthetic zone, asymmetrical modifications of either a central or lateral incisor in the maxillary anterior were created and used in a digital survey asking participants to assess the overall appearance of the smile, using a visual analog scale (VAS). The dental expertise, age, and gender of the participants were recorded. For each image, the question was posed to identify if any of the teeth caused a visible irritation. The mean results of each tooth alteration and the correlation between dental expertise were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 participants were polled. There was a significant difference in the esthetic perception between the central and lateral incisors (p < 0.001). The perception threshold for a noticeable asymmetrical recession was 1.2 mm for the central and 2.0 mm for the lateral incisor. Gender and age showed no significant difference in the esthetic evaluation, and dental expertise was only significantly different for larger recessions (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The asymmetric changes were more noticeable for the central incisor than the lateral incisor. A unilateral recession change of 0.8 mm did not appear to influence the assessment of the overall smile. The dental expertise, age, or gender of the participants did not significantly correlate with a stricter esthetic perception.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The present study highlights that the perception of unilateral recession changes in the anterior maxilla varies between central and lateral incisors, with lateral incisor recessions being less impactful on the overall appearance of the smile. These findings suggest that small gingival changes can be acceptable for the overall esthetic outcome, underscoring the importance of discussing patient expectations and treatment options before restoration or orthodontic treatment and prioritizing the gingival margin of the central incisor which appeared more noticeable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem: Esthetic dental features, especially the maxillary anterior teeth, significantly influence perceived attractiveness. Gingival recessions can negatively affect smile esthetics, particularly when asymmetrical.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the perception of dentists and non-professionals regarding subtle variations in the apically displaced soft tissue surrounding a lateral or central incisor.
Materials and methods: Based on an ideal image of the esthetic zone, asymmetrical modifications of either a central or lateral incisor in the maxillary anterior were created and used in a digital survey asking participants to assess the overall appearance of the smile, using a visual analog scale (VAS). The dental expertise, age, and gender of the participants were recorded. For each image, the question was posed to identify if any of the teeth caused a visible irritation. The mean results of each tooth alteration and the correlation between dental expertise were statistically analyzed.
Results: A total of 114 participants were polled. There was a significant difference in the esthetic perception between the central and lateral incisors (p < 0.001). The perception threshold for a noticeable asymmetrical recession was 1.2 mm for the central and 2.0 mm for the lateral incisor. Gender and age showed no significant difference in the esthetic evaluation, and dental expertise was only significantly different for larger recessions (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The asymmetric changes were more noticeable for the central incisor than the lateral incisor. A unilateral recession change of 0.8 mm did not appear to influence the assessment of the overall smile. The dental expertise, age, or gender of the participants did not significantly correlate with a stricter esthetic perception.
Clinical implications: The present study highlights that the perception of unilateral recession changes in the anterior maxilla varies between central and lateral incisors, with lateral incisor recessions being less impactful on the overall appearance of the smile. These findings suggest that small gingival changes can be acceptable for the overall esthetic outcome, underscoring the importance of discussing patient expectations and treatment options before restoration or orthodontic treatment and prioritizing the gingival margin of the central incisor which appeared more noticeable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics