Outcomes of Flapless Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Crown Lengthening: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Haitham Elafifi Ebeid, Walid Altayeb, Isabel Parada Avendaño, Daniel Abad-Sanchez, Josep Arnabat-Domínguez
{"title":"Outcomes of Flapless Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Laser-Assisted Crown Lengthening: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Haitham Elafifi Ebeid, Walid Altayeb, Isabel Parada Avendaño, Daniel Abad-Sanchez, Josep Arnabat-Domínguez","doi":"10.3390/dj12120418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) and erbium, chromium/yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) lasers have been introduced as another possibility to perform less-invasive flapless (FL) crown-lengthening (CL) procedures.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this review is to describe the outcomes and complications of this approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to retrieve clinical studies and case reports that analyze different variables related to laser-assisted flapless crown lengthening and report their outcomes in terms of gingival margin level stability (GMLS), and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five studies were included in the final qualitative analysis; two of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the rest were case reports. The common variable measured in all studies was the GMLS, finding good stability in the FL groups at 3 months follow-up, but more tissue rebound was observed in patients with the thick biotype. Other variables were reported in different articles as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bone margin level, biotype, bleeding on probing (BP), probing depth (PD), and postoperative pain by the numeric rating scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There are a wide range of heterogenous clinical variables used to evaluate outcomes, as well as variations in the type of laser used and its parameters in terms of the applied technique. However, most analyzed studies showed better GMLS for the flapless technique, as well as less postoperative inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The included studies showed promising clinical outcomes in the FL laser-assisted CL groups concerning GMLS at the 3-month postoperative period. However, more RCTs are needed with respect to fixed laser parameters and patient biotype selection to reach a definitive clinical protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12120418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) and erbium, chromium/yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) lasers have been introduced as another possibility to perform less-invasive flapless (FL) crown-lengthening (CL) procedures.

Objectives: The aim of this review is to describe the outcomes and complications of this approach.

Materials and methods: A literature review was conducted to retrieve clinical studies and case reports that analyze different variables related to laser-assisted flapless crown lengthening and report their outcomes in terms of gingival margin level stability (GMLS), and postoperative complications.

Results: A total of five studies were included in the final qualitative analysis; two of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the rest were case reports. The common variable measured in all studies was the GMLS, finding good stability in the FL groups at 3 months follow-up, but more tissue rebound was observed in patients with the thick biotype. Other variables were reported in different articles as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bone margin level, biotype, bleeding on probing (BP), probing depth (PD), and postoperative pain by the numeric rating scale (NRS).

Discussion: There are a wide range of heterogenous clinical variables used to evaluate outcomes, as well as variations in the type of laser used and its parameters in terms of the applied technique. However, most analyzed studies showed better GMLS for the flapless technique, as well as less postoperative inflammation.

Conclusions: The included studies showed promising clinical outcomes in the FL laser-assisted CL groups concerning GMLS at the 3-month postoperative period. However, more RCTs are needed with respect to fixed laser parameters and patient biotype selection to reach a definitive clinical protocol.

无瓣Er:YAG和Er,Cr:YSGG激光辅助冠延长的疗效:系统评价。
近年来,掺铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)和掺铒铬/钇钪镓石榴石(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光器被引入,作为进行微创无瓣(FL)冠延长(CL)手术的另一种可能性。目的:本综述的目的是描述这种方法的结果和并发症。材料和方法:通过文献回顾,检索临床研究和病例报告,分析与激光辅助无瓣冠延长相关的不同变量,并报告其在龈缘水平稳定性(GMLS)和术后并发症方面的结果。结果:最终定性分析共纳入5项研究;其中2项为随机对照试验(rct),其余为病例报告。所有研究中测量的共同变量是GMLS,在随访3个月时,FL组的稳定性较好,但在厚型患者中观察到更多的组织反弹。其他变量在不同的文章中报道,如斑块指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、骨缘水平、生物型、探诊出血(BP)、探诊深度(PD)和术后疼痛的数值评定量表(NRS)。讨论:有广泛的异质临床变量用于评估结果,以及使用的激光类型和应用技术方面的参数的变化。然而,大多数分析研究显示无瓣技术的GMLS更好,术后炎症更少。结论:纳入的研究显示FL激光辅助CL组在术后3个月的GMLS方面有很好的临床结果。然而,需要更多关于固定激光参数和患者生物型选择的随机对照试验来达成明确的临床方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信