Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
David Hennes, Victoria Buckley, Anna Rosamilia
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.","authors":"David Hennes, Victoria Buckley, Anna Rosamilia","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-06010-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery. She presented with cervical-dominant prolapse (6 cm beyond the hymen) and a widened genital hiatus. She was initially managed with a Gellhorn pessary for 7 months, which was removed before surgery. Preoperative findings included prolapse of the cervix, anterior, and posterior vaginal walls (+ 1 cm distal to the hymen). A robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 120-min procedure, conducted by a certified urogynaecologist, began with harvesting a 12 × 4 cm autologous fascia lata graft from the left thigh. The graft site was closed with 2-0 absorbable sutures and supported with a compression bandage for 4 weeks. The graft was secured to the cervix and anterior longitudinal ligament through laparoscopic dissection and robot-assisted suturing. No perioperative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. At 1-year follow-up, there was no recurrence of prolapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacrohysteropexy using autologous fascia lata is a feasible and effective alternative to synthetic mesh, providing an additional surgical treatment option for women in settings where synthetic polypropylene meshes are not approved, contraindicated, or an unacceptable option.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-06010-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.

Methods: We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery. She presented with cervical-dominant prolapse (6 cm beyond the hymen) and a widened genital hiatus. She was initially managed with a Gellhorn pessary for 7 months, which was removed before surgery. Preoperative findings included prolapse of the cervix, anterior, and posterior vaginal walls (+ 1 cm distal to the hymen). A robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata was performed.

Results: The 120-min procedure, conducted by a certified urogynaecologist, began with harvesting a 12 × 4 cm autologous fascia lata graft from the left thigh. The graft site was closed with 2-0 absorbable sutures and supported with a compression bandage for 4 weeks. The graft was secured to the cervix and anterior longitudinal ligament through laparoscopic dissection and robot-assisted suturing. No perioperative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. At 1-year follow-up, there was no recurrence of prolapse.

Conclusions: Sacrohysteropexy using autologous fascia lata is a feasible and effective alternative to synthetic mesh, providing an additional surgical treatment option for women in settings where synthetic polypropylene meshes are not approved, contraindicated, or an unacceptable option.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信