Kimberly Barbet, Mona S Schmitz, Dirk Westhölter, Markus Kamler, Stephan Rütten, Anja L Thiebes, Barbara Sitek, Malte Bayer, Michaela Schedel, Sebastian Reuter, Kaid Darwiche, Anja E Luengen, Christian Taube
{"title":"Bronchoscopic biopsies - a novel source for primary airway epithelial cells in respiratory research.","authors":"Kimberly Barbet, Mona S Schmitz, Dirk Westhölter, Markus Kamler, Stephan Rütten, Anja L Thiebes, Barbara Sitek, Malte Bayer, Michaela Schedel, Sebastian Reuter, Kaid Darwiche, Anja E Luengen, Christian Taube","doi":"10.1186/s12931-024-03060-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using primary airway epithelial cells (AEC) is essential to mimic more closely different types and stages of lung disease in humans while reducing or even replacing animal experiments. Access to lung tissue remains limited because these samples are generally obtained from patients who undergo lung transplantation for end-stage lung disease or thoracic surgery for (mostly) lung cancer. We investigated whether forceps or cryo biopsies are a viable alternative source of AEC compared to the conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AECs were obtained ex vivo from healthy donor lung tissue using the conventional method and two biopsy procedures (forceps, cryo). The influence of the isolation method on the quality and function of AEC was investigated at different time-points during expansion and differentiation in air-liquid interface cultures. In addition, fully-differentiated AECs were stimulated with house dust mite extract (HDM) to allow functional analyses in an allergic in vitro model. Vitality or differentiation capacity were determined using flow cytometry, scanning electron microscope, periodic acid-Schiff reaction, immunofluorescence staining, and proteomics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As anticipated, no significant differences between each of the sampling methods were detected for any of the measured outcomes. The proteome composition was comparable for each isolation method, while donor-dependent effects were observed. Treatment with HDM led to minor differences in mucociliary differentiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings confirmed the adequacy of these alternative approaches for attaining primary AECs, which can now expand the research for a broader range of lung diseases and for studies at an earlier stage not requiring lung surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"439"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-03060-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Using primary airway epithelial cells (AEC) is essential to mimic more closely different types and stages of lung disease in humans while reducing or even replacing animal experiments. Access to lung tissue remains limited because these samples are generally obtained from patients who undergo lung transplantation for end-stage lung disease or thoracic surgery for (mostly) lung cancer. We investigated whether forceps or cryo biopsies are a viable alternative source of AEC compared to the conventional technique.
Methods: AECs were obtained ex vivo from healthy donor lung tissue using the conventional method and two biopsy procedures (forceps, cryo). The influence of the isolation method on the quality and function of AEC was investigated at different time-points during expansion and differentiation in air-liquid interface cultures. In addition, fully-differentiated AECs were stimulated with house dust mite extract (HDM) to allow functional analyses in an allergic in vitro model. Vitality or differentiation capacity were determined using flow cytometry, scanning electron microscope, periodic acid-Schiff reaction, immunofluorescence staining, and proteomics.
Results: As anticipated, no significant differences between each of the sampling methods were detected for any of the measured outcomes. The proteome composition was comparable for each isolation method, while donor-dependent effects were observed. Treatment with HDM led to minor differences in mucociliary differentiation.
Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the adequacy of these alternative approaches for attaining primary AECs, which can now expand the research for a broader range of lung diseases and for studies at an earlier stage not requiring lung surgery.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases.
As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion.
Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.