QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay for the evaluation of cellular immunity after immunization with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Maria-Myrto Dourdouna, Georgia Kourlaba, Athanasios Michos
{"title":"QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay for the evaluation of cellular immunity after immunization with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maria-Myrto Dourdouna, Georgia Kourlaba, Athanasios Michos","doi":"10.1007/s12026-024-09570-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the virus-specific T-cell response after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 interferon-γ release assay. A search was conducted (June 8, 2023) in the PUBMED, SCOPUS, and medRxiv databases, to identify studies reporting the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 (Starter (two antigen tubes) or Starter + Extended Pack (three antigen tubes), cut-off ≥ 0.15 IU/mL) positivity rate (PR) in immunocompetent adults, following the administration of two or three COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses. Study quality was evaluated with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Eleven eligible studies (with 5-73 vaccinated immunocompetent participants) were identified. For COVID-19-naïve participants, ≤ 3 months after the second dose, the pooled PR (random-effects model) was 86 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 78-95%). Comparing the Starter vs. the Starter + Extended Pack, a significant difference in PRs was detected (80.6% vs. 100% p-value < 0.001). At 3-6 and >6 months after the second dose and ≥ 3 months after the third dose, the pooled PRs were 59% (95% CI 45-72%), 79% (95% CI 66-92%), and 66% (95% CI 50-82%), respectively. For convalescent participants, ≥ 6 months after the third dose, the pooled PR was 81% (95% CI 67-95%). Limitations include heterogeneity and a small number of studies, at some timepoints. In conclusion, following the second or third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose, QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 detected positive responses in a certain percentage of the vaccinees, possibly because of waning immunity, reduced assay sensitivity, or lack of T-cell response induction in some vaccinees. The detection of positive responses was higher when the Starter + Extended Pack was used. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023431315.</p>","PeriodicalId":13389,"journal":{"name":"Immunologic Research","volume":"73 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunologic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-024-09570-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the virus-specific T-cell response after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 interferon-γ release assay. A search was conducted (June 8, 2023) in the PUBMED, SCOPUS, and medRxiv databases, to identify studies reporting the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 (Starter (two antigen tubes) or Starter + Extended Pack (three antigen tubes), cut-off ≥ 0.15 IU/mL) positivity rate (PR) in immunocompetent adults, following the administration of two or three COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses. Study quality was evaluated with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Eleven eligible studies (with 5-73 vaccinated immunocompetent participants) were identified. For COVID-19-naïve participants, ≤ 3 months after the second dose, the pooled PR (random-effects model) was 86 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 78-95%). Comparing the Starter vs. the Starter + Extended Pack, a significant difference in PRs was detected (80.6% vs. 100% p-value < 0.001). At 3-6 and >6 months after the second dose and ≥ 3 months after the third dose, the pooled PRs were 59% (95% CI 45-72%), 79% (95% CI 66-92%), and 66% (95% CI 50-82%), respectively. For convalescent participants, ≥ 6 months after the third dose, the pooled PR was 81% (95% CI 67-95%). Limitations include heterogeneity and a small number of studies, at some timepoints. In conclusion, following the second or third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose, QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 detected positive responses in a certain percentage of the vaccinees, possibly because of waning immunity, reduced assay sensitivity, or lack of T-cell response induction in some vaccinees. The detection of positive responses was higher when the Starter + Extended Pack was used. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023431315.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunologic Research
Immunologic Research 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH represents a unique medium for the presentation, interpretation, and clarification of complex scientific data. Information is presented in the form of interpretive synthesis reviews, original research articles, symposia, editorials, and theoretical essays. The scope of coverage extends to cellular immunology, immunogenetics, molecular and structural immunology, immunoregulation and autoimmunity, immunopathology, tumor immunology, host defense and microbial immunity, including viral immunology, immunohematology, mucosal immunity, complement, transplantation immunology, clinical immunology, neuroimmunology, immunoendocrinology, immunotoxicology, translational immunology, and history of immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信