Tips and Tricks to Facilitate Late Open Surgical Conversion after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysms Repair.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lazar B Davidovic, Stefan Ducic, Andrija Roganovic, David Matejevic, Ognjen Kostic
{"title":"Tips and Tricks to Facilitate Late Open Surgical Conversion after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysms Repair.","authors":"Lazar B Davidovic, Stefan Ducic, Andrija Roganovic, David Matejevic, Ognjen Kostic","doi":"10.62713/aic.3487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular repair has significantly improved the treatment of aortic aneurysms, particularly in older and high-risk patients. However, many studies have not found significant differences in long-term outcomes when comparing open and endovascular repair methods. Additionally, endovascular repair is associated with a higher rate of aortic-related reinterventions compared to open repair (OR), sometimes necessitating late open surgical conversion (LOSC). The increasing number of endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs exposes vascular surgeons to a growing number of patients requiring late open surgical conversion (LOSC) after previous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). LOSC following endovascular procedures is associated with higher perioperative mortality and complication rates compared to primary open repair of aortic aneurysms. This review summarizes the current knowledge, indications, possibilities, and techniques for LOSC after initial endovascular procedures. While the incidence of complications requiring LOSC remains relatively low, the number of endovascular procedures performed has increased significantly over the last decade, suggesting a rise in LOSC procedures as well. Due to the complexity involved, LOSC procedures should be performed in high-volume centers by highly experienced vascular surgeons. This underlines the importance of educating the younger generation of vascular surgeons in both endovascular and open aortic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 6","pages":"1076-1084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular repair has significantly improved the treatment of aortic aneurysms, particularly in older and high-risk patients. However, many studies have not found significant differences in long-term outcomes when comparing open and endovascular repair methods. Additionally, endovascular repair is associated with a higher rate of aortic-related reinterventions compared to open repair (OR), sometimes necessitating late open surgical conversion (LOSC). The increasing number of endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs exposes vascular surgeons to a growing number of patients requiring late open surgical conversion (LOSC) after previous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). LOSC following endovascular procedures is associated with higher perioperative mortality and complication rates compared to primary open repair of aortic aneurysms. This review summarizes the current knowledge, indications, possibilities, and techniques for LOSC after initial endovascular procedures. While the incidence of complications requiring LOSC remains relatively low, the number of endovascular procedures performed has increased significantly over the last decade, suggesting a rise in LOSC procedures as well. Due to the complexity involved, LOSC procedures should be performed in high-volume centers by highly experienced vascular surgeons. This underlines the importance of educating the younger generation of vascular surgeons in both endovascular and open aortic surgery.

促进血管内动脉瘤修复后晚期开放手术转换的提示和技巧。
血管内修复显著改善了主动脉瘤的治疗,特别是在老年和高危患者中。然而,许多研究并没有发现在比较开放和血管内修复方法时的长期结果有显著差异。此外,与开放式修复(OR)相比,血管内修复与主动脉相关的再介入率更高,有时需要后期开放式手术转换(LOSC)。越来越多的血管内动脉瘤修复使血管外科医生面临越来越多的患者在先前的血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)或胸椎血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)后需要后期开放手术转换(LOSC)。与初次切开修复主动脉瘤相比,血管内手术后的失活与更高的围手术期死亡率和并发症发生率相关。本文综述了目前血管内手术后LOSC的知识、适应症、可能性和技术。虽然需要LOSC的并发症发生率仍然相对较低,但在过去十年中,血管内手术的数量显著增加,这也表明LOSC手术的数量也在增加。由于涉及的复杂性,失稳手术应由经验丰富的血管外科医生在大容量中心进行。这强调了对年轻一代血管外科医生进行血管内和主动脉切开手术教育的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信