Assessment of appropriate utilization of out-of-office diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of hypertension.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Hussam Jnaid, Mohammed Aldosari, Mohammad Waqar Ahmad, Yaser Alendijani, Amira BaGubair, Dalal Alhaffar, Zainab Albasheer, Mansour Alrasheed
{"title":"Assessment of appropriate utilization of out-of-office diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of hypertension.","authors":"Hussam Jnaid, Mohammed Aldosari, Mohammad Waqar Ahmad, Yaser Alendijani, Amira BaGubair, Dalal Alhaffar, Zainab Albasheer, Mansour Alrasheed","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_757_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement devices, such as ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM), enhance the accuracy and reliability of BP readings, detecting white-coat and masked hypertension. The American Heart Association (AHA) advises confirming hypertension diagnoses with ABPM to prevent overdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of precise out-of-office diagnostic tools. This study aimed to 1) explore the prevalence of ABPM and HBPM use prior to hypertension diagnosis; 2) assess the adherence to AHA recommendations regarding ABPM utilization; and 3) investigate the association between patient characteristics and out-of-office BP monitoring practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a random sample of adult patients newly diagnosed with essential hypertension at a tertiary hospital primary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated the use of ABPM and HBPM in a sample of 268 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, with a mean age of 49.17 ± 12.69 years. Although ABPM orders were placed for 57.8% of patients, only 48.5% completed the procedure. Notably, 42.2% of hypertension diagnoses were solely based on ABPM, while 7.1% and 1.1% utilized HBPM alone or in combination with ABPM, respectively. This analysis revealed a lower utilization of ABPM among older adults, individuals with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and married patients (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, this association with marital status, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease was no longer statistically significant in a fully adjusted model (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Out-of-office BP monitoring, particularly ABPM, was underutilized in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially in older age groups and patients with specific comorbidities, who may benefit the most from this method. These results underscore the need for increasing physician knowledge and compliance with the existing guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"13 11","pages":"5083-5089"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_757_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement devices, such as ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM), enhance the accuracy and reliability of BP readings, detecting white-coat and masked hypertension. The American Heart Association (AHA) advises confirming hypertension diagnoses with ABPM to prevent overdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of precise out-of-office diagnostic tools. This study aimed to 1) explore the prevalence of ABPM and HBPM use prior to hypertension diagnosis; 2) assess the adherence to AHA recommendations regarding ABPM utilization; and 3) investigate the association between patient characteristics and out-of-office BP monitoring practices.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a random sample of adult patients newly diagnosed with essential hypertension at a tertiary hospital primary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2022.

Results: This study evaluated the use of ABPM and HBPM in a sample of 268 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, with a mean age of 49.17 ± 12.69 years. Although ABPM orders were placed for 57.8% of patients, only 48.5% completed the procedure. Notably, 42.2% of hypertension diagnoses were solely based on ABPM, while 7.1% and 1.1% utilized HBPM alone or in combination with ABPM, respectively. This analysis revealed a lower utilization of ABPM among older adults, individuals with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and married patients (P < 0.05). However, this association with marital status, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease was no longer statistically significant in a fully adjusted model (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Out-of-office BP monitoring, particularly ABPM, was underutilized in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, especially in older age groups and patients with specific comorbidities, who may benefit the most from this method. These results underscore the need for increasing physician knowledge and compliance with the existing guidelines.

评估办公室外诊断工具对高血压诊断的适当利用。
背景:室外血压测量设备,如动态血压监测(ABPM)和家庭血压监测(HBPM),提高血压读数的准确性和可靠性,检测白大褂和蒙面高血压。美国心脏协会(AHA)建议用ABPM确认高血压诊断,以防止过度诊断,强调精确的室外诊断工具的重要性。本研究旨在1)探讨高血压诊断前ABPM和HBPM的使用情况;2)评估对AHA关于ABPM使用建议的遵守情况;3)调查患者特征与门诊血压监测之间的关系。方法:回顾性横断面研究分析2016年至2022年沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医院初级保健中心新诊断为原发性高血压的成年患者的随机样本。结果:本研究评估了268例新诊断的高血压患者ABPM和HBPM的使用情况,平均年龄为49.17±12.69岁。尽管57.8%的患者都下了ABPM单,但只有48.5%的患者完成了手术。值得注意的是,42.2%的高血压诊断仅基于ABPM,而单独使用HBPM或联合ABPM分别为7.1%和1.1%。该分析显示,老年人、糖尿病或慢性肾脏疾病患者和已婚患者的ABPM利用率较低(P < 0.05)。然而,在完全调整的模型中,这种与婚姻状况、糖尿病和慢性肾脏疾病的关联不再具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:办公室外血压监测,特别是ABPM,在新诊断的高血压患者中未得到充分利用,特别是在年龄较大的人群和有特定合并症的患者中,他们可能从这种方法中获益最多。这些结果强调了增加医生知识和遵守现有指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信