He Jiao MM , Xiankun Liu MD , Yiming Bai MD , Lin Cong MM , Yunpeng Bai MD , Zhigang Guo MD
{"title":"Gender Differences in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"He Jiao MM , Xiankun Liu MD , Yiming Bai MD , Lin Cong MM , Yunpeng Bai MD , Zhigang Guo MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We aimed to undertake a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate gender-based differences for patients with acute type A aortic dissection. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2000 to 2023) for studies reporting gender-related discrepancies in clinical presentation, in-hospital management, and/or outcomes. Study effects were assessed using mean difference or risk ratio (RR) as aggregated estimates. Besides, individual patient-level data on survival were reestablished to form gender-related Kaplan–Meier curves to evaluate long-term survival outcome. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524125). The 21 studies were analyzed, comprising 6,728 women and 12,839 men. Women had lower risks of postoperative acute kidney injury (RR 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.00, p = 0.049) and reoperation (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99, p = 0.024) but a higher perioperative mortality (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.18, p = 0.005) than men. In addition, the overall survival was poorer in women (p <0.001), with 10-year survival rates of 66.5% for men and 60.0% for women. In conclusion, acute type A aortic dissection presents gender differences, with women facing higher perioperative and long-term mortality despite lower acute kidney injury and reoperation risks, suggesting a need for tailored management and prevention strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914924008804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We aimed to undertake a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate gender-based differences for patients with acute type A aortic dissection. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2000 to 2023) for studies reporting gender-related discrepancies in clinical presentation, in-hospital management, and/or outcomes. Study effects were assessed using mean difference or risk ratio (RR) as aggregated estimates. Besides, individual patient-level data on survival were reestablished to form gender-related Kaplan–Meier curves to evaluate long-term survival outcome. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024524125). The 21 studies were analyzed, comprising 6,728 women and 12,839 men. Women had lower risks of postoperative acute kidney injury (RR 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.00, p = 0.049) and reoperation (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99, p = 0.024) but a higher perioperative mortality (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.18, p = 0.005) than men. In addition, the overall survival was poorer in women (p <0.001), with 10-year survival rates of 66.5% for men and 60.0% for women. In conclusion, acute type A aortic dissection presents gender differences, with women facing higher perioperative and long-term mortality despite lower acute kidney injury and reoperation risks, suggesting a need for tailored management and prevention strategies.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.