Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant: A Retrospective Analysis of Bone Remodeling Over Five Years of Follow-Up.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-12-22 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.76228
Cosmin I Faur, Adrian Herman, Ionut Leahu, Sergiu Megiesan, Ionut Caluian
{"title":"Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant: A Retrospective Analysis of Bone Remodeling Over Five Years of Follow-Up.","authors":"Cosmin I Faur, Adrian Herman, Ionut Leahu, Sergiu Megiesan, Ionut Caluian","doi":"10.7759/cureus.76228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bone remodeling around implants in implant-supported rehabilitation is a continuous debate with no consensus in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the implant- and patient-specific factors contributing to marginal bone loss near the implant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included patients who had implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation using one implant system, between 2014 and 2018, who had full follow-up documentation and orthopantomography over five years, and who had no unwell-controlled systemic pathologies that may influence bone metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients who received 500 implants met the inclusion criteria. We observed approximately 1 mm of bone resorption at the five-year follow-up, with the first 0.78 mm of them being documented at the three-year follow-up. Adults younger than 60 years old had an increase in bone resorption by approximately 30%. No difference was seen between men and women. However, a slight increase in bone resorption at five years was seen in female patients older than 50 years old than in ones younger than 50 years (by 30%). The narrowest diameter (3.5 mm; p = 0.001) and anterior mandible (p = 0.008) had the highest bone resorptions. Contrarily, with an insertion depth of approximately 1 mm (p = 0.004), the splinted implant prosthesis (p = 0.21) and zirconia material of the prosthesis (p = 0.57) had the lowest bone remodeling. Moreover, patients younger than 60 years and female patients above 50 years had an increased bone resorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bone remodeling is a multifactorial process. The treatment planning has to take into consideration both implant- and patient-specific factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 12","pages":"e76228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bone remodeling around implants in implant-supported rehabilitation is a continuous debate with no consensus in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the implant- and patient-specific factors contributing to marginal bone loss near the implant.

Materials and methods: We included patients who had implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation using one implant system, between 2014 and 2018, who had full follow-up documentation and orthopantomography over five years, and who had no unwell-controlled systemic pathologies that may influence bone metabolism.

Results: Eighty-one patients who received 500 implants met the inclusion criteria. We observed approximately 1 mm of bone resorption at the five-year follow-up, with the first 0.78 mm of them being documented at the three-year follow-up. Adults younger than 60 years old had an increase in bone resorption by approximately 30%. No difference was seen between men and women. However, a slight increase in bone resorption at five years was seen in female patients older than 50 years old than in ones younger than 50 years (by 30%). The narrowest diameter (3.5 mm; p = 0.001) and anterior mandible (p = 0.008) had the highest bone resorptions. Contrarily, with an insertion depth of approximately 1 mm (p = 0.004), the splinted implant prosthesis (p = 0.21) and zirconia material of the prosthesis (p = 0.57) had the lowest bone remodeling. Moreover, patients younger than 60 years and female patients above 50 years had an increased bone resorption.

Conclusions: Bone remodeling is a multifactorial process. The treatment planning has to take into consideration both implant- and patient-specific factors.

种植体周围边缘骨丢失:5年随访期间骨重塑的回顾性分析。
在种植体支持的康复中,种植体周围的骨重塑是一个持续的争论,在文献中没有共识。本研究旨在探讨种植体和患者特异性因素对种植体附近边缘骨质流失的影响。材料和方法:我们纳入了2014年至2018年期间使用一种种植体系统进行种植体支持的假肢康复的患者,他们有完整的随访记录和5年以上的骨科断层扫描,并且没有可能影响骨代谢的控制不良的全身性病变。结果:81例患者接受了500颗种植体,符合纳入标准。我们在5年随访中观察到约1毫米的骨吸收,在3年随访中记录到第一个0.78毫米。60岁以下的成年人骨吸收增加了大约30%。男性和女性之间没有差异。然而,在5岁时,50岁以上的女性患者的骨吸收比50岁以下的患者略有增加(30%)。最窄直径(3.5 mm;P = 0.001),前下颌骨骨吸收率最高(P = 0.008)。相反,当植入深度约为1 mm (p = 0.004)时,夹板种植假体(p = 0.21)和氧化锆材料假体(p = 0.57)的骨重塑最低。此外,60岁以下的患者和50岁以上的女性患者骨吸收增加。结论:骨重塑是一个多因素的过程。治疗计划必须同时考虑种植体和患者的具体因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信