Key concepts and a world-wide look at plant recruitment networks.

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Julio M Alcántara, Miguel Verdú, José L Garrido, Alicia Montesinos-Navarro, Marcelo A Aizen, Mohamed Alifriqui, David Allen, Ali A Al-Namazi, Cristina Armas, Jesús M Bastida, Tono Bellido, Gustavo Brant Paterno, Herbert Briceño, Ricardo A Camargo de Oliveira, Josefina G Campoy, Ghassen Chaieb, Chengjin Chu, Elena Constantinou, Léo Delalandre, Milen Duarte, Michel Faife-Cabrera, Fatih Fazlioglu, Edwino S Fernando, Joel Flores, Hilda Flores-Olvera, Ecaterina Fodor, Gislene Ganade, Maria B Garcia, Patricio García-Fayos, Sabrina S Gavini, Marta Goberna, Lorena Gómez-Aparicio, Enrique González-Pendás, Ana González-Robles, Kahraman İpekdal, Zaal Kikvidze, Alicia Ledo, Sandra Lendínez, Hanlun Liu, Francisco Lloret, Ramiro P López, Álvaro López-García, Christopher J Lortie, Gianalberto Losapio, James A Lutz, František Máliš, Antonio J Manzaneda, Vinicius Marcilio-Silva, Richard Michalet, Rafael Molina-Venegas, José A Navarro-Cano, Vojtech Novotny, Jens M Olesen, Juan P Ortiz-Brunel, Mariona Pajares-Murgó, Antonio J Perea, Vidal Pérez-Hernández, María Ángeles Pérez-Navarro, Nuria Pistón, Iván Prieto, Jorge Prieto-Rubio, Francisco I Pugnaire, Nelson Ramírez, Rubén Retuerto, Pedro J Rey, Daniel A Rodriguez-Ginart, Ricardo Sánchez-Martín, Çağatay Tavşanoğlu, Giorgi Tedoradze, Amanda Tercero-Araque, Katja Tielbörger, Blaise Touzard, İrem Tüfekcioğlu, Sevda Turkis, Francisco M Usero, Nurbahar Usta-Baykal, Alfonso Valiente-Banuet, Alexa Vargas-Colin, Ioannis Vogiatzakis, Regino Zamora
{"title":"Key concepts and a world-wide look at plant recruitment networks.","authors":"Julio M Alcántara, Miguel Verdú, José L Garrido, Alicia Montesinos-Navarro, Marcelo A Aizen, Mohamed Alifriqui, David Allen, Ali A Al-Namazi, Cristina Armas, Jesús M Bastida, Tono Bellido, Gustavo Brant Paterno, Herbert Briceño, Ricardo A Camargo de Oliveira, Josefina G Campoy, Ghassen Chaieb, Chengjin Chu, Elena Constantinou, Léo Delalandre, Milen Duarte, Michel Faife-Cabrera, Fatih Fazlioglu, Edwino S Fernando, Joel Flores, Hilda Flores-Olvera, Ecaterina Fodor, Gislene Ganade, Maria B Garcia, Patricio García-Fayos, Sabrina S Gavini, Marta Goberna, Lorena Gómez-Aparicio, Enrique González-Pendás, Ana González-Robles, Kahraman İpekdal, Zaal Kikvidze, Alicia Ledo, Sandra Lendínez, Hanlun Liu, Francisco Lloret, Ramiro P López, Álvaro López-García, Christopher J Lortie, Gianalberto Losapio, James A Lutz, František Máliš, Antonio J Manzaneda, Vinicius Marcilio-Silva, Richard Michalet, Rafael Molina-Venegas, José A Navarro-Cano, Vojtech Novotny, Jens M Olesen, Juan P Ortiz-Brunel, Mariona Pajares-Murgó, Antonio J Perea, Vidal Pérez-Hernández, María Ángeles Pérez-Navarro, Nuria Pistón, Iván Prieto, Jorge Prieto-Rubio, Francisco I Pugnaire, Nelson Ramírez, Rubén Retuerto, Pedro J Rey, Daniel A Rodriguez-Ginart, Ricardo Sánchez-Martín, Çağatay Tavşanoğlu, Giorgi Tedoradze, Amanda Tercero-Araque, Katja Tielbörger, Blaise Touzard, İrem Tüfekcioğlu, Sevda Turkis, Francisco M Usero, Nurbahar Usta-Baykal, Alfonso Valiente-Banuet, Alexa Vargas-Colin, Ioannis Vogiatzakis, Regino Zamora","doi":"10.1111/brv.13177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-plant interactions are major determinants of the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. There is a long tradition in the study of these interactions, their mechanisms and their consequences using experimental, observational and theoretical approaches. Empirical studies overwhelmingly focus at the level of species pairs or small sets of species. Although empirical data on these interactions at the community level are scarce, such studies have