Validation and Final Results from the First Cardiac Lead Post-Approval Study Using Real-World Data.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S499248
Steven Mullane, Jacob B Hicks, Kazi Sharmin, Camden Harrell, Angie Rock, Crystal Miller
{"title":"Validation and Final Results from the First Cardiac Lead Post-Approval Study Using Real-World Data.","authors":"Steven Mullane, Jacob B Hicks, Kazi Sharmin, Camden Harrell, Angie Rock, Crystal Miller","doi":"10.2147/POR.S499248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of Electrophysiology Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of National Registries (EP PASSION), a multi-stakeholder collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and society partners, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device manufacturers, a 5-year bradycardia lead study transitioned from a traditional post-approval study (PAS) to a real-world data (RWD) approach using a novel method to evaluate chronic cardiac lead complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lead complications were identified using a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes from 2013 to 2020 fee-for-service Medicare claims data along with BIOTRONIK device registration and Medical Device Reporting data from patients implanted between 2013 and 2015 with a Solia S lead. A proof-of-concept analysis was performed using McNemar's test to compare lead complications reported in the traditional PAS with lead complications identified in the RWD. Kaplan-Meier survival and incidence rates were evaluated to determine real-world long-term safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proof-of-concept analysis of 896 patients found in both traditional PAS and RWD sources demonstrated a 99.7% proportion of overall agreement in identifying lead complications (p = 0.0833). Following this validation, 1841 study leads from 1015 Medicare patients were analyzed. A total of 33 lead complications (attributable or possibly attributable to the study lead) were identified for a rate of 0.005 complications per lead-year. The complication-free rate at 5-years post-implant was 97.2% (95% CI: 96.07%, 98.06%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results led to the first FDA approval for transition of a cardiac lead PAS to long-term safety reporting using RWD, paving the way for future real-world cardiac lead and device surveillance studies.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: </strong>NCT01791127.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"233-241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S499248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As part of Electrophysiology Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of National Registries (EP PASSION), a multi-stakeholder collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and society partners, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device manufacturers, a 5-year bradycardia lead study transitioned from a traditional post-approval study (PAS) to a real-world data (RWD) approach using a novel method to evaluate chronic cardiac lead complications.

Methods: Lead complications were identified using a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes from 2013 to 2020 fee-for-service Medicare claims data along with BIOTRONIK device registration and Medical Device Reporting data from patients implanted between 2013 and 2015 with a Solia S lead. A proof-of-concept analysis was performed using McNemar's test to compare lead complications reported in the traditional PAS with lead complications identified in the RWD. Kaplan-Meier survival and incidence rates were evaluated to determine real-world long-term safety.

Results: The proof-of-concept analysis of 896 patients found in both traditional PAS and RWD sources demonstrated a 99.7% proportion of overall agreement in identifying lead complications (p = 0.0833). Following this validation, 1841 study leads from 1015 Medicare patients were analyzed. A total of 33 lead complications (attributable or possibly attributable to the study lead) were identified for a rate of 0.005 complications per lead-year. The complication-free rate at 5-years post-implant was 97.2% (95% CI: 96.07%, 98.06%).

Conclusion: These results led to the first FDA approval for transition of a cardiac lead PAS to long-term safety reporting using RWD, paving the way for future real-world cardiac lead and device surveillance studies.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT01791127.

使用真实世界数据的首个心脏导联批准后研究的验证和最终结果
背景:作为国家注册电生理学可预测和可持续实施(EP PASSION)的一部分,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA),学术和社会合作伙伴以及心血管植入式电子设备制造商之间的多方利益相关者合作,一项5年心动过缓的研究从传统的批准后研究(PAS)过渡到现实世界数据(RWD)方法,使用一种新的方法来评估慢性心脏导联并发症。方法:结合2013年至2020年医疗保险费用报销数据的诊断和程序代码,以及2013年至2015年植入Solia S引线的患者的BIOTRONIK设备注册和医疗器械报告数据,确定引线并发症。采用McNemar测试进行概念验证分析,比较传统PAS中报告的铅并发症与RWD中发现的铅并发症。Kaplan-Meier生存率和发病率进行评估,以确定真实世界的长期安全性。结果:在传统PAS和RWD来源中发现的896例患者的概念验证分析表明,在识别铅并发症方面,99.7%的比例总体一致(p = 0.0833)。在此验证之后,对来自1015名医疗保险患者的1841项研究线索进行了分析。共发现33例引线并发症(可归因于或可能归因于研究引线),每引线年发生率为0.005例并发症。种植后5年无并发症率为97.2% (95% CI: 96.07%, 98.06%)。结论:这些结果导致FDA首次批准将心导联PAS转换为使用RWD的长期安全性报告,为未来现实世界的心导联和设备监测研究铺平了道路。Clinicaltrialsgov识别码:NCT01791127。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信