Predicting macular hole surgery outcomes: Integrating preoperative OCT features with supervised machine learning statistical models.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_1895_24
Ramesh Venkatesh, Priyanka Gandhi, Ayushi Choudhary, Gaurang Sehgal, Kanika Godani, Shubham Darade, Rupal Kathare, Prathiba Hande, Vishma Prabhu, Jay Chhablani
{"title":"Predicting macular hole surgery outcomes: Integrating preoperative OCT features with supervised machine learning statistical models.","authors":"Ramesh Venkatesh, Priyanka Gandhi, Ayushi Choudhary, Gaurang Sehgal, Kanika Godani, Shubham Darade, Rupal Kathare, Prathiba Hande, Vishma Prabhu, Jay Chhablani","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1895_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate various supervised machine learning (ML) statistical models to predict anatomical outcomes after macular hole (MH) surgery using preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed OCT data from idiopathic MH eyes at baseline and at 1-month post-surgery. The dataset was split 80:20 between training and testing. XLSTAT® statistical software (Lumivero, USA) was used to train different ML models on 10°CT parameters: prefoveal posterior cortical vitreous status, epiretinal membrane, intraretinal cysts, foveal retinal pigment epithelium hyperreflectivity, MH basal diameter, MH area (MHA), hole-forming factor, MH index, tractional hole index, and diameter hole index. The most effective statistical model was identified and was further assessed for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on a separate testing dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six ML statistical models were trained on 33,260°CT data points from 3326°CT images of 308 operated MH (300 patients) eyes. Following training and internal validation, the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest accuracy (0.92), precision (0.94), recall (0.97), and F-score (0.96), and lowest misclassification rate. RF model identified the MHA index as the best predictor of post-surgical anatomical success. Following external testing, the RF model confirmed the highest accuracy and lowest misclassification rate (8.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML-based statistical models can be used to predict MH status after surgery. The RF model was the most accurate ML model, and the MHA index was the best predictor of postoperative hole closure after surgery based on preoperative OCT parameters. These predictions may help with future surgical planning for MH patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 Suppl 1","pages":"S66-S71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1895_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate various supervised machine learning (ML) statistical models to predict anatomical outcomes after macular hole (MH) surgery using preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) features.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed OCT data from idiopathic MH eyes at baseline and at 1-month post-surgery. The dataset was split 80:20 between training and testing. XLSTAT® statistical software (Lumivero, USA) was used to train different ML models on 10°CT parameters: prefoveal posterior cortical vitreous status, epiretinal membrane, intraretinal cysts, foveal retinal pigment epithelium hyperreflectivity, MH basal diameter, MH area (MHA), hole-forming factor, MH index, tractional hole index, and diameter hole index. The most effective statistical model was identified and was further assessed for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on a separate testing dataset.

Results: Six ML statistical models were trained on 33,260°CT data points from 3326°CT images of 308 operated MH (300 patients) eyes. Following training and internal validation, the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest accuracy (0.92), precision (0.94), recall (0.97), and F-score (0.96), and lowest misclassification rate. RF model identified the MHA index as the best predictor of post-surgical anatomical success. Following external testing, the RF model confirmed the highest accuracy and lowest misclassification rate (8.8%).

Conclusion: ML-based statistical models can be used to predict MH status after surgery. The RF model was the most accurate ML model, and the MHA index was the best predictor of postoperative hole closure after surgery based on preoperative OCT parameters. These predictions may help with future surgical planning for MH patients.

预测黄斑孔手术结果:将术前OCT特征与监督机器学习统计模型相结合。
目的:评估各种监督机器学习(ML)统计模型,利用术前光学相干断层扫描(OCT)特征预测黄斑孔(MH)手术后的解剖结果。方法:本回顾性研究分析了特发性MH眼在基线和术后1个月的OCT数据。数据集在训练和测试之间的比例为80:20。采用XLSTAT®统计软件(Lumivero, USA)对不同ML模型进行10°CT参数训练:中央凹前后皮质玻璃体状态、视网膜前膜、视网膜内囊肿、中央凹视网膜色素上皮高反射率、MH基底直径、MH面积(MHA)、孔形成因子、MH指数、诱导孔指数、直径孔指数。确定了最有效的统计模型,并在单独的测试数据集上进一步评估其准确性、敏感性和特异性。结果:308例(300例)MH手术眼3326°CT图像的33260°CT数据点上训练了6个ML统计模型。经过训练和内部验证,随机森林(RF)模型达到了最高的正确率(0.92)、精密度(0.94)、召回率(0.97)和f分数(0.96),以及最低的误分类率。RF模型确定MHA指数是术后解剖成功的最佳预测指标。经过外部测试,RF模型的准确率最高,误分类率最低(8.8%)。结论:基于ml的统计模型可用于预测术后MH状态。RF模型是最准确的ML模型,MHA指数是基于术前OCT参数的术后孔闭合的最佳预测指标。这些预测可能有助于MH患者未来的手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信