Detection of Patient-Level Immunotherapy-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) from Clinical Narratives of Electronic Health Records: A High-Sensitivity Artificial Intelligence Model.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S468253
Md Muntasir Zitu, Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Kai C Johnson, Shijun Zhang, Aditi Shendre, Mohamed I Elsaid, Lang Li
{"title":"Detection of Patient-Level Immunotherapy-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) from Clinical Narratives of Electronic Health Records: A High-Sensitivity Artificial Intelligence Model.","authors":"Md Muntasir Zitu, Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Kai C Johnson, Shijun Zhang, Aditi Shendre, Mohamed I Elsaid, Lang Li","doi":"10.2147/POR.S468253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect immunotherapy -related adverse events (irAEs) from clinical narratives of electronic health records (EHRs) at the patient level.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Training data, used for internal validation of the AI model, comprised 1230 clinical notes from 30 patients at The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital-20 patients who experienced irAEs and ten who did not. 3256 clinical notes of 50 patients were utilized for external validation of the AI model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of a leave-one-out cross-validation technique for internal validation among those 30 patients yielded accurate identification of 19 of 20 with irAEs (positive patients; 95% sensitivity) and correct dissociation of eight of ten without (negative patients; 80% specificity). External validation on 3256 clinical notes of 50 patients yielded high sensitivity (95%) but moderate specificity (64%). If we improve the model's specificity to 100%, it could eliminate the need to manually review 2500 of those 3256 clinical notes (77%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined use of this AI model with the manual review of clinical notes will improve both sensitivity and specificity in the detection of irAEs, decreasing workload and costs and facilitating the development of improved immunotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"243-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S468253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect immunotherapy -related adverse events (irAEs) from clinical narratives of electronic health records (EHRs) at the patient level.

Patients and methods: Training data, used for internal validation of the AI model, comprised 1230 clinical notes from 30 patients at The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital-20 patients who experienced irAEs and ten who did not. 3256 clinical notes of 50 patients were utilized for external validation of the AI model.

Results: Use of a leave-one-out cross-validation technique for internal validation among those 30 patients yielded accurate identification of 19 of 20 with irAEs (positive patients; 95% sensitivity) and correct dissociation of eight of ten without (negative patients; 80% specificity). External validation on 3256 clinical notes of 50 patients yielded high sensitivity (95%) but moderate specificity (64%). If we improve the model's specificity to 100%, it could eliminate the need to manually review 2500 of those 3256 clinical notes (77%).

Conclusion: Combined use of this AI model with the manual review of clinical notes will improve both sensitivity and specificity in the detection of irAEs, decreasing workload and costs and facilitating the development of improved immunotherapies.

从电子健康记录的临床叙述中检测患者水平的免疫治疗相关不良事件(irAEs):一个高灵敏度的人工智能模型
目的:我们开发了一个人工智能(AI)模型,从患者层面的电子健康记录(EHRs)的临床叙述中检测免疫治疗相关不良事件(irAEs)。患者和方法:用于人工智能模型内部验证的训练数据包括俄亥俄州立大学詹姆斯癌症医院30名患者的1230份临床记录,其中20名患者经历过irae, 10名患者没有经历过irae。利用50例患者的3256份临床记录对AI模型进行外部验证。结果:使用留一交叉验证技术对这30例患者进行内部验证,20例raes阳性患者中有19例准确识别;95%的灵敏度)和正确分离的10个没有(阴性)患者中的8个;特异性80%)。对50例患者的3256份临床记录进行外部验证,结果敏感性高(95%),特异性中等(64%)。如果我们将模型的特异性提高到100%,它可以消除对3256个临床记录中的2500个(77%)进行人工审查的需要。结论:人工智能模型与临床记录人工审查相结合,将提高irae检测的敏感性和特异性,减少工作量和成本,促进改进免疫疗法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信