gained pace in the last decade. Studying plant-plant interactions at the community level requires knowledge of which species interact with which others, so an ecological networks approach must be incorporated into the basic toolbox of plant community ecology. The concept of recruitment networks (RNs) provides an integrative framework and new insights for many topics in the field of plant community ecology. RNs synthesise the set of canopy-recruit interactions in a local plant assemblage. Canopy-recruit interactions describe which (\"canopy\") species allow the recruitment of other species in their vicinity and how. Here we critically review basic concepts of ecological network theory as they apply to RNs. We use RecruitNet, a recently published worldwide data set of canopy-recruit interactions, to describe RN patterns emerging at the interaction, species, and community levels, and relate them to different abiotic gradients. Our results show that RNs can be sampled with high accuracy. The studies included in RecruitNet show a very high mean network completeness (95%), indicating that undetected canopy-recruit pairs must be few and occur very infrequently. Across 351,064 canopy-recruit pairs analysed, the effect of the interaction on recruitment was neutral in an average of 69% of the interactions per community, but the remaining interactions were positive (i.e. facilitative) five times more often than negative (i.e. competitive), and positive interactions had twice the strength of negative ones. Moreover, the frequency and strength of facilitation increases along a climatic aridity gradient worldwide, so the demography of plant communities is increasingly strongly dependent on facilitation as aridity increases. At network level, species can be ascribed to four functional types depending on their position in the network: core, satellite, strict transients and disturbance-dependent transients. This functional structure can allow a rough estimation of which species are more likely to persist. In RecruitNet communities, this functional structure most often departs from random null model expectation and could allow on average the persistence of 77% of the species in a local community. The functional structure of RNs also varies along the aridity gradient, but differently in shrubland than in forest communities. This variation suggests an increase in the probability of species persistence with aridity in forests, while such probability remains roughly constant along the gradient in shrublands. The different functional structure of RNs between forests and shrublands could contribute to explaining their co-occurrence as alternative stable states of the vegetation under the same climatic conditions. This review is not exhaustive of all the topics that can be addressed using the framework of RNs, but instead aims to present some of the interesting insights that it can bring to the field of plant community ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-plant interactions are major determinants of the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. There is a long tradition in the study of these interactions, their mechanisms and their consequences using experimental, observational and theoretical approaches. Empirical studies overwhelmingly focus at the level of species pairs or small sets of species. Although empirical data on these interactions at the community level are scarce, such studies have gained pace in the last decade. Studying plant-plant interactions at the community level requires knowledge of which species interact with which others, so an ecological networks approach must be incorporated into the basic toolbox of plant community ecology. The concept of recruitment