Public space at stake: competing forms of territorialisation and the construction of a democratic public space in the first years of the Italian Republic

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Modern Italy Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1017/mit.2024.54
Virgile Cirefice
{"title":"Public space at stake: competing forms of territorialisation and the construction of a democratic public space in the first years of the Italian Republic","authors":"Virgile Cirefice","doi":"10.1017/mit.2024.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The end of the civil war, the fall of the Italian Social Republic, the allied occupation and the gradual transition to the new Italian Republic not only set Italy on the path to democracy, but also gradually gave Italians access to a new public space. This article proposes to revisit the classic question of the legacy of Fascism by looking at the question of space and the difficult construction of a genuine democratic space. During the <jats:italic>ventennio</jats:italic>, opponents were largely denied access to common spaces, both symbolically and physically. The article raises the question of violence and the exclusive appropriation of space, showing that the representations and practices inherited from Fascism did not disappear overnight. But these practices of space were not always violent: by looking at aspects that are often neglected (graffiti, manifestos, noises and singing), the aim is to show that the transition took time and was sometimes complicated, despite the political leaders of the Italian Republic claiming to have opened up a completely new era.","PeriodicalId":18688,"journal":{"name":"Modern Italy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Italy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mit.2024.54","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The end of the civil war, the fall of the Italian Social Republic, the allied occupation and the gradual transition to the new Italian Republic not only set Italy on the path to democracy, but also gradually gave Italians access to a new public space. This article proposes to revisit the classic question of the legacy of Fascism by looking at the question of space and the difficult construction of a genuine democratic space. During the ventennio, opponents were largely denied access to common spaces, both symbolically and physically. The article raises the question of violence and the exclusive appropriation of space, showing that the representations and practices inherited from Fascism did not disappear overnight. But these practices of space were not always violent: by looking at aspects that are often neglected (graffiti, manifestos, noises and singing), the aim is to show that the transition took time and was sometimes complicated, despite the political leaders of the Italian Republic claiming to have opened up a completely new era.
利害攸关的公共空间:在意大利共和国的最初几年里,领土化的竞争形式和民主公共空间的建设
内战的结束、意大利社会共和国的垮台、盟军的占领以及向新的意大利共和国的逐步过渡,不仅使意大利走上了民主的道路,而且逐渐使意大利人获得了新的公共空间。本文拟从空间问题和构建真正民主空间的困难出发,重新审视法西斯主义遗留问题这一经典问题。在ventennio期间,反对者在很大程度上被拒绝进入公共空间,无论是象征性的还是实际的。文章提出了暴力和空间独占的问题,表明继承自法西斯主义的表现和实践并不是一夜之间消失的。但这些空间的实践并不总是暴力的:通过观察经常被忽视的方面(涂鸦、宣言、噪音和唱歌),目的是表明过渡需要时间,有时是复杂的,尽管意大利共和国的政治领导人声称已经开启了一个全新的时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Italy
Modern Italy Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信