The Application of Digital PCR as a Reference Measurement Procedure to Support the Accuracy of Quality Assurance for Infectious Disease Molecular Diagnostic Testing.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Samreen Falak,Denise M O'Sullivan,Megan H Cleveland,Simon Cowen,Eloise J Busby,Alison S Devonshire,Esmeralda Valiente,Gerwyn M Jones,Martin Kammel,Mojca Milavec,Laura Vierbaum,Ingo Schellenberg,Heinz Zeichhardt,Andreas Kummrow,Peter M Vallone,Rainer Macdonald,Jim F Huggett
{"title":"The Application of Digital PCR as a Reference Measurement Procedure to Support the Accuracy of Quality Assurance for Infectious Disease Molecular Diagnostic Testing.","authors":"Samreen Falak,Denise M O'Sullivan,Megan H Cleveland,Simon Cowen,Eloise J Busby,Alison S Devonshire,Esmeralda Valiente,Gerwyn M Jones,Martin Kammel,Mojca Milavec,Laura Vierbaum,Ingo Schellenberg,Heinz Zeichhardt,Andreas Kummrow,Peter M Vallone,Rainer Macdonald,Jim F Huggett","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nNucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) assist in the diagnosis of numerous infectious diseases. They are typically sensitive and specific and can be quickly developed and adapted. Far more challenging is the development of standards to ensure NAATs are performing within specification; reference materials take time to develop and suitable reference measurement procedures (RMPs) have not been available. This study investigated digital PCR (dPCR) RMP delivery of traceability for NAAT external quality assessment (EQA).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThree National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) applied reverse transcription (RT)-dPCR as a candidate RMP to estimate the RNA quantity in 32 independent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 materials. The results were combined to value assign the respective materials: 21 materials were used in 6 rounds of EQA over 17 months for 61 laboratories for COVID-19 testing results compared with reference values.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe agreement between the 3 NMIs showed <2-fold difference between laboratories. EQA laboratory reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) values estimation of viral RNA quantity showed good median agreement with RT-dPCR reference value; however, RT-qPCR differences were generally between 10- and 50-fold between laboratories.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis work demonstrates how RT-dPCR can provide reference values for whole virus materials for NAAT quality assurance. RT-dPCR values guided EQA control material selection and provided EQA participants with traceability to RNA copy number delivered through the RMP. This approach can be used to support routine reference material use as well as to standardize quality assurance for NAATs where established reference materials are not available, such as in disease outbreaks.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) assist in the diagnosis of numerous infectious diseases. They are typically sensitive and specific and can be quickly developed and adapted. Far more challenging is the development of standards to ensure NAATs are performing within specification; reference materials take time to develop and suitable reference measurement procedures (RMPs) have not been available. This study investigated digital PCR (dPCR) RMP delivery of traceability for NAAT external quality assessment (EQA). METHODS Three National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) applied reverse transcription (RT)-dPCR as a candidate RMP to estimate the RNA quantity in 32 independent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 materials. The results were combined to value assign the respective materials: 21 materials were used in 6 rounds of EQA over 17 months for 61 laboratories for COVID-19 testing results compared with reference values. RESULTS The agreement between the 3 NMIs showed <2-fold difference between laboratories. EQA laboratory reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) values estimation of viral RNA quantity showed good median agreement with RT-dPCR reference value; however, RT-qPCR differences were generally between 10- and 50-fold between laboratories. CONCLUSION This work demonstrates how RT-dPCR can provide reference values for whole virus materials for NAAT quality assurance. RT-dPCR values guided EQA control material selection and provided EQA participants with traceability to RNA copy number delivered through the RMP. This approach can be used to support routine reference material use as well as to standardize quality assurance for NAATs where established reference materials are not available, such as in disease outbreaks.
应用数字PCR作为参考测量程序支持传染病分子诊断检测质量保证的准确性。
背景核酸扩增试验(NAATs)有助于许多传染病的诊断。它们通常是敏感和特异性的,可以迅速发展和适应。更具挑战性的是制定标准,以确保naat在规范范围内执行;标准物质的开发需要时间,而且还没有合适的参考测量程序。本研究探讨了数字PCR (dPCR) RMP传递对NAAT外部质量评估(EQA)的可追溯性。方法3个国家计量研究所(NMIs)采用逆转录(RT)-dPCR作为候选RMP方法,对32份独立的sars冠状病毒2型材料的RNA数量进行估计。将结果结合起来对各自的材料进行数值分配:61个实验室在17个月的6轮EQA中使用了21种材料,将COVID-19检测结果与参考值进行比较。结果3种nmi的一致性在实验室间差异<2倍。EQA实验室逆转录定量PCR (RT-qPCR)病毒RNA量估计值与RT-dPCR参考值吻合中值较好;然而,实验室之间的RT-qPCR差异通常在10到50倍之间。结论RT-dPCR可为NAAT全病毒材料的质量保证提供参考价值。RT-dPCR值指导EQA对照材料的选择,并为EQA参与者提供通过RMP传递的RNA拷贝数的可追溯性。这种方法可用于支持常规参考物质的使用,以及在无法获得既定参考物质的情况下(例如在疾病暴发时)标准化NAATs的质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信