Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Restrictive and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Single Center Experience.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002322
Diana L Geisser, Bryan D Siegel, Ryan L Kobayashi, Christina J VanderPluym, Francis Fynn-Thompson, Ravi R Thiagarajan, Katie M Moynihan
{"title":"Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Restrictive and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Single Center Experience.","authors":"Diana L Geisser, Bryan D Siegel, Ryan L Kobayashi, Christina J VanderPluym, Francis Fynn-Thompson, Ravi R Thiagarajan, Katie M Moynihan","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) were previously considered poor candidates for mechanical circulatory support due to technical limitations related to restrictive ventricular physiology and small ventricular size, limiting the ability to provide adequate flows and decompress the heart. Literature examining use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in this population consists of a single case series reporting no survivors. We report our experience providing ECMO in children with RCM or HCM at a large pediatric quaternary cardiac center. Between 2012 and 2022, five patients (four RCM, one HCM) were supported with seven ECMO runs. All patients were cannulated to ECMO with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Four patients survived decannulation from ECMO (median support time 209 hr, interquartile range [IQR]: 48-265), of which three (60%) survived to hospital discharge after transitioning to a ventricular assist device (VAD) and undergoing orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). Two remain alive at long-term follow-up with normal or mildly impaired functional status. These findings suggest that while RCM and HCM have traditionally been considered contraindications to ECMO due to adverse outcomes, this population may be successfully supported with ECMO with survival comparable to international registry outcomes in select centers where VAD as a bridge to OHT is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"e110-e114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) were previously considered poor candidates for mechanical circulatory support due to technical limitations related to restrictive ventricular physiology and small ventricular size, limiting the ability to provide adequate flows and decompress the heart. Literature examining use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in this population consists of a single case series reporting no survivors. We report our experience providing ECMO in children with RCM or HCM at a large pediatric quaternary cardiac center. Between 2012 and 2022, five patients (four RCM, one HCM) were supported with seven ECMO runs. All patients were cannulated to ECMO with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Four patients survived decannulation from ECMO (median support time 209 hr, interquartile range [IQR]: 48-265), of which three (60%) survived to hospital discharge after transitioning to a ventricular assist device (VAD) and undergoing orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). Two remain alive at long-term follow-up with normal or mildly impaired functional status. These findings suggest that while RCM and HCM have traditionally been considered contraindications to ECMO due to adverse outcomes, this population may be successfully supported with ECMO with survival comparable to international registry outcomes in select centers where VAD as a bridge to OHT is available.

限制性和肥厚性心肌病的儿科体外膜氧合:单中心经验。
限制性心肌病(RCM)和肥厚性心肌病(HCM)患者以前被认为不适合机械循环支持,因为与限制性心室生理学和小心室大小相关的技术限制限制了提供足够血流和心脏减压的能力。文献检查使用体外膜氧合(ECMO)在这一人群包括一个单一的病例系列报告没有幸存者。我们报告了我们在一家大型儿科四级心脏中心为RCM或HCM患儿提供ECMO的经验。2012年至2022年期间,5名患者(4名RCM, 1名HCM)接受了7次ECMO。所有患者插管至ECMO并持续心肺复苏。4例患者在ECMO脱管后存活(中位支持时间209小时,四分位间距[IQR]: 48-265),其中3例(60%)在过渡到心室辅助装置(VAD)并接受原位心脏移植(OHT)后存活至出院。其中2例在长期随访中仍然存活,功能状态正常或轻度受损。这些发现表明,虽然RCM和HCM由于不良结果传统上被认为是ECMO的禁忌症,但在选择VAD作为OHT的桥梁的中心,这些人群可能成功地支持ECMO,其生存率与国际注册结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信