Drought analysis in the Seyhan River Basin based on standardized drought indices using a new approach considering seasonality

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tolga Barış Terzi, Bihrat Önöz
{"title":"Drought analysis in the Seyhan River Basin based on standardized drought indices using a new approach considering seasonality","authors":"Tolga Barış Terzi,&nbsp;Bihrat Önöz","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12039-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drought is a significant natural disaster with adverse effects on both social and ecological systems. Unlike other natural disasters, drought develops slowly and gradually, complicating its early detection and often resulting in severe impacts on affected regions. Consequently, accurate and dependable drought monitoring is essential for devising effective mitigation strategies. Standardized drought indices are vital tools in drought monitoring, providing a means to quantify and characterize drought events. Most standardized drought indices utilize the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) method, which is valued for its simplicity and flexibility. However, this study contends that the SPI method lacks several critical elements, particularly in practice, such as determining the most suitable probability distribution for hydrometeorological variables. Therefore, this study proposes a novel methodology for calculating standardized drought indices and assesses its performance against conventional and nonparametric standardized indices, employing various methods capable of capturing complex dependencies. The novel methodology involves identifying the best-fit probability distributions for each data group through various goodness-of-fit tests. This approach ensures that each group is modeled optimally, considering the seasonal variations inherent to each group. The Seyhan River Basin has been chosen as a case study for the proposed methodology. The drought characteristics of the basin are analyzed using indices derived from the new methodology, the conventional SPI method, and the nonparametric method. Additionally, trend analyses were performed on the calculated indices to identify any directional changes in drought patterns within the Seyhan River Basin. The performance of the proposed methodology was evaluated by analyzing its relationship with nonparametric standardized indices and comparing it to the relationship between conventional standardized indices and nonparametric standardized indices. The results show that the newly proposed methodology outperforms the conventional SPI method across various dependence measures, suggesting it captures the underlying data structure more effectively than the SPI method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12039-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drought is a significant natural disaster with adverse effects on both social and ecological systems. Unlike other natural disasters, drought develops slowly and gradually, complicating its early detection and often resulting in severe impacts on affected regions. Consequently, accurate and dependable drought monitoring is essential for devising effective mitigation strategies. Standardized drought indices are vital tools in drought monitoring, providing a means to quantify and characterize drought events. Most standardized drought indices utilize the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) method, which is valued for its simplicity and flexibility. However, this study contends that the SPI method lacks several critical elements, particularly in practice, such as determining the most suitable probability distribution for hydrometeorological variables. Therefore, this study proposes a novel methodology for calculating standardized drought indices and assesses its performance against conventional and nonparametric standardized indices, employing various methods capable of capturing complex dependencies. The novel methodology involves identifying the best-fit probability distributions for each data group through various goodness-of-fit tests. This approach ensures that each group is modeled optimally, considering the seasonal variations inherent to each group. The Seyhan River Basin has been chosen as a case study for the proposed methodology. The drought characteristics of the basin are analyzed using indices derived from the new methodology, the conventional SPI method, and the nonparametric method. Additionally, trend analyses were performed on the calculated indices to identify any directional changes in drought patterns within the Seyhan River Basin. The performance of the proposed methodology was evaluated by analyzing its relationship with nonparametric standardized indices and comparing it to the relationship between conventional standardized indices and nonparametric standardized indices. The results show that the newly proposed methodology outperforms the conventional SPI method across various dependence measures, suggesting it captures the underlying data structure more effectively than the SPI method.

Abstract Image

基于标准化干旱指数的塞汉江流域干旱分析
干旱是一种重大的自然灾害,对社会和生态系统都有不利影响。与其他自然灾害不同,干旱的发展缓慢而渐进,使早期发现变得复杂,往往对受影响地区造成严重影响。因此,准确和可靠的干旱监测对于制定有效的缓解战略至关重要。标准化干旱指数是干旱监测的重要工具,提供了一种量化和描述干旱事件的手段。标准化干旱指数大多采用标准化降水指数(SPI)方法,该方法具有简单、灵活等优点。然而,本研究认为,SPI方法缺乏几个关键要素,特别是在实践中,例如确定最合适的水文气象变量的概率分布。因此,本研究提出了一种计算标准化干旱指数的新方法,并采用能够捕获复杂依赖关系的各种方法,对其与传统和非参数标准化指数的性能进行评估。新方法包括通过各种拟合优度检验确定每个数据组的最佳拟合概率分布。这种方法确保每个组的模型都是最优的,考虑到每个组固有的季节变化。塞汉河流域已被选为拟议方法的案例研究。采用新方法、传统SPI方法和非参数方法对流域干旱特征进行了分析。此外,对计算的指数进行趋势分析,以确定塞汉江流域干旱格局的方向性变化。通过分析该方法与非参数标准化指标之间的关系,并将其与常规标准化指标与非参数标准化指标之间的关系进行比较,评价了该方法的性能。结果表明,新提出的方法在各种依赖度量上优于传统的SPI方法,表明它比SPI方法更有效地捕获底层数据结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信