Multi-Armed Bandits With Costly Probes

IF 2.2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Eray Can Elumar;Cem Tekin;Osman Yağan
{"title":"Multi-Armed Bandits With Costly Probes","authors":"Eray Can Elumar;Cem Tekin;Osman Yağan","doi":"10.1109/TIT.2024.3506866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-armed bandits is a sequential decision-making problem where an agent must choose between multiple actions to maximize its cumulative reward over time, while facing uncertainty about the rewards associated with each action. The challenge lies in balancing the exploration of potentially higher-rewarding actions with the exploitation of known high-reward actions. We consider a multi-armed bandit problem with probes, where before pulling an arm, the decision-maker is allowed to probe one of the K arms for a cost \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$c\\geq 0$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n to observe its reward. We introduce a new regret definition that is based on the expected reward of the optimal action. We develop UCBP, a novel algorithm that utilizes this strategy to achieve a gap-independent regret upper bound that scales with the number of rounds T as \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$ O(\\sqrt {KT\\log T})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, and an order optimal gap-dependent upper bound of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$ O(K\\log T)$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. As a baseline, we introduce UCB-naive-probe, a naive UCB-based approach which has a gap-independent regret upper bound of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$O(K\\sqrt {T\\log T})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, and gap-dependent regret bound of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$O(K^{2}\\log T)$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n; and TSP, the Thompson sampling version of UCBP. In empirical simulations, UCBP outperforms UCB-naive-probe, and performs similarly to TSP, verifying the utility of UCBP and TSP algorithms in practical settings.","PeriodicalId":13494,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","volume":"71 1","pages":"618-643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10767721/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-armed bandits is a sequential decision-making problem where an agent must choose between multiple actions to maximize its cumulative reward over time, while facing uncertainty about the rewards associated with each action. The challenge lies in balancing the exploration of potentially higher-rewarding actions with the exploitation of known high-reward actions. We consider a multi-armed bandit problem with probes, where before pulling an arm, the decision-maker is allowed to probe one of the K arms for a cost $c\geq 0$ to observe its reward. We introduce a new regret definition that is based on the expected reward of the optimal action. We develop UCBP, a novel algorithm that utilizes this strategy to achieve a gap-independent regret upper bound that scales with the number of rounds T as $ O(\sqrt {KT\log T})$ , and an order optimal gap-dependent upper bound of $ O(K\log T)$ . As a baseline, we introduce UCB-naive-probe, a naive UCB-based approach which has a gap-independent regret upper bound of $O(K\sqrt {T\log T})$ , and gap-dependent regret bound of $O(K^{2}\log T)$ ; and TSP, the Thompson sampling version of UCBP. In empirical simulations, UCBP outperforms UCB-naive-probe, and performs similarly to TSP, verifying the utility of UCBP and TSP algorithms in practical settings.
携带昂贵探测器的多武装土匪
多武装盗匪是一个顺序决策问题,其中代理必须在多个行动之间做出选择,以最大化其累积奖励,同时面临与每个行动相关的奖励的不确定性。挑战在于如何在探索潜在的高回报行为和利用已知的高回报行为之间取得平衡。我们考虑一个带有探针的多臂强盗问题,在拉动手臂之前,决策者被允许以$c\geq 0$的代价探测K条手臂中的一条,以观察其回报。我们引入了一个基于最优行为预期回报的后悔定义。我们开发了一种新的UCBP算法,该算法利用该策略实现了与间隙无关的遗憾上界,该上界随轮数T缩放为$ O(\sqrt {KT\log T})$,以及与间隙相关的阶最优上界$ O(K\log T)$。作为基线,我们引入了UCB-naive-probe,这是一种基于朴素ucb的方法,其间隙无关的后悔上界为$O(K\sqrt {T\log T})$,间隙依赖的后悔界为$O(K^{2}\log T)$;和TSP,汤普森采样版的UCBP。在经验模拟中,UCBP优于UCB-naive-probe,并且与TSP相似,验证了UCBP和TSP算法在实际设置中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
514
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Information Theory is a journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers concerned with the transmission, processing, and utilization of information. The boundaries of acceptable subject matter are intentionally not sharply delimited. Rather, it is hoped that as the focus of research activity changes, a flexible policy will permit this Transactions to follow suit. Current appropriate topics are best reflected by recent Tables of Contents; they are summarized in the titles of editorial areas that appear on the inside front cover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信