networks (RNs) provides an integrative framework and new insights for many topics in the field of plant community ecology. RNs synthesise the set of canopy-recruit interactions in a local plant assemblage. Canopy-recruit interactions describe which ("canopy") species allow the recruitment of other species in their vicinity and how. Here we critically review basic concepts of ecological network theory as they apply to RNs. We use RecruitNet, a recently published worldwide data set of canopy-recruit interactions, to describe RN patterns emerging at the interaction, species, and community levels, and relate them to different abiotic gradients. Our results show that RNs can be sampled with high accuracy. The studies included in RecruitNet show a very high mean network completeness (95%), indicating that undetected canopy-recruit pairs must be few and occur very infrequently. Across 351,064 canopy-recruit pairs analysed, the effect of the interaction on recruitment was neutral in an average of 69% of the interactions per community, but the remaining interactions were positive (i.e. facilitative) five times more often than negative (i.e. competitive), and positive interactions had twice the strength of negative ones. Moreover, the frequency and strength of facilitation increases along a climatic aridity gradient worldwide, so the demography of plant communities is increasingly strongly dependent on facilitation as aridity increases. At network level, species can be ascribed to four functional types depending on their position in the network: core, satellite, strict transients and disturbance-dependent transients. This functional structure can allow a rough estimation of which species are more likely to persist. In RecruitNet communities, this functional structure most often departs from random null model expectation and could allow on average the persistence of 77% of the species in a local community. The functional structure of RNs also varies along the aridity gradient, but differently in shrubland than in forest communities. This variation suggests an increase in the probability of species persistence with aridity in forests, while such probability remains roughly constant along the gradient in shrublands. The different functional structure of RNs between forests and shrublands could contribute to explaining their co-occurrence as alternative stable states of the vegetation under the same climatic conditions. This review is not exhaustive of all the topics that can be addressed using the framework of RNs, but instead aims to present some of the interesting insights that it can bring to the field of plant community ecology.

关键概念和全球范围内的植物招聘网络。
植物与植物之间的相互作用是陆地生态系统动态的主要决定因素。利用实验、观察和理论方法研究这些相互作用及其机制和后果有着悠久的传统。实证研究绝大多数集中在物种对或小物种集的水平上。虽然在社区一级关于这些相互作用的经验数据很少,但这类研究在过去十年中取得了进展。在群落水平上研究植物与植物之间的相互作用需要了解哪些物种与其他物种之间的相互作用,因此生态网络方法必须纳入植物群落生态学的基本工具箱。招募网络(RNs)的概念为植物群落生态学领域的许多问题提供了一个综合的框架和新的见解。RNs在局部植物组合中合成一组冠层-招募相互作用。冠层-招募相互作用描述了哪些(“冠层”)物种允许其附近的其他物种招募以及如何招募。在这里,我们批判性地回顾了生态网络理论的基本概念,因为它们适用于RNs。我们使用RecruitNet,一个最近发布的全球树冠-植物相互作用的数据集,来描述在相互作用、物种和群落水平上出现的RN模式,并将它们与不同的非生物梯度联系起来。我们的研究结果表明,RNs可以以较高的精度进行采样。包括在RecruitNet上的研究显示了非常高的平均网络完整性(95%),这表明未被发现的树冠-招募对一定很少,而且很少发生。在分析的351064对树冠-招募对中,在每个社区平均69%的互动中,互动对招聘的影响是中性的,但其余的互动是积极的(即促进)比消极的(即竞争)多五倍,积极互动的强度是消极互动的两倍。此外,促进作用的频率和强度在全球范围内沿气候干旱梯度增加,因此随着干旱的增加,植物群落的人口统计学越来越强烈地依赖于促进作用。在网络水平上,物种根据其在网络中的位置可分为四种功能类型:核心、卫星、严格瞬态和扰动依赖瞬态。这种功能结构可以粗略估计哪些物种更有可能持续下去。在RecruitNet社区中,这种功能结构通常偏离随机零模型期望,并且可以允许平均77%的物种在当地社区中持续存在。RNs的功能结构也随干旱梯度而变化,但灌木群落与森林群落的RNs功能结构不同。这种变化表明,在森林中,物种在干旱条件下持续存在的可能性增加,而在灌丛中,这种可能性沿梯度大致保持不变。森林和灌丛RNs的不同功能结构可能有助于解释它们在相同气候条件下作为植被交替稳定状态共存的原因。这篇综述并没有详尽地介绍使用RNs框架可以解决的所有主题,而是旨在提出一些有趣的见解,它可以给植物群落生态学领域带来一些启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信