Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Melissa K Uveges, Hadley Stevens Smith, Stacey Pereira, Casie Genetti, Amy L McGuire, Alan H Beggs, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm
{"title":"Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project.","authors":"Melissa K Uveges, Hadley Stevens Smith, Stacey Pereira, Casie Genetti, Amy L McGuire, Alan H Beggs, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genomic sequencing of newborns can initiate disease surveillance and therapy for children and may identify at-risk relatives through reverse cascade testing. We explored genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing among families of newborns who underwent exome sequencing and were identified as having a risk for an autosomal dominant disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with parents of newborns enrolled in the BabySeq Project who had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant associated with an autosomal dominant childhood- and/or adult-onset disease returned. We used directed content analysis to derive themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 11 families, all first-degree relatives (n = 32, 100%), 29 second-degree relatives (76%), and 26 third-degree relatives (43%) were informed of their risk. All parents (n = 22, 69% of first-degree relatives), 4 (11%) second-degree relatives, and 1 (2%) third-degree relatives underwent cascade testing. Most parents preferred to handle risk communication themselves. Parents with positive cascade testing but no associated symptoms were less inclined to share findings with relatives but highly motivated to share results if the variant's associated disease severity was high, as perceived with adult-onset conditions. One new subtheme, family member traits, was identified and defined as a relative's propensity to anxiety/concern after risk communications but did not diminish risk communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings can inform more effective notification and testing practices for families of newborns at risk for hereditary genetic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101350"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2024.101350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Genomic sequencing of newborns can initiate disease surveillance and therapy for children and may identify at-risk relatives through reverse cascade testing. We explored genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing among families of newborns who underwent exome sequencing and were identified as having a risk for an autosomal dominant disease.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with parents of newborns enrolled in the BabySeq Project who had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant associated with an autosomal dominant childhood- and/or adult-onset disease returned. We used directed content analysis to derive themes.

Results: From 11 families, all first-degree relatives (n = 32, 100%), 29 second-degree relatives (76%), and 26 third-degree relatives (43%) were informed of their risk. All parents (n = 22, 69% of first-degree relatives), 4 (11%) second-degree relatives, and 1 (2%) third-degree relatives underwent cascade testing. Most parents preferred to handle risk communication themselves. Parents with positive cascade testing but no associated symptoms were less inclined to share findings with relatives but highly motivated to share results if the variant's associated disease severity was high, as perceived with adult-onset conditions. One new subtheme, family member traits, was identified and defined as a relative's propensity to anxiety/concern after risk communications but did not diminish risk communication.

Conclusion: Findings can inform more effective notification and testing practices for families of newborns at risk for hereditary genetic conditions.

BabySeq项目中的家庭遗传风险交流和反向级联检测。
目的:新生儿基因组测序(NBSeq)可以启动儿童疾病监测和治疗,并可通过反向级联检测识别高危亲属。我们在接受外显子组测序并确定有常染色体显性疾病风险的新生儿家庭中探讨遗传风险交流和反向级联测试。方法:我们对参加BabySeq项目的新生儿的父母进行了半结构化访谈,这些新生儿患有与常染色体显性(AD)儿童和/或成人发病相关的致病性或可能致病性(P/LP)变异。我们使用定向内容分析来派生主题。结果:11个家庭中,所有一级亲属(n=32, 100%)、29个二级亲属(SDRs)(76%)和26个三级亲属(TDRs)(43%)被告知其风险。所有的父母(n=22,占fdr的69%)、4名sdr(11%)和1名TDR(2%)进行了级联测试。大多数家长倾向于自己处理风险沟通。级联检测呈阳性但没有相关症状的父母不太倾向于与亲属分享结果,但如果变异相关疾病的严重程度很高,如在成人发病条件下感知到的那样,他们会非常积极地分享结果。一个新的子主题,“家庭成员特征”,被确定并定义为亲属在风险沟通后的焦虑/担忧倾向,但没有减少风险沟通。结论:研究结果可以为有遗传遗传病风险的新生儿家庭提供更有效的通知和检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信