Supporting Nursing Staff During Crises: Impact of Organisational Support Measures and Resources in Job Satisfaction in German Nursing Homes.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elisabeth Diehl, Anna Hirschmüller, Aline Wege, Albert Nienhaus, Pavel Dietz
{"title":"Supporting Nursing Staff During Crises: Impact of Organisational Support Measures and Resources in Job Satisfaction in German Nursing Homes.","authors":"Elisabeth Diehl, Anna Hirschmüller, Aline Wege, Albert Nienhaus, Pavel Dietz","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9060159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic placed an immense burden on nursing home staff, significantly increasing their workload. How the impact of these challenges on job satisfaction is mitigated by personal and social resources, along with organisational support measures initiated by nursing homes, is investigated in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2021, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among nursing home staff in Rhineland-Palatinate (n = 373). The questionnaire contained parts of standardised instruments (parts of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), Brief Resilience Scale) and self-developed questions related to support measures such as training, psychological support and work organisation changes. The association of these support measures, as well as personal and social resources (e.g., resilience, social support, sense of community), with job satisfaction was explored. Descriptive, bivariate and regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While various support measures were offered to the nursing home staff, significant gaps remained. Training on hygiene and COVID-19 care was beneficial but not universally available. Similarly, psychological, pastoral and palliative support was lacking for a large portion of nursing home staff. Surprisingly, in the regression analysis, frequent information updates from supervisors were found to be negatively correlated with job satisfaction (<i>p</i> = 0.002). However, some personal and social resources (resilience (<i>p</i> = 0.002), social support (<i>p</i> = 0.001), sense of community at work (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), commitment to the workplace (<i>p</i> = 0.019), recognition by management (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001)), and various support measures (training programmes (<i>p</i> = 0.005), changes in work organisation (<i>p</i> = 0.008), technical measures (<i>p</i> = 0.025)) were positively correlated with job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that despite the implementation of various support measures for nursing home staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, significant gaps remained. Notably, a substantial portion of staff members lacked access to crucial support services such as psychological, pastoral and palliative care. Furthermore, healthcare facility managers should prioritise the following support measures, especially during crises: comprehensive training, including resilience training; flexible working arrangements; and recognition for nursing staff. Ultimately, healthcare organisations should aim to create a supportive work environment that fosters a sense of community and belonging among their nursing workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9060159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic placed an immense burden on nursing home staff, significantly increasing their workload. How the impact of these challenges on job satisfaction is mitigated by personal and social resources, along with organisational support measures initiated by nursing homes, is investigated in this study.

Methods: In 2021, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among nursing home staff in Rhineland-Palatinate (n = 373). The questionnaire contained parts of standardised instruments (parts of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), Brief Resilience Scale) and self-developed questions related to support measures such as training, psychological support and work organisation changes. The association of these support measures, as well as personal and social resources (e.g., resilience, social support, sense of community), with job satisfaction was explored. Descriptive, bivariate and regression analyses were conducted.

Results: While various support measures were offered to the nursing home staff, significant gaps remained. Training on hygiene and COVID-19 care was beneficial but not universally available. Similarly, psychological, pastoral and palliative support was lacking for a large portion of nursing home staff. Surprisingly, in the regression analysis, frequent information updates from supervisors were found to be negatively correlated with job satisfaction (p = 0.002). However, some personal and social resources (resilience (p = 0.002), social support (p = 0.001), sense of community at work (p ≤ 0.001), commitment to the workplace (p = 0.019), recognition by management (p ≤ 0.001)), and various support measures (training programmes (p = 0.005), changes in work organisation (p = 0.008), technical measures (p = 0.025)) were positively correlated with job satisfaction.

Conclusions: This study highlights that despite the implementation of various support measures for nursing home staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, significant gaps remained. Notably, a substantial portion of staff members lacked access to crucial support services such as psychological, pastoral and palliative care. Furthermore, healthcare facility managers should prioritise the following support measures, especially during crises: comprehensive training, including resilience training; flexible working arrangements; and recognition for nursing staff. Ultimately, healthcare organisations should aim to create a supportive work environment that fosters a sense of community and belonging among their nursing workforce.

危机期间支持护理人员:组织支持措施和资源对德国养老院工作满意度的影响。
背景/目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行给养老院工作人员带来了巨大的负担,大大增加了他们的工作量。本研究调查了个人和社会资源以及养老院发起的组织支持措施如何减轻这些挑战对工作满意度的影响。方法:于2021年对莱茵兰-普法尔茨州养老院工作人员进行横断面调查(n = 373)。问卷包含标准化工具的部分(哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)的部分,简要弹性量表)和与支持措施相关的自主开发的问题,如培训,心理支持和工作组织变化。这些支持措施,以及个人和社会资源(如弹性、社会支持、社区意识)与工作满意度的关系进行了探讨。进行了描述性、双变量和回归分析。结果:虽然为养老院工作人员提供了各种支持措施,但仍存在显着差距。有关卫生和COVID-19护理的培训是有益的,但并非人人都能获得。同样,很大一部分养老院工作人员缺乏心理、精神和缓和支助。令人惊讶的是,在回归分析中,发现主管频繁更新信息与工作满意度呈负相关(p = 0.002)。然而,一些个人和社会资源(弹性(p = 0.002)、社会支持(p = 0.001)、工作中的社区意识(p≤0.001)、对工作场所的承诺(p = 0.019)、管理层的认可(p≤0.001))和各种支持措施(培训计划(p = 0.005)、工作组织的变化(p = 0.008)、技术措施(p = 0.025))与工作满意度呈正相关。结论:本研究强调,尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间对养老院工作人员实施了各种支持措施,但仍存在重大差距。值得注意的是,相当一部分工作人员无法获得关键的支助服务,如心理、牧师和缓和治疗。此外,保健设施管理人员应优先考虑以下支助措施,特别是在危机期间:全面培训,包括复原力培训;灵活的工作安排;以及对护理人员的认可。最终,医疗机构应该致力于创造一个支持性的工作环境,在护理人员中培养社区意识和归属感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信