Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Implementation and Adoption of a Virtual Fracture Clinic Pathway: A Closed Loop Audit.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.76317
Daire-Sean Gibbons, Aaron A Glynn
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Implementation and Adoption of a Virtual Fracture Clinic Pathway: A Closed Loop Audit.","authors":"Daire-Sean Gibbons, Aaron A Glynn","doi":"10.7759/cureus.76317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma and orthopedics departments have traditionally used face-to-face (FTF) fracture clinics for non-operative fractures. Developed in 2011, the virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was fully implemented at an institution during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce in-person interactions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>First, the study aims to measure the percentage of non-operative patients triaged through the VFC when this was optional and re-audit after implementing a COVID-19-related policy change mandating VFC triage. Second, the study aims to measure the number of FTF fracture clinic interactions and re-audit after implementing three policies: national COVID-19 lockdowns, mandated VFC triage, and early appropriate discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from two periods were examined, pre-pandemic (2018-2020) and pandemic (2020-2022), at a university teaching hospital. We measured compliance with modified British Orthopaedic Association Standards for timely senior review, minimizing outpatient visits, and patient-initiated follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of cases triaged to the VFC rose from 39% to 100%. FTF fracture clinic interactions dropped by 50.2% from 35,399 to 17,639. All three policy changes reduced FTF numbers: 3.7% due to national lockdowns, 14.7% due to VFC triage, and 35.5% due to early appropriate discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic provided a window in which healthcare working partners were more receptive to change. Our institution successfully used this opportunity to implement policy changes that improved patient care and maximized resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 12","pages":"e76317"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma and orthopedics departments have traditionally used face-to-face (FTF) fracture clinics for non-operative fractures. Developed in 2011, the virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was fully implemented at an institution during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce in-person interactions.

Aims: First, the study aims to measure the percentage of non-operative patients triaged through the VFC when this was optional and re-audit after implementing a COVID-19-related policy change mandating VFC triage. Second, the study aims to measure the number of FTF fracture clinic interactions and re-audit after implementing three policies: national COVID-19 lockdowns, mandated VFC triage, and early appropriate discharge.

Methods: Data from two periods were examined, pre-pandemic (2018-2020) and pandemic (2020-2022), at a university teaching hospital. We measured compliance with modified British Orthopaedic Association Standards for timely senior review, minimizing outpatient visits, and patient-initiated follow-up.

Results: The percentage of cases triaged to the VFC rose from 39% to 100%. FTF fracture clinic interactions dropped by 50.2% from 35,399 to 17,639. All three policy changes reduced FTF numbers: 3.7% due to national lockdowns, 14.7% due to VFC triage, and 35.5% due to early appropriate discharge.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic provided a window in which healthcare working partners were more receptive to change. Our institution successfully used this opportunity to implement policy changes that improved patient care and maximized resources.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信