Analyzing Competitive Demands in Mountain Running Races: A Running Power-Based Approach.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Juan Rodríguez-Medina, Belén Carballo-Leyenda, Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo, Fabio García-Heras, Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo
{"title":"Analyzing Competitive Demands in Mountain Running Races: A Running Power-Based Approach.","authors":"Juan Rodríguez-Medina, Belén Carballo-Leyenda, Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo, Fabio García-Heras, Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the competitive demands of mountain running races of varying lengths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six male athletes competed in Vertical race (∼3 km and ∼1000 m of total elevation change), Sky race (∼25 km and ∼3000 m of total elevation change), and SkyUltra race (∼80 km and ∼9000 m of total elevation change). Exercise intensity and competition load (TL) were assessed using running power, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest exercise intensity was observed in Vertical race (3.9 [0.4] W·kg-1, 93.6% [2.8%] HRmax, and 9.5 [0.7] RPE) compared to Sky race (3.5 [0.5] W·kg-1, 89.9% [2.4%] HRmax, and 8.5 [1.2] RPE), and SkyUltra (2.7 [0.6] W·kg-1, 73.4% [1.1%] HRmax, and 8.2 [1.1] RPE). Vertical races had the highest mean maximal power outputs for periods <10 minutes. They also had the highest proportion of time spent >5 W·kg-1 and the most time spent above the respiratory compensation threshold. The majority of time in SkyUltra was spent at low intensity. The highest TLs were observed in these races (6200.5 [708.0] kJ, 842.0 [35.7] AU for TLHR, and 4897.3 [940.7] AU for TLRPE). However, when normalized to competition time, the SkyUltra event showed the lowest values compared with the Vertical and Sky races (∼11 vs ∼14.5 kJ·min-1, ∼1.5 vs ∼2.5 AU·m-1 for TLHR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study expand knowledge about the effort demands of mountain races and demonstrate how these demands are affected by race duration. Additionally, the study highlights the potential use of running power for quantifying exercise in this sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"275-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the competitive demands of mountain running races of varying lengths.

Methods: Sixty-six male athletes competed in Vertical race (∼3 km and ∼1000 m of total elevation change), Sky race (∼25 km and ∼3000 m of total elevation change), and SkyUltra race (∼80 km and ∼9000 m of total elevation change). Exercise intensity and competition load (TL) were assessed using running power, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE).

Results: The highest exercise intensity was observed in Vertical race (3.9 [0.4] W·kg-1, 93.6% [2.8%] HRmax, and 9.5 [0.7] RPE) compared to Sky race (3.5 [0.5] W·kg-1, 89.9% [2.4%] HRmax, and 8.5 [1.2] RPE), and SkyUltra (2.7 [0.6] W·kg-1, 73.4% [1.1%] HRmax, and 8.2 [1.1] RPE). Vertical races had the highest mean maximal power outputs for periods <10 minutes. They also had the highest proportion of time spent >5 W·kg-1 and the most time spent above the respiratory compensation threshold. The majority of time in SkyUltra was spent at low intensity. The highest TLs were observed in these races (6200.5 [708.0] kJ, 842.0 [35.7] AU for TLHR, and 4897.3 [940.7] AU for TLRPE). However, when normalized to competition time, the SkyUltra event showed the lowest values compared with the Vertical and Sky races (∼11 vs ∼14.5 kJ·min-1, ∼1.5 vs ∼2.5 AU·m-1 for TLHR).

Conclusion: The results of this study expand knowledge about the effort demands of mountain races and demonstrate how these demands are affected by race duration. Additionally, the study highlights the potential use of running power for quantifying exercise in this sport.

分析山地跑步比赛的竞争需求:基于跑步力量的方法。
目的:本研究旨在分析不同长度的山地跑步比赛的竞争需求。方法:66名男性运动员参加了垂直赛(~ 3公里,总海拔变化~ 1000米)、天空赛(~ 25公里,总海拔变化~ 3000米)和SkyUltra赛(~ 80公里,总海拔变化~ 9000米)。运动强度和竞争负荷(TL)采用跑步功率、心率和感知运动强度评分(RPE)进行评估。结果:垂直赛(3.9 [0.4]W·kg-1, 93.6% [2.8%] HRmax, 9.5 [0.7] RPE)的运动强度高于天空赛(3.5 [0.5]W·kg-1, 89.9% [2.4%] HRmax, 8.5 [1.2] RPE)和天空超(2.7 [0.6]W·kg-1, 73.4% [1.1%] HRmax, 8.2 [1.1] RPE)。垂直赛跑在5 W·kg-1阶段的平均最大输出功率最高,并且在呼吸补偿阈值以上停留的时间最长。在SkyUltra的大部分时间都是低强度的。TLHR和TLRPE的最高TLs分别为6200.5 [708.0]kJ、842.0 [35.7]AU和4897.3 [940.7]AU。然而,当标准化到比赛时间时,与垂直和天空比赛相比,SkyUltra赛事显示出最低的值(TLHR为~ 11 vs ~ 14.5 kJ·min-1, ~ 1.5 vs ~ 2.5 AU·m-1)。结论:本研究的结果拓展了人们对山地比赛的努力需求的认识,并证明了这些需求是如何受到比赛时间的影响的。此外,该研究强调了跑步力量在这项运动中量化锻炼的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信