"That's me at my best": perspectives of older adults on involvement in technology research.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susanna E Martin, Cindy C Zhang, Mallorie T Tam, Julie M Robillard
{"title":"\"That's me at my best\": perspectives of older adults on involvement in technology research.","authors":"Susanna E Martin, Cindy C Zhang, Mallorie T Tam, Julie M Robillard","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-013030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Creating assistive technology for older adults requires a deep understanding of their needs, values and preferences. Human-centred approaches can be used to engage older adults in technology research to help ensure that end solutions are ethically aligned, relevant and responsive to their priorities. However, the value of cocreation is not universally acknowledged. Older adults continue to receive negative stereotyping and are limited from engaging in research. With the growing demand for assistive technologies that effectively meet end-user needs, it is important that we deepen our knowledge about engagement and promote inclusion of older adults in technology research. To learn more, we asked members of a research advisory group for assistive technologies, specifically social robots, to tell us about their experiences of engagement and the impact it has on their lives, to speculate whether participation in research may promote human flourishing. Our findings reveal that engagement is more than knowledge exchange: it is a multifaceted, dynamic process that creates rich and meaningful experiences for older adults. Experiences of engagement dovetail with interpretations of flourishing and improved well-being, which include outcomes related to empowerment, autonomy and connectedness to self and others. Older adults also report finding purpose and satisfaction in knowing that their contributions to research may be used to develop technologies that can benefit others. This work amplifies the voice of lived experiences to deepen our understanding of the impacts of participation and prompts us to reimagine how older adults may be meaningfully engaged in technology research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":"648-656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-013030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creating assistive technology for older adults requires a deep understanding of their needs, values and preferences. Human-centred approaches can be used to engage older adults in technology research to help ensure that end solutions are ethically aligned, relevant and responsive to their priorities. However, the value of cocreation is not universally acknowledged. Older adults continue to receive negative stereotyping and are limited from engaging in research. With the growing demand for assistive technologies that effectively meet end-user needs, it is important that we deepen our knowledge about engagement and promote inclusion of older adults in technology research. To learn more, we asked members of a research advisory group for assistive technologies, specifically social robots, to tell us about their experiences of engagement and the impact it has on their lives, to speculate whether participation in research may promote human flourishing. Our findings reveal that engagement is more than knowledge exchange: it is a multifaceted, dynamic process that creates rich and meaningful experiences for older adults. Experiences of engagement dovetail with interpretations of flourishing and improved well-being, which include outcomes related to empowerment, autonomy and connectedness to self and others. Older adults also report finding purpose and satisfaction in knowing that their contributions to research may be used to develop technologies that can benefit others. This work amplifies the voice of lived experiences to deepen our understanding of the impacts of participation and prompts us to reimagine how older adults may be meaningfully engaged in technology research.

为老年人创造辅助技术需要深入了解他们的需求、价值观和偏好。可以采用以人为本的方法,让老年人参与技术研究,以帮助确保最终解决方案符合道德规范、与老年人息息相关,并能满足他们的优先需求。然而,共同创造的价值并未得到普遍认可。老年人继续受到负面的刻板印象,在参与研究方面受到限制。随着对能有效满足最终用户需求的辅助技术的需求日益增长,我们必须加深对老年人参与的了解,并促进他们参与技术研究。为了了解更多信息,我们邀请了一个辅助技术(特别是社交机器人)研究顾问小组的成员,让他们告诉我们他们的参与经历以及参与对他们生活的影响,从而推测参与研究是否会促进人类的繁荣。我们的研究结果表明,参与不仅仅是知识交流:它是一个多方面的动态过程,为老年人创造了丰富而有意义的体验。参与的体验与对蓬勃发展和福祉改善的解释相吻合,其中包括与赋权、自主以及与自我和他人的联系相关的成果。老年人还表示,他们知道自己对研究的贡献可能被用于开发造福他人的技术,从而找到了目标和满足感。这项工作放大了生活经验的声音,加深了我们对参与的影响的理解,并促使我们重新设想如何让老年人有意义地参与技术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信