{"title":"Winners and losers of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. An intra-EU issue?","authors":"Marco Amendola","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper develops a Multi-Regional Input–Output analytical framework to study the EU’s recently adopted carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). This policy introduces carbon tariffs to replace free allowances in several Emission Trading System (ETS) industries to reinforce and extend the EU carbon price signal while mitigating the risk of carbon leakage. Yet, the policy has prompted immediate international equity concerns, particularly regarding its potential burden-shifting effect, especially on low-income countries. In this context, the analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the distributional impacts of the EU CBAM, shedding light on the countries and industries most affected by the policy. Contrary to the apprehensions, the findings indicate limited evidence of burden shifting, with such a phenomenon being confined to a few specific geographical areas and industries. Instead, the results unveil more pronounced redistributive impacts within the EU, with certain Eastern EU countries facing particular losses from replacing free allowances with CBAM. Adverse competitiveness effects and carbon leakage in various downstream industries are also identified.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper develops a Multi-Regional Input–Output analytical framework to study the EU’s recently adopted carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). This policy introduces carbon tariffs to replace free allowances in several Emission Trading System (ETS) industries to reinforce and extend the EU carbon price signal while mitigating the risk of carbon leakage. Yet, the policy has prompted immediate international equity concerns, particularly regarding its potential burden-shifting effect, especially on low-income countries. In this context, the analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the distributional impacts of the EU CBAM, shedding light on the countries and industries most affected by the policy. Contrary to the apprehensions, the findings indicate limited evidence of burden shifting, with such a phenomenon being confined to a few specific geographical areas and industries. Instead, the results unveil more pronounced redistributive impacts within the EU, with certain Eastern EU countries facing particular losses from replacing free allowances with CBAM. Adverse competitiveness effects and carbon leakage in various downstream industries are also identified.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.