Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Maria V. Yurovskaya, Mikhail V. Shokurov, Vladislav S. Barabanov, Yury Yu. Yurovsky, Vladimir N. Kudryavtsev, Oleg T. Kamenev
{"title":"Wind and Wave Hindcast and Observations During the Black Sea Storms in November 2023","authors":"Maria V. Yurovskaya,&nbsp;Mikhail V. Shokurov,&nbsp;Vladislav S. Barabanov,&nbsp;Yury Yu. Yurovsky,&nbsp;Vladimir N. Kudryavtsev,&nbsp;Oleg T. Kamenev","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03592-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers the continuous period from the 1st to the 30th of November including two strong storms with wave heights up to 9–10 m. Wave simulations are performed using WAM and the 2D parametric model for surface wave development suggested in Kudryavtsev et al. (2021a). The wave models are forced by hourly wind fields from four datasets: ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5), ECMWF Level-4 bias-corrected operational model, NCEP (CFSv2), and the regional WRF-ARW model with 6-hour NCEP/NCAR atmospheric forecast as input. The high-resolution Level-4 wave analysis for the Black Sea produced by CMEMS (also using WAM Cycle 6) is also considered. Simulation results are validated against along-track altimeter measurements of significant wave height, CFOSAT SWIM information on dominant wavelength and wave direction, and in-situ data from an oceanographic platform near Crimea. All models demonstrate their overall good performance, though third-generation wave spectral models give an expectedly higher correlation between simulations and observed data, while the parametric model is less accurate. Some recommendations to combine wind and wave models for the most accurate predictions are further given. As known, the wind speed fields produced by ECMWF are underestimated at winds higher than 15–20 m/s. While the wind correction is crucial when using the parametric model, WAM better reproduces the observed extreme waves without it. As also obtained, WAM simulations forced by NCEP and WRF winds lead to an overestimation of the largest storm waves. Increased resolution of the wind fields does not lead to significant improvement in the quality of wave predictions, which can be explained by the wind accumulation effect during wave development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"181 11","pages":"3149 - 3171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03592-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Black Sea coasts from the northwest of Turkey through Crimea to Georgia were strongly affected by severe storms in Autumn, 2023. The aim of the work is to compare the performance of different wave model approaches and wind datasets in extreme weather conditions in the Black Sea. The study covers the continuous period from the 1st to the 30th of November including two strong storms with wave heights up to 9–10 m. Wave simulations are performed using WAM and the 2D parametric model for surface wave development suggested in Kudryavtsev et al. (2021a). The wave models are forced by hourly wind fields from four datasets: ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5), ECMWF Level-4 bias-corrected operational model, NCEP (CFSv2), and the regional WRF-ARW model with 6-hour NCEP/NCAR atmospheric forecast as input. The high-resolution Level-4 wave analysis for the Black Sea produced by CMEMS (also using WAM Cycle 6) is also considered. Simulation results are validated against along-track altimeter measurements of significant wave height, CFOSAT SWIM information on dominant wavelength and wave direction, and in-situ data from an oceanographic platform near Crimea. All models demonstrate their overall good performance, though third-generation wave spectral models give an expectedly higher correlation between simulations and observed data, while the parametric model is less accurate. Some recommendations to combine wind and wave models for the most accurate predictions are further given. As known, the wind speed fields produced by ECMWF are underestimated at winds higher than 15–20 m/s. While the wind correction is crucial when using the parametric model, WAM better reproduces the observed extreme waves without it. As also obtained, WAM simulations forced by NCEP and WRF winds lead to an overestimation of the largest storm waves. Increased resolution of the wind fields does not lead to significant improvement in the quality of wave predictions, which can be explained by the wind accumulation effect during wave development.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信