{"title":"Quantitative assessment of environmental indicators influencing enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) technique in soil: LCA based approach","authors":"Sonia Raj Gurung, Pranamee Baruah, Susmita Sharma","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11998-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) is an emerging sustainable technology in the field of geotechnical engineering. It involves the application of urease, a plant-based urease enzyme which mediates the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) via hydrolysis of urea. This results in biocementation and subsequent improvement of the strength of the soil. In purview of this developing bio-stabilization technique, Life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used as a promising tool for incorporating sustainability metrics to evaluate the environmental impacts related to EICP technique and assist in policy and decision making. In this present study, an attributional LCA is conducted to investigate and quantify the various environmental impacts associated with EICP concentrations as proposed by various researchers. The environmental impact indicators taken into consideration are global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), energy use potential (EUP) and freshwater ecotoxicity potential (FWP). The results revealed that chemical constituents of EICP i.e., urea (51.25–74.53%) and non-fat milk powder (52.82–87.11%) are the dominant contributors to GWP (max: 2146.95 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq). Urea also contributes to EUP in the range between 69.58 and 92.6% (max: 14,279 MJ). However, NH<sub>4</sub>Cl, the by-product (NH<sub>4</sub>Cl) of EICP process, a water pollutant, is the major contributor to EP (max: 326.44 kg N eq) and FWP (max: 289.25 kg 1,4-DCB eq). This indicates that more focus should be bestowed on EP and FWP to better characterize and quantify the associated ecosystem response due to over-utilization of the chemicals, for any EICP stabilization technique. Thus, this analysis considers the aspect of sustainability inground modification technique, aiding the advancement of EICP research.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11998-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) is an emerging sustainable technology in the field of geotechnical engineering. It involves the application of urease, a plant-based urease enzyme which mediates the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) via hydrolysis of urea. This results in biocementation and subsequent improvement of the strength of the soil. In purview of this developing bio-stabilization technique, Life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used as a promising tool for incorporating sustainability metrics to evaluate the environmental impacts related to EICP technique and assist in policy and decision making. In this present study, an attributional LCA is conducted to investigate and quantify the various environmental impacts associated with EICP concentrations as proposed by various researchers. The environmental impact indicators taken into consideration are global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), energy use potential (EUP) and freshwater ecotoxicity potential (FWP). The results revealed that chemical constituents of EICP i.e., urea (51.25–74.53%) and non-fat milk powder (52.82–87.11%) are the dominant contributors to GWP (max: 2146.95 kg CO2 eq). Urea also contributes to EUP in the range between 69.58 and 92.6% (max: 14,279 MJ). However, NH4Cl, the by-product (NH4Cl) of EICP process, a water pollutant, is the major contributor to EP (max: 326.44 kg N eq) and FWP (max: 289.25 kg 1,4-DCB eq). This indicates that more focus should be bestowed on EP and FWP to better characterize and quantify the associated ecosystem response due to over-utilization of the chemicals, for any EICP stabilization technique. Thus, this analysis considers the aspect of sustainability inground modification technique, aiding the advancement of EICP research.
酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀(EICP)是岩土工程领域中一项新兴的可持续发展技术。它涉及到脲酶的应用,脲酶是一种植物基脲酶,通过尿素水解介导碳酸钙(CaCO3)的沉淀。这导致了生物胶结和随后的土壤强度的改善。在这种发展中的生物稳定技术范围内,生命周期评估(LCA)可以作为一种有前途的工具,用于纳入可持续性指标来评估与EICP技术相关的环境影响,并协助政策和决策。在本研究中,我们采用归因LCA来调查和量化不同研究者提出的与EICP浓度相关的各种环境影响。考虑的环境影响指标有全球变暖潜势(GWP)、富营养化潜势(EP)、能源利用潜势(EUP)和淡水生态毒性潜势(FWP)。结果表明,尿素(51.25 ~ 74.53%)和脱脂奶粉(52.82 ~ 87.11%)是影响全球变暖潜能值的主要化学成分(最大为2146.95 kg CO2 eq)。尿素对EUP的贡献也在69.58 - 92.6%之间(最大:14,279 MJ)。而EICP过程的副产物NH4Cl (NH4Cl)是水污染物,是EP(最大:326.44 kg N eq)和FWP(最大:289.25 kg 1,4- dcb eq)的主要贡献者。这表明,对于任何EICP稳定技术,都应该更多地关注EP和FWP,以更好地表征和量化由于化学品过度利用而导致的相关生态系统响应。因此,本分析考虑了可持续性方面的地下改造技术,有助于推进EICP研究。图形抽象
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.