Evaluating growth-factor release in leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin, advanced platelet-rich fibrin, and injectable platelet-rich fibrin protocols: a narrative review.

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Growth factors Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1080/08977194.2024.2432951
G A Alsabri, F van der Horst, S A Alkaabi, S A Alavi, T Forouzanfar, M N Helder
{"title":"Evaluating growth-factor release in leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin, advanced platelet-rich fibrin, and injectable platelet-rich fibrin protocols: a narrative review.","authors":"G A Alsabri, F van der Horst, S A Alkaabi, S A Alavi, T Forouzanfar, M N Helder","doi":"10.1080/08977194.2024.2432951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its introduction in 2001, multiple platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) centrifugation protocols have emerged, but the variations in growth factor release that result from these protocols remain unclear. This review aimed to evaluate growth factor release across three PRF protocols: leukocyte-PRF (L-PRF), advanced-PRF (A-PRF/+), and injectable-PRF (i-PRF). A comprehensive search was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases, identifying 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Due to significant heterogeneity in study designs and methodologies, a meta-analysis was not feasible. However, our findings suggest that lower-speed centrifugation protocols, such as A-PRF/+ and i-PRF, tend to provide a more uniform cell distribution and sustain higher growth factor release over time compared to the conventional L-PRF protocol. Despite these observations, the current evidence is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions about the growth factor release levels among L-PRF, A-PRF/+, and i-PRF. Further well-designed, comparative studies are required to clarify these differences and establish optimal protocols for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12782,"journal":{"name":"Growth factors","volume":" ","pages":"216-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth factors","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08977194.2024.2432951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its introduction in 2001, multiple platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) centrifugation protocols have emerged, but the variations in growth factor release that result from these protocols remain unclear. This review aimed to evaluate growth factor release across three PRF protocols: leukocyte-PRF (L-PRF), advanced-PRF (A-PRF/+), and injectable-PRF (i-PRF). A comprehensive search was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases, identifying 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Due to significant heterogeneity in study designs and methodologies, a meta-analysis was not feasible. However, our findings suggest that lower-speed centrifugation protocols, such as A-PRF/+ and i-PRF, tend to provide a more uniform cell distribution and sustain higher growth factor release over time compared to the conventional L-PRF protocol. Despite these observations, the current evidence is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions about the growth factor release levels among L-PRF, A-PRF/+, and i-PRF. Further well-designed, comparative studies are required to clarify these differences and establish optimal protocols for clinical use.

富白细胞和血小板纤维蛋白、晚期富血小板纤维蛋白和注射富血小板纤维蛋白方案中生长因子释放的评估:叙述性回顾
自2001年引入以来,出现了多种富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)离心方案,但这些方案导致生长因子释放的变化尚不清楚。本综述旨在评估三种PRF方案的生长因子释放:白细胞PRF (L-PRF)、晚期PRF (A-PRF/+)和注射PRF (i-PRF)。使用MEDLINE和Embase数据库进行全面检索,确定了14项符合纳入标准的研究。由于研究设计和方法的显著异质性,meta分析是不可行的。然而,我们的研究结果表明,与传统的L-PRF方案相比,低速离心方案,如a - prf /+和i-PRF,倾向于提供更均匀的细胞分布,并随着时间的推移维持更高的生长因子释放。尽管有这些观察结果,目前的证据还不足以得出关于L-PRF、A-PRF/+和i-PRF中生长因子释放水平的明确结论。需要进一步精心设计的比较研究来澄清这些差异,并建立临床使用的最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Growth factors
Growth factors 生物-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Growth Factors is an international and interdisciplinary vehicle publishing new knowledge and findings on the regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. The Journal will publish research papers, short communications and reviews on current developments in cell biology, biochemistry, physiology or pharmacology of growth factors, cytokines or hormones which improve our understanding of biology or medicine. Among the various fields of study topics of particular interest include: •Stem cell biology •Growth factor physiology •Structure-activity relationships •Drug development studies •Clinical applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信