Leber congenital amaurosis: A clinical and genetic study from a tertiary eye care center.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Abhishek Upadhyaya, Srikanta Kr Padhy, Nithin Teja, Goura Chattannavar, Shreya Dutta, Venkatesh Pochaboina, Jeyapoorani Balasubramanian, Chitra Kannabiran, Brijesh Takkar, Manjushree Bhate, Subhadra Jalali, Deepika C Parameswarappa
{"title":"Leber congenital amaurosis: A clinical and genetic study from a tertiary eye care center.","authors":"Abhishek Upadhyaya, Srikanta Kr Padhy, Nithin Teja, Goura Chattannavar, Shreya Dutta, Venkatesh Pochaboina, Jeyapoorani Balasubramanian, Chitra Kannabiran, Brijesh Takkar, Manjushree Bhate, Subhadra Jalali, Deepika C Parameswarappa","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_545_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the clinical phenotypes and genetic mutations in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) from a tertiary eye care center in India.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study includes patients with a clinical diagnosis of LCA who underwent genetic testing from January 2016 to December 2021. The clinical exome of the patients was analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing. The genetic variants found were classified as per standard American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria and ClinVar database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 35 patients (19 females, 16 males) of LCA. Family history was positive in 29% (10/35) and a history of consanguinity was noted in 54% (19/35) of the patients. The mean presenting best-corrected visual acuity was 2.48 ± 0.59 logMAR. Retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities and macular involvement were seen in 83% (58/70) and 23% (16/70) of the eyes, respectively, at presentation. The most common causative genes for LCA in our cohort were: GUCY2D (20%, 7/35), CRB1 (14%, 5/35), RPE65 (11%, 4/35), RPGRIP1 (11%, 4/35), and LCA5 (9%, 3/35). Autosomal recessive inheritance was seen in 94% (33/35). Macular involvement at presentation was seen in CRB1 (3/5), NMNAT1 (2/2), and one each of RPE65, LCA5, and RDH12 patients. The genetic testing cost was reduced from 23,800 INR to 15,000 INR per test in the study duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic screening of LCA cases identified various genotypes, with GUCY2D being the most common. Increased awareness and reduced costs of genetic testing would benefit both patients and caregivers. With promising clinical trial outcomes, genotyping is crucial for better patient selection and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_545_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the clinical phenotypes and genetic mutations in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) from a tertiary eye care center in India.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: The study includes patients with a clinical diagnosis of LCA who underwent genetic testing from January 2016 to December 2021. The clinical exome of the patients was analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing. The genetic variants found were classified as per standard American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria and ClinVar database.

Results: There were 35 patients (19 females, 16 males) of LCA. Family history was positive in 29% (10/35) and a history of consanguinity was noted in 54% (19/35) of the patients. The mean presenting best-corrected visual acuity was 2.48 ± 0.59 logMAR. Retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities and macular involvement were seen in 83% (58/70) and 23% (16/70) of the eyes, respectively, at presentation. The most common causative genes for LCA in our cohort were: GUCY2D (20%, 7/35), CRB1 (14%, 5/35), RPE65 (11%, 4/35), RPGRIP1 (11%, 4/35), and LCA5 (9%, 3/35). Autosomal recessive inheritance was seen in 94% (33/35). Macular involvement at presentation was seen in CRB1 (3/5), NMNAT1 (2/2), and one each of RPE65, LCA5, and RDH12 patients. The genetic testing cost was reduced from 23,800 INR to 15,000 INR per test in the study duration.

Conclusions: Genetic screening of LCA cases identified various genotypes, with GUCY2D being the most common. Increased awareness and reduced costs of genetic testing would benefit both patients and caregivers. With promising clinical trial outcomes, genotyping is crucial for better patient selection and treatment.

莱伯先天性黑朦:来自三级眼科护理中心的临床和遗传研究。
目的:评估来自印度三级眼科保健中心的Leber先天性黑朦(LCA)患者的临床表型和基因突变。设计:回顾性观察性研究。方法:研究纳入了2016年1月至2021年12月进行基因检测的临床诊断为LCA的患者。通过靶向下一代测序分析患者的临床外显子组。发现的遗传变异按照美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院(ACMG)标准和ClinVar数据库进行分类。结果:35例LCA患者(女19例,男16例)。29%(10/35)患者有家族史,54%(19/35)患者有血亲史。最佳矫正视力平均值为2.48±0.59 logMAR。视网膜色素上皮异常和黄斑受累的发生率分别为83%(58/70)和23%(16/70)。在我们的队列中,LCA最常见的致病基因是:GUCY2D(20%, 7/35)、CRB1(14%, 5/35)、RPE65(11%, 4/35)、RPGRIP1(11%, 4/35)和LCA5(9%, 3/35)。常染色体隐性遗传占94%(33/35)。在CRB1(3/5)、NMNAT1(2/2)、RPE65、LCA5和RDH12患者中各有一例黄斑受累。在研究期间,基因检测费用从每次检测23,800印度卢比降至15,000印度卢比。结论:LCA病例基因筛查发现多种基因型,以GUCY2D最为常见。提高对基因检测的认识和降低成本将使患者和护理人员都受益。随着有希望的临床试验结果,基因分型对更好的患者选择和治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信