Reusing routine electronic health record data for nationwide COVID-19 surveillance in nursing homes: barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Y Wieland-Jorna, R A Verheij, A L Francke, R Coppen, S C de Greeff, A Elffers, M G Oosterveld-Vlug
{"title":"Reusing routine electronic health record data for nationwide COVID-19 surveillance in nursing homes: barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned.","authors":"Y Wieland-Jorna, R A Verheij, A L Francke, R Coppen, S C de Greeff, A Elffers, M G Oosterveld-Vlug","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02818-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, little was known about the spread of COVID-19 in Dutch nursing homes while older people were particularly at risk of severe symptoms. Therefore, attempts were made to develop a nationwide COVID-19 repository based on routinely recorded data in the electronic health records (EHRs) of nursing home residents. This study aims to describe the facilitators and barriers encountered during the development of the repository and the lessons learned regarding the reuse of EHR data for surveillance and research purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using inductive content analysis, we reviewed 325 documents written and saved during the development of the COVID-19 repository. This included meeting minutes, e-mails, notes made after phone calls with stakeholders, and documents developed to inform stakeholders. We also assessed the fitness for purpose of the data by evaluating the completeness, plausibility, conformity, and timeliness of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key facilitators found in this study were: 1) inter-organizational collaboration to create support; 2) early and close involvement of EHR software vendors; and 3) coordination and communication between partners. Key barriers that hampered the fitness of EHR data for surveillance were: 1) changes over time in national SARS-CoV-2 testing policy; 2) differences between EHR systems; 3) increased workload in nursing homes and lack of perceived urgency; 4) uncertainty regarding the legal requirements for extracting EHR data; 5) the short notice at which complete and understandable information about the repository had to be developed; and 6) lack of clarity about the differences between various COVID-19 monitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the urgent need for information on the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among nursing home residents, setting up a repository based on EHR data proved challenging. The facilitators and barriers found in this study affected the extent to which the data could be used. We formulated nine lessons learned for developing future repositories based on EHR data for surveillance and research purposes. These lessons were in three main areas: legal framework, contextual circumstances, and quality of the data. Currently, these lessons are being applied in setting up a new registry in the nursing home sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02818-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, little was known about the spread of COVID-19 in Dutch nursing homes while older people were particularly at risk of severe symptoms. Therefore, attempts were made to develop a nationwide COVID-19 repository based on routinely recorded data in the electronic health records (EHRs) of nursing home residents. This study aims to describe the facilitators and barriers encountered during the development of the repository and the lessons learned regarding the reuse of EHR data for surveillance and research purposes.

Methods: Using inductive content analysis, we reviewed 325 documents written and saved during the development of the COVID-19 repository. This included meeting minutes, e-mails, notes made after phone calls with stakeholders, and documents developed to inform stakeholders. We also assessed the fitness for purpose of the data by evaluating the completeness, plausibility, conformity, and timeliness of the data.

Results: Key facilitators found in this study were: 1) inter-organizational collaboration to create support; 2) early and close involvement of EHR software vendors; and 3) coordination and communication between partners. Key barriers that hampered the fitness of EHR data for surveillance were: 1) changes over time in national SARS-CoV-2 testing policy; 2) differences between EHR systems; 3) increased workload in nursing homes and lack of perceived urgency; 4) uncertainty regarding the legal requirements for extracting EHR data; 5) the short notice at which complete and understandable information about the repository had to be developed; and 6) lack of clarity about the differences between various COVID-19 monitors.

Conclusions: Despite the urgent need for information on the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among nursing home residents, setting up a repository based on EHR data proved challenging. The facilitators and barriers found in this study affected the extent to which the data could be used. We formulated nine lessons learned for developing future repositories based on EHR data for surveillance and research purposes. These lessons were in three main areas: legal framework, contextual circumstances, and quality of the data. Currently, these lessons are being applied in setting up a new registry in the nursing home sector.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信