{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Implementation and Adoption of a Virtual Fracture Clinic Pathway: A Closed Loop Audit.","authors":"Daire-Sean Gibbons, Aaron A Glynn","doi":"10.7759/cureus.76317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma and orthopedics departments have traditionally used face-to-face (FTF) fracture clinics for non-operative fractures. Developed in 2011, the virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was fully implemented at an institution during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce in-person interactions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>First, the study aims to measure the percentage of non-operative patients triaged through the VFC when this was optional and re-audit after implementing a COVID-19-related policy change mandating VFC triage. Second, the study aims to measure the number of FTF fracture clinic interactions and re-audit after implementing three policies: national COVID-19 lockdowns, mandated VFC triage, and early appropriate discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from two periods were examined, pre-pandemic (2018-2020) and pandemic (2020-2022), at a university teaching hospital. We measured compliance with modified British Orthopaedic Association Standards for timely senior review, minimizing outpatient visits, and patient-initiated follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of cases triaged to the VFC rose from 39% to 100%. FTF fracture clinic interactions dropped by 50.2% from 35,399 to 17,639. All three policy changes reduced FTF numbers: 3.7% due to national lockdowns, 14.7% due to VFC triage, and 35.5% due to early appropriate discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic provided a window in which healthcare working partners were more receptive to change. Our institution successfully used this opportunity to implement policy changes that improved patient care and maximized resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 12","pages":"e76317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Trauma and orthopedics departments have traditionally used face-to-face (FTF) fracture clinics for non-operative fractures. Developed in 2011, the virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was fully implemented at an institution during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce in-person interactions.
Aims: First, the study aims to measure the percentage of non-operative patients triaged through the VFC when this was optional and re-audit after implementing a COVID-19-related policy change mandating VFC triage. Second, the study aims to measure the number of FTF fracture clinic interactions and re-audit after implementing three policies: national COVID-19 lockdowns, mandated VFC triage, and early appropriate discharge.
Methods: Data from two periods were examined, pre-pandemic (2018-2020) and pandemic (2020-2022), at a university teaching hospital. We measured compliance with modified British Orthopaedic Association Standards for timely senior review, minimizing outpatient visits, and patient-initiated follow-up.
Results: The percentage of cases triaged to the VFC rose from 39% to 100%. FTF fracture clinic interactions dropped by 50.2% from 35,399 to 17,639. All three policy changes reduced FTF numbers: 3.7% due to national lockdowns, 14.7% due to VFC triage, and 35.5% due to early appropriate discharge.
Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic provided a window in which healthcare working partners were more receptive to change. Our institution successfully used this opportunity to implement policy changes that improved patient care and maximized resources.