Using T-Cell Subsets to Better Characterize Immunoresiliency and Immunodeficiency in Patients with Recurrent Infections.

IF 3.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Justine Hung, Bryan Vonasek, Daniel Rosenberg, Tri Vo, Rob Striker
{"title":"Using T-Cell Subsets to Better Characterize Immunoresiliency and Immunodeficiency in Patients with Recurrent Infections.","authors":"Justine Hung, Bryan Vonasek, Daniel Rosenberg, Tri Vo, Rob Striker","doi":"10.3390/idr16060097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disease (CVID) and other immunodeficiencies can present in subtle and variable ways. Whether or not a genetic lesion can be identified, there are not well understood biomarkers that quantitatively describe how severe a deficiency is. Here we discuss two possible ranking systems, CD4/CD8 T cell ratios and Immune Health Grades, and how such data maybe applicable to some immunodeficiencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is not a systematic review, but we identify papers relating to immunodeficiencies with enough data to comment on the CD4/CD8 and Immune Health Grade. We also summarized relevant data publicly available from USIDNET, a website that compiles data on immunodeficiencies, and provide two new cases that illustrate ways that this information can alter clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We review the HIV literature on CD4/CD8 T cell data and how this correlates with both immunologic function and comorbidity better than CD4 count alone. The ratio aslso relates to a new system called Immune Health Grades (IHG) derived from young adult to elderly subjects from many NIH cohorts without HIV. CVID is often thought of as an antibody problem, but in fact most patients also have low CD4/CD8 ratio and other cellular abnormalities. We review IDNET to categorize nine molecular immunodeficiencies including two subcategories of CVID into low, normal, or high ratios. Finally, we present two new cases in the literature of patients with recurrent infection and discuss how viewing the cases through the \"lens\" of CD4/CD8 ratio and IHG can facilitate clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emerging data suggests at least some immunodeficiencies can be grouped by how abnormal their CD4/CD8 ratio or IHG. This represents a clinically available biomarker that can be tracked to see if the condition is worsening or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"16 6","pages":"1230-1239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11675865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16060097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disease (CVID) and other immunodeficiencies can present in subtle and variable ways. Whether or not a genetic lesion can be identified, there are not well understood biomarkers that quantitatively describe how severe a deficiency is. Here we discuss two possible ranking systems, CD4/CD8 T cell ratios and Immune Health Grades, and how such data maybe applicable to some immunodeficiencies.

Methods: This is not a systematic review, but we identify papers relating to immunodeficiencies with enough data to comment on the CD4/CD8 and Immune Health Grade. We also summarized relevant data publicly available from USIDNET, a website that compiles data on immunodeficiencies, and provide two new cases that illustrate ways that this information can alter clinical assessment.

Results: We review the HIV literature on CD4/CD8 T cell data and how this correlates with both immunologic function and comorbidity better than CD4 count alone. The ratio aslso relates to a new system called Immune Health Grades (IHG) derived from young adult to elderly subjects from many NIH cohorts without HIV. CVID is often thought of as an antibody problem, but in fact most patients also have low CD4/CD8 ratio and other cellular abnormalities. We review IDNET to categorize nine molecular immunodeficiencies including two subcategories of CVID into low, normal, or high ratios. Finally, we present two new cases in the literature of patients with recurrent infection and discuss how viewing the cases through the "lens" of CD4/CD8 ratio and IHG can facilitate clinical decisions.

Conclusions: Emerging data suggests at least some immunodeficiencies can be grouped by how abnormal their CD4/CD8 ratio or IHG. This represents a clinically available biomarker that can be tracked to see if the condition is worsening or not.

利用t细胞亚群更好地表征复发性感染患者的免疫弹性和免疫缺陷。
背景/目的:常见的可变免疫缺陷病(CVID)和其他免疫缺陷可以以微妙和可变的方式出现。无论是否可以识别遗传病变,目前还没有很好理解的生物标志物来定量描述缺陷的严重程度。在这里,我们讨论两种可能的排名系统,CD4/CD8 T细胞比率和免疫健康等级,以及这些数据如何适用于某些免疫缺陷。方法:这不是一项系统综述,但我们确定了与免疫缺陷相关的论文,这些论文有足够的数据来评论CD4/CD8和免疫健康等级。我们还总结了从USIDNET(一个汇编免疫缺陷数据的网站)公开获得的相关数据,并提供了两个新病例,说明这些信息可以改变临床评估的方式。结果:我们回顾了关于CD4/CD8 T细胞数据的HIV文献,以及它如何比单独CD4计数更好地与免疫功能和合并症相关。该比率还与一种新的系统有关,称为免疫健康等级(IHG),该系统从许多NIH未感染艾滋病毒的队列中从年轻人到老年受试者中得出。CVID通常被认为是抗体问题,但实际上大多数患者也有低CD4/CD8比率和其他细胞异常。我们回顾IDNET将9种分子免疫缺陷分为低比例、正常比例和高比例,其中包括CVID的两个亚类。最后,我们介绍了文献中两例复发性感染患者的新病例,并讨论了如何通过CD4/CD8比率和IHG的“透镜”来看待这些病例,以促进临床决策。结论:新出现的数据表明,至少一些免疫缺陷可以通过CD4/CD8比值或IHG异常程度进行分组。这代表了一种临床可用的生物标志物,可以跟踪观察病情是否恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信