Views on cervical cancer screening among female caregivers at the Uganda cancer Institute

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Martin Origa , Anthony Kayiira , Rahel Ghebre , Lauren Bollinger , Sheila Irene Kisakye , Deanna Teoh
{"title":"Views on cervical cancer screening among female caregivers at the Uganda cancer Institute","authors":"Martin Origa ,&nbsp;Anthony Kayiira ,&nbsp;Rahel Ghebre ,&nbsp;Lauren Bollinger ,&nbsp;Sheila Irene Kisakye ,&nbsp;Deanna Teoh","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients admitted to Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) have their non-medical needs provided by caregivers called “attendants” who are predominantly female family members. This provides a unique opportunity to provide free screening among attendants during their free time at the hospital. The objective of this qualitative focus group study was to understand knowledge of and facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among attendants at the UCI. The goal is to use these data to inform a future opportunistic intervention. Female attendants 25 years of age or older were included in this focus group study. The focus group discussions explored knowledge of cervical cancer and screening modalities, health information sources, barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening, and potential use of mobile phone technology to share cervical cancer screening information among one’s social community. Data were analyzed using an inductive approach and thematic analysis. Results showed moderate understanding of risk factors for cervical cancer, supplemented by misinformation. Knowledge of symptoms of advanced cervical cancer was high. Most participants were aware that cervical cancer screening exists but knew little about screening modalities. Responses were mixed regarding preferred information sources, and included healthcare workers and facilities, radio and family members. Participants were enthusiastic about mobile phone messaging to provide information about screening but emphasized a need to catch their attention and incentivize screening with promise of good such as sugar, demonstrating prioritization of immediate needs over future cancer risk. These results will inform an intervention which aims to connect female caregivers with free screening available at the adjacent cancer prevention clinic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924002339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients admitted to Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) have their non-medical needs provided by caregivers called “attendants” who are predominantly female family members. This provides a unique opportunity to provide free screening among attendants during their free time at the hospital. The objective of this qualitative focus group study was to understand knowledge of and facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among attendants at the UCI. The goal is to use these data to inform a future opportunistic intervention. Female attendants 25 years of age or older were included in this focus group study. The focus group discussions explored knowledge of cervical cancer and screening modalities, health information sources, barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening, and potential use of mobile phone technology to share cervical cancer screening information among one’s social community. Data were analyzed using an inductive approach and thematic analysis. Results showed moderate understanding of risk factors for cervical cancer, supplemented by misinformation. Knowledge of symptoms of advanced cervical cancer was high. Most participants were aware that cervical cancer screening exists but knew little about screening modalities. Responses were mixed regarding preferred information sources, and included healthcare workers and facilities, radio and family members. Participants were enthusiastic about mobile phone messaging to provide information about screening but emphasized a need to catch their attention and incentivize screening with promise of good such as sugar, demonstrating prioritization of immediate needs over future cancer risk. These results will inform an intervention which aims to connect female caregivers with free screening available at the adjacent cancer prevention clinic.

Abstract Image

对乌干达癌症研究所女性护理人员宫颈癌筛查的看法。
乌干达癌症研究所收治的病人的非医疗需求由被称为“服务员”的护理人员提供,这些护理人员主要是女性家庭成员。这提供了一个独特的机会,在医院的空闲时间为医护人员提供免费筛查。本定性焦点小组研究的目的是了解UCI服务人员对宫颈癌筛查的知识、促进因素和障碍。目标是利用这些数据为未来的机会干预提供信息。25岁或以上的女性服务员被纳入这项焦点小组研究。焦点小组讨论探讨了子宫颈癌和筛查方式的知识、健康信息来源、子宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素,以及利用移动电话技术在社会群体中分享子宫颈癌筛查信息的可能性。数据分析采用归纳方法和专题分析。结果显示,人们对宫颈癌的危险因素了解适度,但也存在一些错误信息。对晚期子宫颈癌症状的了解程度很高。大多数参与者知道有子宫颈癌筛查,但对筛查方式知之甚少。对于首选的信息来源,反应不一,包括卫生保健工作者和设施、广播电台和家庭成员。参与者热衷于通过手机短信提供有关筛查的信息,但强调有必要引起他们的注意,并以糖等有益的承诺来激励筛查,表明将当前需求置于未来癌症风险之上。这些结果将为一项旨在将女性护理人员与邻近癌症预防诊所提供的免费筛查联系起来的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信