Energy organization sentiment and oil return forecast

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Minhyuk Jeong, Kwangwon Ahn
{"title":"Energy organization sentiment and oil return forecast","authors":"Minhyuk Jeong, Kwangwon Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the role of energy organization sentiments for oil return forecasts. First, we construct organization sentiment indexes using ChatGPT, a large language model, which enables us to extract sentimental information from the oil market reports issued by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). We found that organization sentiment indexes have a significantly negative impact on future oil price changes, and the information in OPEC's sentiment dominates that in the IEA's sentiment. The significance survives in models controlled by well-known oil pricing factors, e.g., oil market fundamentals, financial factors, and consumer and investor sentiments. The organization sentiment indexes Granger cause changes in oil production decisions, where oil production is identified as the channel through which the organization sentiment indexes influence future crude oil returns. We also found that the impact of organization sentiments is time-varying depending on investor sentiments and the market returns but mostly remains significant for both the in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasts. Oil market participants, e.g., oil consumers, producers, and investors, can refer to the proposed organization sentiment indexes while trading crude oil to improve their utility. The inclusion of OPEC sentiment yields 2.40 % of certainty equivalent return gain, which is increased to 2.56 % with the addition of IEA sentiment. The findings of this study imply that the IEA should review its role and influence to maintain energy security effectively, and OPEC should track the profitability of its production adjustments.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the role of energy organization sentiments for oil return forecasts. First, we construct organization sentiment indexes using ChatGPT, a large language model, which enables us to extract sentimental information from the oil market reports issued by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). We found that organization sentiment indexes have a significantly negative impact on future oil price changes, and the information in OPEC's sentiment dominates that in the IEA's sentiment. The significance survives in models controlled by well-known oil pricing factors, e.g., oil market fundamentals, financial factors, and consumer and investor sentiments. The organization sentiment indexes Granger cause changes in oil production decisions, where oil production is identified as the channel through which the organization sentiment indexes influence future crude oil returns. We also found that the impact of organization sentiments is time-varying depending on investor sentiments and the market returns but mostly remains significant for both the in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasts. Oil market participants, e.g., oil consumers, producers, and investors, can refer to the proposed organization sentiment indexes while trading crude oil to improve their utility. The inclusion of OPEC sentiment yields 2.40 % of certainty equivalent return gain, which is increased to 2.56 % with the addition of IEA sentiment. The findings of this study imply that the IEA should review its role and influence to maintain energy security effectively, and OPEC should track the profitability of its production adjustments.
能源组织情绪和石油回归预测
本研究探讨能源组织情绪对石油收益预测的作用。首先,我们使用ChatGPT(一个大型语言模型)构建组织情绪指数,该模型使我们能够从国际能源署(IEA)和石油输出国组织(OPEC)发布的石油市场报告中提取情绪信息。我们发现,组织情绪指数对未来油价变化有显著的负向影响,且OPEC情绪信息主导IEA情绪信息。在由众所周知的石油定价因素控制的模型中,例如石油市场基本面、金融因素以及消费者和投资者情绪,这种重要性仍然存在。组织情绪指数格兰杰导致石油生产决策的变化,其中石油生产被确定为组织情绪指数影响未来原油收益的渠道。我们还发现,组织情绪的影响是随时间变化的,取决于投资者情绪和市场回报,但大多数情况下,样本内拟合和样本外预测仍然显著。石油市场参与者,如石油消费者、生产商和投资者,在进行原油交易时可以参考提出的组织情绪指数,以提高其效用。将OPEC的观点考虑在内,可获得2.40%的确定性等效收益,而将IEA的观点考虑在内,则可获得2.56%的确定性等效收益。研究结果表明,国际能源署应重新审视其作用和影响力,以有效地维护能源安全,欧佩克应跟踪其生产调整的盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信