Combining the 15N Gas Flux Method and N2O Isotopocule Data for the Determination of Soil Microbial N2O Sources.

IF 1.8 3区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Gianni Micucci, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Fotis Sgouridis, Reinhard Well, Caroline Buchen-Tschiskale, Niall P McNamara, Stefan Krause, Iseult Lynch, Felicity Roos, Sami Ullah
{"title":"Combining the <sup>15</sup>N Gas Flux Method and N<sub>2</sub>O Isotopocule Data for the Determination of Soil Microbial N<sub>2</sub>O Sources.","authors":"Gianni Micucci, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Fotis Sgouridis, Reinhard Well, Caroline Buchen-Tschiskale, Niall P McNamara, Stefan Krause, Iseult Lynch, Felicity Roos, Sami Ullah","doi":"10.1002/rcm.9971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The analysis of natural abundance isotopes in biogenic N<sub>2</sub>O molecules provides valuable insights into the nature of their precursors and their role in biogeochemical cycles. However, current methodologies (for example, the isotopocule map approach) face limitations, as they only enable the estimation of combined contributions from multiple processes at once rather than discriminating individual sources. This study aimed to overcome this challenge by developing a novel methodology for the partitioning of N<sub>2</sub>O sources in soil, combining natural abundance isotopes and the use of a <sup>15</sup>N tracer (<sup>15</sup>N Gas Flux method) in parallel incubations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Laboratory incubations of an agricultural soil were conducted to optimize denitrification conditions through increased moisture and nitrate amendments, using nitrate that was either <sup>15</sup>N-labeled or unlabeled. A new linear system combined with Monte Carlo simulation was developed to determine N<sub>2</sub>O source contributions, and the subsequent results were compared with FRAME, a Bayesian statistical model for stable isotope analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our new methodology identified bacterial denitrification as the dominant process (87.6%), followed by fungal denitrification (9.4%), nitrification (1.5%), and nitrifier denitrification (1.6%). Comparisons with FRAME showed good agreement, although FRAME estimated slightly lower bacterial denitrification (80%) and higher nitrifier-denitrification (9%) contributions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This approach provides an improved framework for accurately partitioning N<sub>2</sub>O sources, enhancing understanding of nitrogen cycling in agroecosystems, and supporting broader environmental applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"39 6","pages":"e9971"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: The analysis of natural abundance isotopes in biogenic N2O molecules provides valuable insights into the nature of their precursors and their role in biogeochemical cycles. However, current methodologies (for example, the isotopocule map approach) face limitations, as they only enable the estimation of combined contributions from multiple processes at once rather than discriminating individual sources. This study aimed to overcome this challenge by developing a novel methodology for the partitioning of N2O sources in soil, combining natural abundance isotopes and the use of a 15N tracer (15N Gas Flux method) in parallel incubations.

Methods: Laboratory incubations of an agricultural soil were conducted to optimize denitrification conditions through increased moisture and nitrate amendments, using nitrate that was either 15N-labeled or unlabeled. A new linear system combined with Monte Carlo simulation was developed to determine N2O source contributions, and the subsequent results were compared with FRAME, a Bayesian statistical model for stable isotope analysis.

Results: Our new methodology identified bacterial denitrification as the dominant process (87.6%), followed by fungal denitrification (9.4%), nitrification (1.5%), and nitrifier denitrification (1.6%). Comparisons with FRAME showed good agreement, although FRAME estimated slightly lower bacterial denitrification (80%) and higher nitrifier-denitrification (9%) contributions.

Conclusions: This approach provides an improved framework for accurately partitioning N2O sources, enhancing understanding of nitrogen cycling in agroecosystems, and supporting broader environmental applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
219
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信