Dermoscopy of Scabies: Utility of Polarised and Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Examination in Fair and Dark Skin

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Enzo Errichetti, Noemi Plozner, Nkechi A. Enechukwu, Yasmeen J. Bhat, Paweł Pietkiewicz, Natalia Salwowska, Iris Zalaudek, Giuseppe Stinco
{"title":"Dermoscopy of Scabies: Utility of Polarised and Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Examination in Fair and Dark Skin","authors":"Enzo Errichetti,&nbsp;Noemi Plozner,&nbsp;Nkechi A. Enechukwu,&nbsp;Yasmeen J. Bhat,&nbsp;Paweł Pietkiewicz,&nbsp;Natalia Salwowska,&nbsp;Iris Zalaudek,&nbsp;Giuseppe Stinco","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Ultraviolet-based dermoscopy may support the recognition of scabies, yet neither accuracy analyses nor data on skin of colour are available. The aim of this multicentric observational retrospective was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of polarised and ultraviolet-induced fluorescence (UVF) dermoscopic examination in both fair and dark skin, also assessing possible differences according to the skin tone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of scabies were eligible. All the images were randomly evaluated by two independent experienced investigators to identify scabietic findings reported in the literature. Interobserver agreement was evaluated for both polarised and UVF dermoscopic pictures through Cohen's kappa coefficient, while Fisher's exact test with <i>p</i>-value set at 0.05 was used for comparative analyses between the two settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 97 lesions from 43 patients (21 with fair skin and 22 with dark skin) were included. The comparative analysis highlighted a superiority of UVF dermoscopy to detect the burrow (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and scabietic eggs (<i>p</i> = 0.012) in skin of colour, while polarised dermoscopy was more accurate to show the mite in fair skin (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Additionally, a general higher accuracy of both settings in light phototypes was also found, with a higher prevalence (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) of typical scabietic findings (i.e., serpiginous white tract, ‘triangle’ sign and grey-brown outlines of the burrow for polarised dermoscopy and green dot for UVF dermoscopy) compared to dark skin. Kappa values were 0.87 and 0.83 for polarised and UVF-dermoscopy, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>UVF dermoscopy improves the recognition of scabies, though it should be considered complimentary to polarised light dermoscopic examination to increase diagnostic performance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"66 2","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajd.14406","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajd.14406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ultraviolet-based dermoscopy may support the recognition of scabies, yet neither accuracy analyses nor data on skin of colour are available. The aim of this multicentric observational retrospective was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of polarised and ultraviolet-induced fluorescence (UVF) dermoscopic examination in both fair and dark skin, also assessing possible differences according to the skin tone.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of scabies were eligible. All the images were randomly evaluated by two independent experienced investigators to identify scabietic findings reported in the literature. Interobserver agreement was evaluated for both polarised and UVF dermoscopic pictures through Cohen's kappa coefficient, while Fisher's exact test with p-value set at 0.05 was used for comparative analyses between the two settings.

Results

A total of 97 lesions from 43 patients (21 with fair skin and 22 with dark skin) were included. The comparative analysis highlighted a superiority of UVF dermoscopy to detect the burrow (p = 0.003) and scabietic eggs (p = 0.012) in skin of colour, while polarised dermoscopy was more accurate to show the mite in fair skin (p = 0.042). Additionally, a general higher accuracy of both settings in light phototypes was also found, with a higher prevalence (p < 0.05) of typical scabietic findings (i.e., serpiginous white tract, ‘triangle’ sign and grey-brown outlines of the burrow for polarised dermoscopy and green dot for UVF dermoscopy) compared to dark skin. Kappa values were 0.87 and 0.83 for polarised and UVF-dermoscopy, respectively.

Conclusions

UVF dermoscopy improves the recognition of scabies, though it should be considered complimentary to polarised light dermoscopic examination to increase diagnostic performance.

Abstract Image

疥疮的皮肤镜检查:在白皙和深色皮肤中偏振和紫外诱导荧光检查的应用。
基于紫外线的皮肤镜检查可能支持疥疮的识别,但既没有准确性分析,也没有皮肤颜色的数据。本多中心回顾性观察的目的是研究偏振和紫外线诱导荧光(UVF)皮肤镜检查在白皙和深色皮肤中的诊断准确性,并根据肤色评估可能的差异。方法:连续诊断为疥疮的患者入选。所有的图像随机评估由两个独立的有经验的调查员,以确定在文献报道疥疮的发现。通过Cohen的kappa系数来评估偏振和UVF皮肤镜图像的观察者间一致性,而Fisher的精确检验(p值设置为0.05)用于两种设置之间的比较分析。结果:共纳入43例患者的97个病变(白皙皮肤21例,深色皮肤22例)。对比分析显示,紫外紫外线皮肤镜在有色皮肤中检测出螨洞(p = 0.003)和疥疮卵(p = 0.012)的优势,而在白皙皮肤中,偏振皮肤镜更准确地显示出螨(p = 0.042)。此外,还发现两种情况在光照相类型中都具有较高的准确性,患病率较高(p)。结论:UVF皮肤镜检查提高了对疥疮的识别,尽管它应该被认为是偏振光皮肤镜检查的补充,以提高诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信