Clinical Significance of Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Fatty Liver.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hao-Yue Sun, Le-Can Wu, Meng-Jie Xu, En-Dian Zheng, Ying-Cong Yu, Yi Ye
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Fatty Liver.","authors":"Hao-Yue Sun, Le-Can Wu, Meng-Jie Xu, En-Dian Zheng, Ying-Cong Yu, Yi Ye","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S494810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the alterations in serum bile acid profiles among individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and alcoholic fatty liver (AFL) and evaluate their clinical significance when combined with liver enzyme levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 110 individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver 58 individuals and alcoholic fatty liver 52 individuals) was selected from the Department of Gastroenterology at Wenzhou People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022, while a control group of 66 healthy individuals was recruited from the hospital's health examination center during the same period. Clinical data and blood samples were collected from all participants. Serum bile acid profiles were quantified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis was conducted in conjunction with liver enzyme indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the NAFL group, GCA, TCA, and TCDCA levels were significantly elevated compared to the control group, with GCA (AUC 0.754, sensitivity 0.707, specificity 0.712), TCA (AUC 0.770, sensitivity 0.724, specificity 0.712), and TCDCA (AUC 0.782, sensitivity 0.810, specificity 0.652) showing strong diagnostic value. In the AFL group, TCDCA, TCA, GCA, TUDCA, and GUDCA were significantly elevated, with AUC values ranging from 0.848 to 0.912. Among these, TUDCA had the highest sensitivity (0.885) and specificity (0.773) for AFL diagnosis. TUDCA (sensitivity 0.615, specificity 0.897) was the key bile acid distinguishing AFL from NAFL, with an optimal cut-off of 36.33 nmol/L. These bile acids show significant diagnostic potential for differentiating NAFL and AFL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bile acid profiles in both NAFL and AFL patients show changes, which hold potential clinical significance and may serve as serum biomarkers to differentiate NAFL from AFL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"17 ","pages":"4843-4856"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S494810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the alterations in serum bile acid profiles among individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and alcoholic fatty liver (AFL) and evaluate their clinical significance when combined with liver enzyme levels.

Methods: A cohort of 110 individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver 58 individuals and alcoholic fatty liver 52 individuals) was selected from the Department of Gastroenterology at Wenzhou People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022, while a control group of 66 healthy individuals was recruited from the hospital's health examination center during the same period. Clinical data and blood samples were collected from all participants. Serum bile acid profiles were quantified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis was conducted in conjunction with liver enzyme indicators.

Results: In the NAFL group, GCA, TCA, and TCDCA levels were significantly elevated compared to the control group, with GCA (AUC 0.754, sensitivity 0.707, specificity 0.712), TCA (AUC 0.770, sensitivity 0.724, specificity 0.712), and TCDCA (AUC 0.782, sensitivity 0.810, specificity 0.652) showing strong diagnostic value. In the AFL group, TCDCA, TCA, GCA, TUDCA, and GUDCA were significantly elevated, with AUC values ranging from 0.848 to 0.912. Among these, TUDCA had the highest sensitivity (0.885) and specificity (0.773) for AFL diagnosis. TUDCA (sensitivity 0.615, specificity 0.897) was the key bile acid distinguishing AFL from NAFL, with an optimal cut-off of 36.33 nmol/L. These bile acids show significant diagnostic potential for differentiating NAFL and AFL.

Conclusion: The bile acid profiles in both NAFL and AFL patients show changes, which hold potential clinical significance and may serve as serum biomarkers to differentiate NAFL from AFL.

脂肪肝患者血清胆汁酸谱的临床意义。
目的:本研究旨在探讨脂肪肝(包括非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFL)和酒精性脂肪肝(AFL)患者血清胆汁酸谱的变化,并结合肝酶水平评价其临床意义。方法:选取2021年1月- 2022年12月温州市人民医院消化内科脂肪肝患者110例(其中非酒精性脂肪肝患者58例,酒精性脂肪肝患者52例),同时选取同一时期温州市人民医院体检中心健康人群66例作为对照组。收集所有参与者的临床资料和血液样本。采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)定量测定血清胆汁酸谱。结合肝酶指标进行统计分析。结果:NAFL组GCA、TCA、TCDCA水平较对照组明显升高,其中GCA (AUC 0.754,敏感性0.707,特异性0.712)、TCA (AUC 0.770,敏感性0.724,特异性0.712)、TCDCA (AUC 0.782,敏感性0.810,特异性0.652)具有较强的诊断价值。AFL组TCDCA、TCA、GCA、TUDCA、GUDCA显著升高,AUC值在0.848 ~ 0.912之间。其中,TUDCA对AFL诊断的敏感性(0.885)和特异性(0.773)最高。TUDCA(敏感性0.615,特异性0.897)是鉴别AFL和NAFL的关键胆汁酸,最佳临界值为36.33 nmol/L。这些胆汁酸对鉴别NAFL和AFL具有重要的诊断潜力。结论:NAFL和AFL患者胆汁酸谱均有变化,具有潜在的临床意义,可作为区分NAFL和AFL的血清生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
431
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信