Development and validation of a predictive model for overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-esophagectomy: the role of lymph node metastatic stations.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Kexun Li, Simiao Lu, Kunyi Du, Chenghao Wang, Wenwu He, Qifeng Wang, Yongtao Han, Xuefeng Leng, Lin Peng
{"title":"Development and validation of a predictive model for overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-esophagectomy: the role of lymph node metastatic stations.","authors":"Kexun Li, Simiao Lu, Kunyi Du, Chenghao Wang, Wenwu He, Qifeng Wang, Yongtao Han, Xuefeng Leng, Lin Peng","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) poses a substantial healthcare challenge, particularly in areas such as East Asia. The pathologic nodal (pN) stage of ESCC remains a controversial factor. Accurately predicting overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy is crucial for treatment planning and improving treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An analysis was conducted using data from Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database of Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, spanning from January 2010 to December 2017. Our study aimed to examine the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node resection at individual stations, and treatment details of patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy. In addition, a novel nodal stage (N stage) was based on the number of lymph node metastasis (LNM) stations, and a prediction model for OS was devised using the pN stage and the newly proposed N stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After analyzing 49 indicators through univariate and multifactorial analyses, 25 of the most significant factors affecting OS after esophagectomy were identified. Further analysis using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression revealed six key factors. Models were developed based on the pN stage and the newly introduced N stage. Evaluation of the area under the curve indicated that Model 2 exhibited slightly superior clinical utility compared to Model 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that the newly introduced N stage, based on the number of LNM stations, exhibits comparable performance to the current American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control pN system, with a slight advantageous edge.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1735-1748"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) poses a substantial healthcare challenge, particularly in areas such as East Asia. The pathologic nodal (pN) stage of ESCC remains a controversial factor. Accurately predicting overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy is crucial for treatment planning and improving treatment outcomes.

Method: An analysis was conducted using data from Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database of Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, spanning from January 2010 to December 2017. Our study aimed to examine the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node resection at individual stations, and treatment details of patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy. In addition, a novel nodal stage (N stage) was based on the number of lymph node metastasis (LNM) stations, and a prediction model for OS was devised using the pN stage and the newly proposed N stage.

Results: After analyzing 49 indicators through univariate and multifactorial analyses, 25 of the most significant factors affecting OS after esophagectomy were identified. Further analysis using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression revealed six key factors. Models were developed based on the pN stage and the newly introduced N stage. Evaluation of the area under the curve indicated that Model 2 exhibited slightly superior clinical utility compared to Model 1.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the newly introduced N stage, based on the number of LNM stations, exhibits comparable performance to the current American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control pN system, with a slight advantageous edge.

食管切除术后食管鳞状细胞癌总生存率预测模型的建立和验证:淋巴结转移站的作用。
背景:食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)带来了巨大的医疗挑战,特别是在东亚等地区。ESCC的病理淋巴结分期仍然是一个有争议的因素。准确预测食管切除术后的总生存期(OS)对治疗计划和改善治疗结果至关重要。方法:利用我院2010年1月至2017年12月的数据进行分析[详情为同行评议盲法]。本研究旨在探讨食管切除术后ESCC患者的临床病理特征、淋巴结切除情况和治疗细节。此外,基于淋巴结转移(LNM)站数提出了新的淋巴结分期(N期),并利用pN分期和新提出的N分期设计了OS的预测模型。结果:通过单因素和多因素分析,对49项指标进行分析,确定了25项影响食管切除术后OS的最显著因素。进一步分析使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归揭示了六个关键因素。在pN阶段和新引入的N阶段的基础上建立了模型。对曲线下面积的评估表明,模型2的临床效用略优于模型1。结论:我们的研究表明,基于LNM站点数量的新引入的N阶段与目前美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联盟的pN系统表现相当,并具有轻微的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信