The Effectiveness of Topical Treatment for Plantar Warts: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ana Mª Rayo Pérez, José María Juárez Jiménez, Rafael Rayo Rosado, Raquel García de la Peña
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Topical Treatment for Plantar Warts: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ana Mª Rayo Pérez, José María Juárez Jiménez, Rafael Rayo Rosado, Raquel García de la Peña","doi":"10.3390/idr16060090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Plantar warts, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), are a common condition that can be painful and resistant to treatment. There are various therapeutic options for managing them, but it is not always clear which are the most effective and tolerated by patients. Among the most commonly used treatments are a zinc and nitric complex (nitrizinc complex), cantharidin, and bleomycin, each with different mechanisms of action and profiles in terms of pain and patient satisfaction. <b>Objectives</b>: We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy, post-treatment pain, and patient satisfaction among three common treatments (zinc and nitric complex, cantharidin, and bleomycin) in subjects with plantar warts, as well as identify the most effective and best-tolerated treatment. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: This is a retrospective case series study analyzing 60 records of subjects aged 18 to 40 years diagnosed with plantar warts without systemic diseases or allergies and without any prior treatment. Complete records from 2020 to 2023 were selected. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the treatment received (zinc and nitric complex, cantharidin, bleomycin), and demographic variables, post-treatment pain (measured using the visual analog scale), the number of sessions required, and satisfaction after discharge (evaluated with the Likert scale) were analyzed. <b>Results</b>: Of the 60 subjects included, the group treated with bleomycin experienced higher levels of pain after the first session (mean of 7.1 points on the VAS) compared to the cantharidin group (2.7 points) and the zinc and nitric complex group (1.1 points). However, the bleomycin group required fewer sessions for complete healing (an average of 1.8 sessions), while the nitric acid group needed more (3.4 sessions), with cantharidin falling in between (2.5 sessions). Regarding post-discharge satisfaction, all groups showed comparable scores (between 7.9 and 8.5 points), although cantharidin demonstrated slightly higher satisfaction. A statistical analysis showed significant differences in the number of sessions and post-treatment pain between treatments (<i>p</i> < 0.05) but not in final satisfaction. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although bleomycin treatment is more painful, it is the most effective in terms of reducing the number of sessions required for complete healing. Cantharidin offers a good balance between efficacy and patient satisfaction, while a zinc and nitric complex, although less painful, requires more sessions for complete treatment. Each treatment has specific advantages, suggesting that therapeutic choices should be personalized according to the patient's needs and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"16 6","pages":"1108-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11675367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16060090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Plantar warts, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), are a common condition that can be painful and resistant to treatment. There are various therapeutic options for managing them, but it is not always clear which are the most effective and tolerated by patients. Among the most commonly used treatments are a zinc and nitric complex (nitrizinc complex), cantharidin, and bleomycin, each with different mechanisms of action and profiles in terms of pain and patient satisfaction. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy, post-treatment pain, and patient satisfaction among three common treatments (zinc and nitric complex, cantharidin, and bleomycin) in subjects with plantar warts, as well as identify the most effective and best-tolerated treatment. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case series study analyzing 60 records of subjects aged 18 to 40 years diagnosed with plantar warts without systemic diseases or allergies and without any prior treatment. Complete records from 2020 to 2023 were selected. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the treatment received (zinc and nitric complex, cantharidin, bleomycin), and demographic variables, post-treatment pain (measured using the visual analog scale), the number of sessions required, and satisfaction after discharge (evaluated with the Likert scale) were analyzed. Results: Of the 60 subjects included, the group treated with bleomycin experienced higher levels of pain after the first session (mean of 7.1 points on the VAS) compared to the cantharidin group (2.7 points) and the zinc and nitric complex group (1.1 points). However, the bleomycin group required fewer sessions for complete healing (an average of 1.8 sessions), while the nitric acid group needed more (3.4 sessions), with cantharidin falling in between (2.5 sessions). Regarding post-discharge satisfaction, all groups showed comparable scores (between 7.9 and 8.5 points), although cantharidin demonstrated slightly higher satisfaction. A statistical analysis showed significant differences in the number of sessions and post-treatment pain between treatments (p < 0.05) but not in final satisfaction. Conclusions: Although bleomycin treatment is more painful, it is the most effective in terms of reducing the number of sessions required for complete healing. Cantharidin offers a good balance between efficacy and patient satisfaction, while a zinc and nitric complex, although less painful, requires more sessions for complete treatment. Each treatment has specific advantages, suggesting that therapeutic choices should be personalized according to the patient's needs and preferences.

局部治疗足底疣的有效性:回顾性队列研究。
背景:由人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)引起的足底疣是一种常见的疾病,可能会引起疼痛并对治疗产生抗药性。有多种治疗方法来控制它们,但并不总是清楚哪一种是最有效和最能被患者耐受的。最常用的治疗方法是锌和硝酸复合物(氮锌复合物),斑蝥素和博来霉素,每一种都有不同的作用机制和在疼痛和患者满意度方面的特点。目的:我们旨在评估和比较三种常见治疗方法(锌和硝酸复合物、斑蝥素和博来霉素)对足底疣患者的临床疗效、治疗后疼痛和患者满意度,并确定最有效和最耐受的治疗方法。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,分析了60例年龄在18至40岁之间诊断为足底疣,无全身性疾病或过敏且未接受任何治疗的受试者。选取2020 - 2023年的完整记录。根据所接受的治疗(锌和一氧化氮复合物、cantharidin、博来霉素)和人口学变量将受试者分为三组,分析治疗后疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表测量)、所需疗程数和出院后满意度(使用Likert量表评估)。结果:在纳入的60名受试者中,与斑蝥素组(2.7分)和锌和硝酸复合物组(1.1分)相比,博来霉素组在第一次治疗后经历了更高水平的疼痛(VAS平均7.1分)。然而,博莱霉素组需要更少的疗程才能完全愈合(平均1.8次),而硝酸组需要更多(3.4次),斑蝥素介于两者之间(2.5次)。关于出院后满意度,虽然斑蝥素表现出稍高的满意度,但所有组的得分相当(在7.9到8.5分之间)。经统计学分析,两组患者治疗次数和治疗后疼痛差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),但最终满意度差异无统计学意义。结论:虽然博来霉素治疗更痛苦,但在减少完全愈合所需的疗程数量方面,它是最有效的。斑蝥素在疗效和患者满意度之间提供了很好的平衡,而锌和一氧化氮复合物虽然疼痛较少,但需要更多的疗程才能完成治疗。每一种治疗方法都有其独特的优势,这表明治疗选择应根据患者的需要和偏好进行个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信