Evaluation of the ETV success score and its predictive value in pediatric occlusive hydrocephalus: implications for patient counseling.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Matthias Krause, Daniel Gräfe, Roman Metzger, Christoph J Griessenauer, Janina Gburek-Augustat
{"title":"Evaluation of the ETV success score and its predictive value in pediatric occlusive hydrocephalus: implications for patient counseling.","authors":"Matthias Krause, Daniel Gräfe, Roman Metzger, Christoph J Griessenauer, Janina Gburek-Augustat","doi":"10.1007/s00381-024-06728-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) is a well-established treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus, particularly in cases of aqueductal stenosis. The ETV Success Score (ETVSS) is a predictive tool widely used to estimate the likelihood of ETV success based on factors like age. Its accuracy, especially in infants under 3 months, is still debated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study evaluates the age-dependency of ETV success in 54 pediatric patients compared to ETVSS predictions. Patients were divided into age and pathology groups according to Kulkarni. Success was defined according the ETVSS criteria. Minimum follow-up was 12 months and included MRI to demonstrate a flow void at the floor or the third ventricle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our institutional data revealed a higher overall success rate SR (88%) compared to the ETVSS-predicted rate of 73%. Despite small numbers within subgroups, especially in very young children < 1 month, the success rate was higher than predicted by ETVSS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results show significantly higher actual SR across all age groups compared to ETVSS predictions (p = 0.035) when selected and performed by an experienced physician. The age groups > 1 year had significantly higher SR close to 100% (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0038, respectively). This suggests that ETV may be underutilized, particularly in infants, where predicted success rates are pessimistic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ETVSS is a useful tool for counseling of parents, but differences in institution-specific outcomes should not be neglected. Depending on that, physicians might opt in favor of ETV as primary treatment in occlusive hydrocephalus of very young children, counterbalancing risks and sequalae of VP-shunting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9970,"journal":{"name":"Child's Nervous System","volume":"41 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06728-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) is a well-established treatment for pediatric hydrocephalus, particularly in cases of aqueductal stenosis. The ETV Success Score (ETVSS) is a predictive tool widely used to estimate the likelihood of ETV success based on factors like age. Its accuracy, especially in infants under 3 months, is still debated.

Patients and methods: This study evaluates the age-dependency of ETV success in 54 pediatric patients compared to ETVSS predictions. Patients were divided into age and pathology groups according to Kulkarni. Success was defined according the ETVSS criteria. Minimum follow-up was 12 months and included MRI to demonstrate a flow void at the floor or the third ventricle.

Results: Our institutional data revealed a higher overall success rate SR (88%) compared to the ETVSS-predicted rate of 73%. Despite small numbers within subgroups, especially in very young children < 1 month, the success rate was higher than predicted by ETVSS.

Discussion: Our results show significantly higher actual SR across all age groups compared to ETVSS predictions (p = 0.035) when selected and performed by an experienced physician. The age groups > 1 year had significantly higher SR close to 100% (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0038, respectively). This suggests that ETV may be underutilized, particularly in infants, where predicted success rates are pessimistic.

Conclusion: ETVSS is a useful tool for counseling of parents, but differences in institution-specific outcomes should not be neglected. Depending on that, physicians might opt in favor of ETV as primary treatment in occlusive hydrocephalus of very young children, counterbalancing risks and sequalae of VP-shunting.

儿童闭塞性脑积水ETV成功评分的评估及其预测价值:对患者咨询的意义。
导言:内镜下第三脑室造口术(ETV)是一种成熟的治疗小儿脑积水的方法,特别是在输水管道狭窄的情况下。ETV成功评分(ETVSS)是一种预测工具,广泛用于估计基于年龄等因素的ETV成功的可能性。它的准确性,特别是在3个月以下的婴儿中,仍然存在争议。患者和方法:本研究评估了54例儿科患者ETV成功与ETVSS预测的年龄依赖性。根据Kulkarni将患者分为年龄组和病理组。根据ETVSS标准定义成功。最小随访时间为12个月,包括MRI显示底脑室或第三脑室有血流空洞。结果:我们的机构数据显示,与etvss预测的73%的成功率相比,总体成功率SR(88%)更高。讨论:我们的结果显示,当由经验丰富的医生选择和执行时,与ETVSS预测相比,所有年龄组的实际SR显着更高(p = 0.035)。结论:ETVSS是一种有效的家长咨询工具,但不应忽视机构特定结果的差异。基于此,医生可能会选择ETV作为幼儿闭塞性脑积水的主要治疗方法,以平衡vp分流的风险和后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child's Nervous System
Child's Nervous System 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been expanded to encompass all aspects of pediatric neurosciences concerning the developmental and acquired abnormalities of the nervous system and its coverings, functional disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, basic and clinical neuro-oncology, rehabilitation and trauma. Global pediatric neurosurgery is an additional field of interest that will be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信